Lithia Motors, Inc.
Lithia Motors, Inc. LAD Peers
See (LAD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | $350.91 | +0.23% | 9.3B | 11.24 | $31.71 | +0.75% |
| CPRT | $47.63 | -0.02% | 46.4B | 31.78 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $182.26 | +0.38% | 12.2B | 12.97 | $14.18 | +2.56% |
| KMX | $64.68 | -3.85% | 10B | 18.49 | $3.62 | N/A |
| AN | $212.66 | -0.29% | 8.1B | 12.74 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $476.22 | +2.24% | 6.2B | 13.46 | $35.62 | +0.50% |
| ABG | $262.10 | +0.42% | 5.2B | 12.68 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $54.00 | -0.64% | 4.2B | 15.54 | $3.57 | +1.32% |
| RUSHA | $53.11 | -1.15% | 4.2B | 15.16 | $3.57 | +1.32% |
| ACVA | $16.09 | -2.54% | 3B | -37.60 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LAD vs CPRT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CPRT trades at $47.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs PAG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while PAG trades at $182.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KMX Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while KMX trades at $64.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs AN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while AN trades at $212.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs GPI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while GPI trades at $476.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ABG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while ABG trades at $262.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RUSHB Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while RUSHB trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while RUSHA trades at $53.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ACVA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while ACVA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs DRVN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while DRVN trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SAH Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while SAH trades at $87.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KAR Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while KAR trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CWH Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CWH trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -37.69. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs UXIN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 803.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while UXIN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CARS Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CARS trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CANG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 557.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CANG trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs NWTNW Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 546.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs NWTN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while NWTN trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CRMT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CRMT trades at $59.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KFS Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while KFS trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -37.15. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SDA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while SDA trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RMBL Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while RMBL trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LAZY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs VRM Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while VRM trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CZOO Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs GORV Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while GORV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs AZI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while AZI trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs UCAR Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while UCAR trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs JZXN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while JZXN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KXIN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while KXIN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CTNT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while CTNT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SFT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LMPX Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 272.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while LMPX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LOTZ Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LOTZW Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 9.3B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $350.91, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.