Lithia Motors, Inc.
Lithia Motors, Inc. LAD Peers
See (LAD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
LAD vs CPRT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 58.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CPRT trades at $61.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs PAG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while PAG trades at $156.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KMX Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KMX trades at $66.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SIETY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SIETY trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIETY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to SIETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SIEVF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SIEVF trades at $168.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs AN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while AN trades at $175.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ZHSHF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while ZHSHF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to ZHSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs GPI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while GPI trades at $411.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ATOGF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while ATOGF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 212.80. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ABG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while ABG trades at $220.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while RUSHA trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RUSHB Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while RUSHB trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs USSJF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to USSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ZSHGY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while ZSHGY trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs IHCPF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while IHCPF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs DRVN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while DRVN trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs ACVA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while ACVA trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -32.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs USSJY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while USSJY trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SAH Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SAH trades at $62.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KAR Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KAR trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CWH Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 872.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CWH trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CARS Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 746.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CARS trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CYYHF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 508.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CYYHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KMUXF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KMUXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CMEIF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 432.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CMEIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CMEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CANG Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 420.34M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CANG trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CRMT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 395.99M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CRMT trades at $47.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs PDGNF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to PDGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LKKRF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to LKKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SDA Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 295.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SDA trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs VTMTF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 281.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while VTMTF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to VTMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs AOCIF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 273.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while AOCIF trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to AOCIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KFS Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 246.18M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KFS trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs MVXM Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to MVXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs NWAU Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to NWAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs MTPTF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 151.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs AZI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 141.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while AZI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs NWTN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 111.15M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while NWTN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RMBL Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 104.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while RMBL trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LAZY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CZASF Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 33.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CZASF's ROE of -15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CZOO Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CZOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs GBXXY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.22M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to GBXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs JZXN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 25.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while JZXN trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs GORV Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 20.81M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while GORV trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs UCAR Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 13.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while UCAR trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KXIN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 9.86M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KXIN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs VRM Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while VRM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRM's ROE of -8.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs NWTNW Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while NWTNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CTNT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CTNT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs UXIN Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while UXIN trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SFT Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LMPX Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LMPX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs PREC Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 247505.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs KXINW Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59137.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs RWGI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24797.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while RWGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to RWGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SPMI Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12766.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to SPMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs MTAM Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 4995.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to MTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LASLY Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3257.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LASLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is more volatile compared to LASLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs SFTGQ Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1700.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs CALIQ Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484.00. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LOTZW Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LOTZW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
LAD vs LOTZ Comparison
LAD plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAD stands at 7.77B. In comparison, LOTZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LAD is priced at $298.55, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAD currently has a P/E ratio of 10.07, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LAD's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LAD is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAD.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT | $61.05 | -0.28% | 58.98B | 40.97 | $1.49 | N/A |
PAG | $156.28 | -0.68% | 10.43B | 11.38 | $13.73 | +2.83% |
KMX | $66.29 | -0.63% | 10.12B | 20.65 | $3.21 | N/A |
SIETY | $88.90 | +3.88% | 9.44B | 23.96 | $3.71 | +33.18% |
SIEVF | $168.78 | N/A | 8.96B | 22.72 | $7.43 | +39.03% |
LAD | $298.55 | +0.69% | 7.77B | 10.07 | $29.65 | +0.71% |
AN | $175.56 | -0.68% | 6.62B | 10.40 | $16.88 | N/A |
ZHSHF | $2.56 | -28.03% | 6.05B | 7.10 | $0.36 | +4.29% |
GPI | $411.40 | -0.25% | 5.32B | 11.20 | $36.73 | +0.46% |
ATOGF | $21.28 | -8.47% | 4.65B | 212.80 | $0.10 | N/A |