CarMax, Inc.
CarMax, Inc. KMX Peers
See (KMX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMX | $64.42 | -4.24% | 10B | 18.49 | $3.62 | N/A |
| CPRT | $47.45 | -0.40% | 46.4B | 31.78 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $181.77 | +0.11% | 12.2B | 12.97 | $14.18 | +2.56% |
| LAD | $350.35 | +0.07% | 9.3B | 11.24 | $31.71 | +0.75% |
| AN | $212.12 | -0.54% | 8.1B | 12.74 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $473.74 | +1.71% | 6.2B | 13.46 | $35.62 | +0.50% |
| ABG | $261.09 | +0.03% | 5.2B | 12.68 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $53.89 | -0.85% | 4.2B | 15.54 | $3.57 | +1.32% |
| RUSHA | $53.13 | -1.13% | 4.2B | 15.16 | $3.57 | +1.32% |
| ACVA | $16.13 | -2.30% | 3B | -37.60 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KMX vs CPRT Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CPRT trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs PAG Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while PAG trades at $181.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs LAD Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while LAD trades at $350.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs AN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while AN trades at $212.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs GPI Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while GPI trades at $473.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs ABG Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while ABG trades at $261.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs RUSHB Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while RUSHB trades at $53.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs RUSHA Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while RUSHA trades at $53.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs ACVA Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while ACVA trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs DRVN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while DRVN trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs SAH Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while SAH trades at $87.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs KAR Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while KAR trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CWH Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CWH trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -37.69. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs UXIN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 803.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while UXIN trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CARS Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CARS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CANG Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 557.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CANG trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -179.00. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs NWTNW Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 546.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs NWTN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while NWTN trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CRMT Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 505.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CRMT trades at $58.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs KFS Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 418.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while KFS trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -37.15. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs SDA Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while SDA trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs RMBL Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while RMBL trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs LAZY Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs VRM Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while VRM trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is more volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CZOO Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs GORV Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while GORV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs AZI Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while AZI trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs UCAR Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while UCAR trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs JZXN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while JZXN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs KXIN Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while KXIN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs CTNT Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while CTNT trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs SFT Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs LMPX Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 272.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while LMPX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs LOTZW Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.
KMX vs LOTZ Comparison
KMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMX stands at 10B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KMX is priced at $64.42, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMX currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KMX's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KMX is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMX.