OPENLANE, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KAR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KAR
OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAR | $27.44 | +0.40% | 2.9B | 31.54 | $0.87 | N/A |
| CVNA | $338.81 | +5.81% | 73.5B | 40.15 | $8.44 | N/A |
| PAG | $153.26 | +3.44% | 10.1B | 10.86 | $14.13 | +3.50% |
| AN | $196.91 | +1.76% | 6.8B | 11.56 | $17.05 | N/A |
| KMX | $44.24 | +2.15% | 6.5B | 14.51 | $3.05 | N/A |
| LAD | $263.28 | +0.67% | 6.2B | 8.15 | $32.31 | +0.83% |
| RUSHB | $70.72 | +5.24% | 5.4B | 21.63 | $3.27 | +1.07% |
| RUSHA | $70.20 | +4.93% | 5.4B | 21.47 | $3.27 | +1.07% |
| GPI | $332.63 | +2.68% | 4.2B | 13.25 | $25.14 | +0.62% |
| ABG | $200.68 | +2.84% | 3.9B | 7.99 | $25.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KAR vs CVNA Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CVNA has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CVNA trades at $338.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CVNA's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVNA's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CVNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CVNA's competition here
KAR vs PAG Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while PAG trades at $153.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check PAG's competition here
KAR vs AN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while AN trades at $196.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check AN's competition here
KAR vs KMX Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KMX trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KMX's competition here
KAR vs LAD Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LAD trades at $263.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LAD's competition here
KAR vs RUSHB Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RUSHB trades at $70.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RUSHB's competition here
KAR vs RUSHA Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RUSHA trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RUSHA's competition here
KAR vs GPI Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while GPI trades at $332.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check GPI's competition here
KAR vs ABG Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while ABG trades at $200.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check ABG's competition here
KAR vs CARG Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CARG trades at $34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CARG's competition here
KAR vs OPLN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OPLN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while OPLN trades at $29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas OPLN's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to OPLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check OPLN's competition here
KAR vs BGSI Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BGSI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while BGSI trades at $123.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas BGSI's P/E ratio is 150.76. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BGSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to BGSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check BGSI's competition here
KAR vs SAH Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SAH trades at $65.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SAH's competition here
KAR vs DRVN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while DRVN trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check DRVN's competition here
KAR vs ACVA Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 797.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while ACVA trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check ACVA's competition here
KAR vs UXIN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 611.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while UXIN trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check UXIN's competition here
KAR vs CARS Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 551.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CARS trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CARS's competition here
KAR vs CWH Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 450.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CWH trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CWH's competition here
KAR vs NWTN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while NWTN trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check NWTN's competition here
KAR vs KFS Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 332.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KFS trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -26.98. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KFS's competition here
KAR vs SDA Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SDA trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SDA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SDA's competition here
KAR vs CANG Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 150.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CANG trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CANG's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CANG's competition here
KAR vs RDNW Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDNW has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RDNW trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RDNW's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDNW's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RDNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RDNW's competition here
KAR vs RMBL Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while RMBL trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -74.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check RMBL's competition here
KAR vs CRMT Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CRMT trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRMT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CRMT's competition here
KAR vs VRM Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while VRM trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check VRM's competition here
KAR vs LAZY Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LAZY's competition here
KAR vs OTH Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while OTH trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -36.31. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OTH's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check OTH's competition here
KAR vs CZOO Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CZOO's competition here
KAR vs NWTNW Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -160.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check NWTNW's competition here
KAR vs AZI Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while AZI trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check AZI's competition here
KAR vs CTNT Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while CTNT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check CTNT's competition here
KAR vs SFT Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check SFT's competition here
KAR vs GORV Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while GORV trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GORV's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is more volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check GORV's competition here
KAR vs JZXN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while JZXN trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check JZXN's competition here
KAR vs LMPX Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 763.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LMPX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMPX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LMPX's competition here
KAR vs KXIN Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 167.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while KXIN trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check KXIN's competition here
KAR vs UCAR Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 105.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while UCAR trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check UCAR's competition here
KAR vs LOTZ Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LOTZ's competition here
KAR vs LOTZW Comparison April 2026
KAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KAR is priced at $27.44, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KAR currently has a P/E ratio of 31.54, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KAR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KAR is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KAR.Check LOTZW's competition here