Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GPI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPI | $418.70 | +2.07% | 5.3B | 11.25 | $36.22 | +0.47% |
| CPRT | $46.52 | +2.23% | 44.2B | 30.29 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $177.29 | +5.37% | 11.1B | 11.73 | $14.37 | +2.81% |
| KMX | $56.11 | +0.22% | 8.2B | 15.10 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $297.49 | +3.44% | 7.3B | 8.43 | $33.71 | +0.74% |
| AN | $194.64 | +2.13% | 7.1B | 11.88 | $15.93 | N/A |
| ABG | $230.14 | +3.19% | 4.4B | 8.20 | $27.32 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $56.28 | +5.10% | 4.3B | 15.64 | $3.51 | +1.31% |
| RUSHB | $54.59 | +4.26% | 4.2B | 15.19 | $3.51 | +1.31% |
| DRVN | $17.28 | +3.41% | 2.8B | -9.54 | -$1.78 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GPI vs CPRT Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CPRT trades at $46.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CPRT's competition here
GPI vs PAG Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while PAG trades at $177.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check PAG's competition here
GPI vs KMX Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while KMX trades at $56.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KMX's competition here
GPI vs LAD Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while LAD trades at $297.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LAD's competition here
GPI vs AN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while AN trades at $194.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check AN's competition here
GPI vs ABG Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while ABG trades at $230.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check ABG's competition here
GPI vs RUSHA Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while RUSHA trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RUSHA's competition here
GPI vs RUSHB Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while RUSHB trades at $54.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RUSHB's competition here
GPI vs DRVN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while DRVN trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check DRVN's competition here
GPI vs KAR Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while KAR trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KAR's competition here
GPI vs ACVA Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while ACVA trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check ACVA's competition here
GPI vs SAH Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while SAH trades at $72.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SAH's competition here
GPI vs CWH Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 930.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CWH trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -61.87. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CWH's competition here
GPI vs CARS Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 792.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CARS trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CARS's competition here
GPI vs UXIN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 752M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while UXIN trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check UXIN's competition here
GPI vs NWTNW Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check NWTNW's competition here
GPI vs CANG Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CANG trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -156.83. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CANG's competition here
GPI vs KFS Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while KFS trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -35.72. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KFS's competition here
GPI vs NWTN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while NWTN trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check NWTN's competition here
GPI vs CRMT Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CRMT trades at $43.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CRMT's competition here
GPI vs SDA Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while SDA trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SDA's competition here
GPI vs VRM Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while VRM trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check VRM's competition here
GPI vs RMBL Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while RMBL trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check RMBL's competition here
GPI vs LAZY Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LAZY's competition here
GPI vs CZOO Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CZOO's competition here
GPI vs AZI Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while AZI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check AZI's competition here
GPI vs GORV Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while GORV trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check GORV's competition here
GPI vs JZXN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while JZXN trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check JZXN's competition here
GPI vs UCAR Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while UCAR trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check UCAR's competition here
GPI vs KXIN Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while KXIN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check KXIN's competition here
GPI vs CTNT Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while CTNT trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check CTNT's competition here
GPI vs SFT Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check SFT's competition here
GPI vs LMPX Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 498K. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while LMPX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LMPX's competition here
GPI vs LOTZ Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LOTZ's competition here
GPI vs LOTZW Comparison August 2025
GPI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPI stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPI is priced at $418.70, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPI currently has a P/E ratio of 11.25, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPI's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPI is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPI.Check LOTZW's competition here