Camping World Holdings, Inc.
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CWH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWH | $15.09 | +0.67% | 946M | -62.92 | -$0.24 | +3.34% |
| CPRT | $47.11 | +1.21% | 45.6B | 31.20 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $178.14 | +0.69% | 11.8B | 12.42 | $14.36 | +2.65% |
| KMX | $56.22 | +0.21% | 8.4B | 15.54 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $296.92 | -0.29% | 7.6B | 8.81 | $33.71 | +0.71% |
| AN | $195.51 | +0.01% | 7.4B | 12.27 | $15.93 | N/A |
| GPI | $423.18 | +0.75% | 5.5B | 11.68 | $36.22 | +0.46% |
| ABG | $229.38 | +0.10% | 4.5B | 8.39 | $27.32 | N/A |
| RUSHB | $54.89 | +0.51% | 4.4B | 15.64 | $3.51 | +1.29% |
| RUSHA | $55.73 | -1.31% | 4.3B | 15.88 | $3.51 | +1.29% |
Stock Comparison
CWH vs CPRT Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CPRT trades at $47.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CPRT's competition here
CWH vs PAG Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while PAG trades at $178.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check PAG's competition here
CWH vs KMX Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while KMX trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check KMX's competition here
CWH vs LAD Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while LAD trades at $296.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check LAD's competition here
CWH vs AN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while AN trades at $195.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check AN's competition here
CWH vs GPI Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while GPI trades at $423.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check GPI's competition here
CWH vs ABG Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while ABG trades at $229.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check ABG's competition here
CWH vs RUSHB Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while RUSHB trades at $54.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check RUSHB's competition here
CWH vs RUSHA Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while RUSHA trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check RUSHA's competition here
CWH vs KAR Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while KAR trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 49.84. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check KAR's competition here
CWH vs DRVN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while DRVN trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check DRVN's competition here
CWH vs ACVA Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while ACVA trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -32.58. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check ACVA's competition here
CWH vs SAH Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while SAH trades at $74.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check SAH's competition here
CWH vs CARS Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 827M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CARS trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CARS's competition here
CWH vs UXIN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 789.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while UXIN trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check UXIN's competition here
CWH vs CANG Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CANG trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -160.67. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CANG's competition here
CWH vs KFS Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 419.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while KFS trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -37.28. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check KFS's competition here
CWH vs NWTNW Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check NWTNW's competition here
CWH vs NWTN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while NWTN trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check NWTN's competition here
CWH vs CRMT Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CRMT trades at $44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CRMT's competition here
CWH vs SDA Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 227.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while SDA trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check SDA's competition here
CWH vs VRM Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 141.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while VRM trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check VRM's competition here
CWH vs RMBL Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while RMBL trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check RMBL's competition here
CWH vs LAZY Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check LAZY's competition here
CWH vs CZOO Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CZOO's competition here
CWH vs AZI Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while AZI trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check AZI's competition here
CWH vs GORV Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while GORV trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check GORV's competition here
CWH vs UCAR Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while UCAR trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check UCAR's competition here
CWH vs JZXN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while JZXN trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check JZXN's competition here
CWH vs KXIN Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while KXIN trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check KXIN's competition here
CWH vs CTNT Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while CTNT trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check CTNT's competition here
CWH vs SFT Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check SFT's competition here
CWH vs LMPX Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 498K. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while LMPX trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check LMPX's competition here
CWH vs LOTZW Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check LOTZW's competition here
CWH vs LOTZ Comparison August 2025
CWH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWH stands at 946M. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWH is priced at $15.09, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWH currently has a P/E ratio of -62.92, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CWH's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CWH is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWH.Check LOTZ's competition here