Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AHMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHMA | $1.08 | -1.82% | 32.1M | 27.00 | $0.04 | N/A |
| BKNG | $4,117.51 | +1.36% | 132.7B | 24.84 | $165.74 | +0.96% |
| ABNB | $123.10 | +0.19% | 73.8B | 30.55 | $4.03 | N/A |
| RCL | $261.37 | -0.16% | 71.3B | 16.76 | $15.60 | +1.62% |
| TCOM | $49.17 | +1.40% | 32.1B | 7.13 | $6.90 | N/A |
| VIK | $68.45 | -0.19% | 30.4B | 26.65 | $2.57 | N/A |
| EXPE | $226.51 | +0.31% | 26.5B | 23.11 | $9.80 | +0.74% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $17.65 | -4.54% | 8B | 19.17 | $0.92 | N/A |
| TNL | $67.26 | -0.64% | 4.2B | 19.57 | $3.44 | +3.38% |
Stock Comparison
AHMA vs BKNG Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while BKNG trades at $4,117.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check BKNG's competition here
AHMA vs ABNB Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while ABNB trades at $123.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check ABNB's competition here
AHMA vs RCL Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while RCL trades at $261.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check RCL's competition here
AHMA vs TCOM Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while TCOM trades at $49.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TCOM's competition here
AHMA vs VIK Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while VIK trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIK's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check VIK's competition here
AHMA vs EXPE Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while EXPE trades at $226.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check EXPE's competition here
AHMA vs SABRP Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABRP's competition here
AHMA vs NCLH Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while NCLH trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NCLH's competition here
AHMA vs TNL Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while TNL trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TNL's competition here
AHMA vs MMYT Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while MMYT trades at $36.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 69.94. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MMYT's competition here
AHMA vs DESP Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check DESP's competition here
AHMA vs TRIP Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while TRIP trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TRIP's competition here
AHMA vs LIND Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 913.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while LIND trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -26.37. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check LIND's competition here
AHMA vs NUTR Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NUTR's competition here
AHMA vs SABR Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while SABR trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABR's competition here
AHMA vs MRNOW Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while MRNOW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MRNOW's competition here
AHMA vs YTRA Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while YTRA trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check YTRA's competition here
AHMA vs TOUR Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while TOUR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TOUR's competition here
AHMA vs NTRP Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while NTRP trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NTRP's competition here
AHMA vs MKGI Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MKGI's competition here
AHMA vs JXG Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 938.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while JXG trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check JXG's competition here
AHMA vs MOND Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MOND's competition here
AHMA vs MONDW Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MONDW's competition here
AHMA vs SGLBW Comparison March 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.08, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SGLBW's competition here