ACV Auctions Inc.
ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVA | $13.51 | -4.93% | 2.4B | -30.70 | -$0.44 | N/A |
| CPRT | $45.51 | +0.40% | 44B | 30.14 | $1.51 | N/A |
| PAG | $168.26 | +0.51% | 11.1B | 11.71 | $14.36 | +2.82% |
| KMX | $55.98 | -1.11% | 8.4B | 15.46 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $287.60 | -0.14% | 7.5B | 8.52 | $33.70 | +0.74% |
| AN | $190.58 | -1.07% | 7.2B | 11.98 | $15.92 | N/A |
| GPI | $410.20 | -0.47% | 5.3B | 11.33 | $36.23 | +0.47% |
| ABG | $223.02 | +0.41% | 4.4B | 8.16 | $27.33 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $53.55 | -1.09% | 4.2B | 15.26 | $3.51 | +1.33% |
| RUSHB | $52.36 | -3.59% | 4.1B | 14.92 | $3.51 | +1.33% |
Stock Comparison
ACVA vs CPRT Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CPRT trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CPRT's competition here
ACVA vs PAG Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PAG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while PAG trades at $168.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas PAG's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to PAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check PAG's competition here
ACVA vs KMX Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while KMX trades at $55.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check KMX's competition here
ACVA vs LAD Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while LAD trades at $287.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check LAD's competition here
ACVA vs AN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while AN trades at $190.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check AN's competition here
ACVA vs GPI Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while GPI trades at $410.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check GPI's competition here
ACVA vs ABG Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while ABG trades at $223.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check ABG's competition here
ACVA vs RUSHA Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while RUSHA trades at $53.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check RUSHA's competition here
ACVA vs RUSHB Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while RUSHB trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check RUSHB's competition here
ACVA vs DRVN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while DRVN trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check DRVN's competition here
ACVA vs KAR Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while KAR trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check KAR's competition here
ACVA vs SAH Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while SAH trades at $71.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check SAH's competition here
ACVA vs CWH Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CWH trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -57.96. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CWH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CWH's competition here
ACVA vs CARS Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 782M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CARS trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CARS's competition here
ACVA vs UXIN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 756.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while UXIN trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check UXIN's competition here
ACVA vs CANG Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CANG trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -148.33. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CANG's competition here
ACVA vs NWTN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 412M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while NWTN trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check NWTN's competition here
ACVA vs KFS Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while KFS trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -34.18. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check KFS's competition here
ACVA vs CRMT Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 353.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CRMT trades at $42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CRMT's competition here
ACVA vs NWTNW Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check NWTNW's competition here
ACVA vs SDA Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while SDA trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check SDA's competition here
ACVA vs VRM Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while VRM trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check VRM's competition here
ACVA vs RMBL Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while RMBL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check RMBL's competition here
ACVA vs LAZY Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check LAZY's competition here
ACVA vs CZOO Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CZOO's competition here
ACVA vs AZI Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while AZI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check AZI's competition here
ACVA vs GORV Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while GORV trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check GORV's competition here
ACVA vs JZXN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while JZXN trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check JZXN's competition here
ACVA vs UCAR Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while UCAR trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check UCAR's competition here
ACVA vs KXIN Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while KXIN trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check KXIN's competition here
ACVA vs CTNT Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while CTNT trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check CTNT's competition here
ACVA vs SFT Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check SFT's competition here
ACVA vs LMPX Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 448.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while LMPX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check LMPX's competition here
ACVA vs LOTZ Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check LOTZ's competition here
ACVA vs LOTZW Comparison August 2025
ACVA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACVA stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACVA is priced at $13.51, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACVA currently has a P/E ratio of -30.70, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACVA's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACVA is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACVA.Check LOTZW's competition here