Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.
Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (WHG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WHG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHG | $18.46 | -1.60% | 173.6M | 43.93 | $0.42 | +3.25% |
| MS-PA | $22.23 | -0.80% | 239.5B | 2.84 | $7.86 | +2.55% |
| MS-PK | $24.49 | -0.08% | 239.5B | 3.12 | $7.86 | +2.55% |
| MS-PI | $25.28 | +0.16% | 237B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +2.55% |
| MS-PF | $25.43 | +0.16% | 237B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.55% |
| MS | $147.65 | -0.25% | 235.7B | 16.70 | $8.84 | +2.55% |
| MS-PE | $25.62 | -0.31% | 235.7B | 3.26 | $7.86 | +2.55% |
| GS-PA | $22.13 | -0.23% | 228.8B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.62% |
| GS-PC | $21.81 | -0.13% | 227.3B | 1.74 | $12.53 | +1.62% |
| GS-PD | $21.25 | -0.47% | 226.2B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
WHG vs MS-PA Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 239.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PA trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PA's competition here
WHG vs MS-PK Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 239.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PK trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PK's competition here
WHG vs MS-PI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PI trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PI's competition here
WHG vs MS-PF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PF's competition here
WHG vs MS Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS trades at $147.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS's competition here
WHG vs MS-PE Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PE trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PE's competition here
WHG vs GS-PA Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 228.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS-PA trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS-PA's competition here
WHG vs GS-PC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 227.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS-PC trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS-PC's competition here
WHG vs GS-PD Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 226.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS-PD trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS-PD's competition here
WHG vs GS Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 223.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS trades at $738.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS's competition here
WHG vs SCHW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 174.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SCHW trades at $96.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SCHW's competition here
WHG vs SCHW-PD Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
WHG vs GS-PJ Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS-PJ's competition here
WHG vs GS-PK Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GS-PK's competition here
WHG vs MS-PQ Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PQ trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PQ's competition here
WHG vs MS-PP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PP trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PP's competition here
WHG vs SCHW-PJ Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
WHG vs MS-PL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PL trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PL's competition here
WHG vs RJF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while RJF trades at $165.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check RJF's competition here
WHG vs LPLA Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while LPLA trades at $360.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check LPLA's competition here
WHG vs MS-PO Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MS-PO trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MS-PO's competition here
WHG vs IBKR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while IBKR trades at $62.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check IBKR's competition here
WHG vs TW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while TW trades at $126.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check TW's competition here
WHG vs FUTU Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while FUTU trades at $194.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check FUTU's competition here
WHG vs NMR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while NMR trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check NMR's competition here
WHG vs HLI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while HLI trades at $196.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check HLI's competition here
WHG vs JEF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while JEF trades at $62.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check JEF's competition here
WHG vs EVR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while EVR trades at $318.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check EVR's competition here
WHG vs SF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SF trades at $115.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SF's competition here
WHG vs SF-PB Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SF-PB trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SF-PB's competition here
WHG vs FRHC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while FRHC trades at $171.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check FRHC's competition here
WHG vs SCE-PJ Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
WHG vs XP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while XP trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check XP's competition here
WHG vs MKTX Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MKTX trades at $190.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MKTX's competition here
WHG vs VIRT Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while VIRT trades at $42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check VIRT's competition here
WHG vs PIPR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while PIPR trades at $334.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check PIPR's competition here
WHG vs MARA Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MARA trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MARA's competition here
WHG vs IREN Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while IREN trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -74.58. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check IREN's competition here
WHG vs LAZ Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while LAZ trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check LAZ's competition here
WHG vs RJF-PA Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check RJF-PA's competition here
WHG vs MC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MC trades at $71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MC's competition here
WHG vs SNEX Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SNEX trades at $98.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SNEX's competition here
WHG vs RJF-PB Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while RJF-PB trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check RJF-PB's competition here
WHG vs BGC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BGC trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BGC's competition here
WHG vs PJT Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while PJT trades at $178.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check PJT's competition here
WHG vs WULF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while WULF trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -25.51. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check WULF's competition here
WHG vs CIFRW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while CIFRW trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check CIFRW's competition here
WHG vs CIFR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while CIFR trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -14.76. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check CIFR's competition here
WHG vs MRX Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MRX trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MRX's competition here
WHG vs SF-PC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SF-PC trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SF-PC's competition here
WHG vs HUT Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while HUT trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check HUT's competition here
WHG vs TIGR Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while TIGR trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check TIGR's competition here
WHG vs PWP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while PWP trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check PWP's competition here
WHG vs SF-PD Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SF-PD trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SF-PD's competition here
WHG vs BGCP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BGCP's competition here
WHG vs DFIN Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while DFIN trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check DFIN's competition here
WHG vs HKIB Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check HKIB's competition here
WHG vs COWN Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check COWN's competition here
WHG vs BTBT Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 893.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BTBT trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BTBT's competition here
WHG vs OPY Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 744.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while OPY trades at $71.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check OPY's competition here
WHG vs AC Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 698.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while AC trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check AC's competition here
WHG vs BITF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 691.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BITF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BITF's competition here
WHG vs FUFU Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 627.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while FUFU trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check FUFU's competition here
WHG vs FUFUW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 614.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while FUFUW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check FUFUW's competition here
WHG vs AMRK Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while AMRK trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check AMRK's competition here
WHG vs HIVE Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 565.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while HIVE trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HIVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check HIVE's competition here
WHG vs MFH Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MFH trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MFH's competition here
WHG vs GHL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GHL's competition here
WHG vs BTCS Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BTCS trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BTCS's competition here
WHG vs SWIN Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SWIN trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SWIN's competition here
WHG vs PROP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while PROP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check PROP's competition here
WHG vs GRYP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GRYP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GRYP's competition here
WHG vs SIEB Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SIEB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SIEB's competition here
WHG vs BTM Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while BTM trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -189.00. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check BTM's competition here
WHG vs TCJH Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check TCJH's competition here
WHG vs CLSKW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while CLSKW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check CLSKW's competition here
WHG vs SRL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SRL trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SRL's competition here
WHG vs HGBL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while HGBL trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check HGBL's competition here
WHG vs GRDI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GRDI's competition here
WHG vs PLUT Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while PLUT trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -56.30. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check PLUT's competition here
WHG vs TOP Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while TOP trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check TOP's competition here
WHG vs SDIG Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SDIG's competition here
WHG vs MDBH Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MDBH trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MDBH's competition here
WHG vs COHN Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while COHN trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check COHN's competition here
WHG vs GREE Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GREE trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GREE's competition here
WHG vs SAI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SAI's competition here
WHG vs ARBK Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while ARBK trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check ARBK's competition here
WHG vs MEGL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MEGL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MEGL's competition here
WHG vs NCPL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while NCPL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check NCPL's competition here
WHG vs ABTS Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while ABTS trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check ABTS's competition here
WHG vs MIGI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while MIGI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check MIGI's competition here
WHG vs NCPLW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check NCPLW's competition here
WHG vs ATIF Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check ATIF's competition here
WHG vs GSIW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GSIW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GSIW's competition here
WHG vs WAI Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while WAI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check WAI's competition here
WHG vs GRDIW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check GRDIW's competition here
WHG vs SAITW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check SAITW's competition here
WHG vs LGHLW Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 268.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check LGHLW's competition here
WHG vs LGHL Comparison August 2025
WHG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHG stands at 173.6M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 192.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WHG is priced at $18.46, while LGHL trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHG currently has a P/E ratio of 43.93, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WHG's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WHG is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHG.Check LGHL's competition here