Interactive Strength Inc. (TRNR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRNR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRNR | $0.58 | +8.63% | 79.9K | -0.04 | -$16.03 | N/A |
| ROL | $43.27 | +1.10% | 20.8B | 37.96 | $1.14 | +1.66% |
| SCI | $75.78 | +4.27% | 10.5B | 19.65 | $3.86 | +1.81% |
| FTDR | $74.73 | +0.58% | 5.2B | 17.92 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $37.22 | +4.02% | 4.7B | 7.09 | $5.25 | +4.56% |
| CVSA | $127.53 | +2.71% | 4.3B | 16.30 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $70.14 | +4.83% | 3.7B | 15.23 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRNR vs ROL Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while ROL trades at $43.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check ROL's competition here
TRNR vs SCI Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while SCI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check SCI's competition here
TRNR vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while FTDR trades at $74.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check FTDR's competition here
TRNR vs HRB Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while HRB trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check HRB's competition here
TRNR vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while CVSA trades at $127.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check CVSA's competition here
TRNR vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while BFAM trades at $70.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check BFAM's competition here
TRNR vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check DSEY's competition here
TRNR vs MCW Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MCW's competition here
TRNR vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check ROVR's competition here
TRNR vs CSV Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 622.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while CSV trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check CSV's competition here
TRNR vs KLC Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 499.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while KLC trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check KLC's competition here
TRNR vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while FWDI trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check FWDI's competition here
TRNR vs EM Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check EM's competition here
TRNR vs MIN Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while MIN trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MIN's competition here
TRNR vs WW Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while WW trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check WW's competition here
TRNR vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while LGCY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check LGCY's competition here
TRNR vs MED Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while MED trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MED's competition here
TRNR vs RGS Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while RGS trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check RGS's competition here
TRNR vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check XSPA's competition here
TRNR vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while XWEL trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check XWEL's competition here
TRNR vs EJH Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while EJH trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check EJH's competition here
TRNR vs MRM Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while MRM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check MRM's competition here
TRNR vs BYAH Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 779.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while BYAH trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check BYAH's competition here
TRNR vs IVP Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check IVP's competition here
TRNR vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check NEBCU's competition here
TRNR vs STON Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check STON's competition here
TRNR vs TMX Comparison July 2026
TRNR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRNR stands at 79.9K. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNR is priced at $0.58, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRNR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, TRNR's ROE is -2.34%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNR is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNR.Check TMX's competition here