Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See EM's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for EM and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM | $1.20 | +0.00% | 303.1M | -119.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SCI | $82.33 | +3.77% | 11.4B | 21.33 | $3.86 | +1.65% |
| HRB | $40.83 | +2.20% | 5.2B | 7.78 | $5.25 | +4.09% |
| FTDR | $71.49 | +1.42% | 5B | 17.14 | $4.17 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CSV | $38.96 | +3.15% | 618.2M | 12.56 | $3.10 | +1.16% |
| FWDI | $3.89 | -8.69% | 286.9M | -0.14 | -$27.01 | N/A |
| WW | $13.34 | -1.55% | 133.4M | -1.99 | -$6.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Service Corporation International (NYSE: SCI)
EM vs SCI Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while SCI trades at $82.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check SCI's competition here
H&R Block, Inc. (NYSE: HRB)
EM vs HRB Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while HRB trades at $40.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check HRB's competition here
Frontdoor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTDR)
EM vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while FTDR trades at $71.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check FTDR's competition here
Diversey Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: DSEY)
EM vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check DSEY's competition here
Mister Car Wash, Inc. (NASDAQ: MCW)
EM vs MCW Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MCW's competition here
Rover Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROVR)
EM vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check ROVR's competition here
Carriage Services, Inc. (NYSE: CSV)
EM vs CSV Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 618.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while CSV trades at $38.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check CSV's competition here
Forward Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: FWDI)
EM vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while FWDI trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check FWDI's competition here
WW International, Inc. (NASDAQ: WW)
EM vs WW Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while WW trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check WW's competition here
Regis Corporation (NASDAQ: RGS)
EM vs RGS Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while RGS trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check RGS's competition here
XpresSpa Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: XSPA)
EM vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check XSPA's competition here
E-Home Household Service Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: EJH)
EM vs EJH Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while EJH trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check EJH's competition here
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: MRM)
EM vs MRM Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while MRM trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MRM's competition here
Kandal M Venture Limited (NASDAQ: FMFC)
EM vs FMFC Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, FMFC has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while FMFC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas FMFC's P/E ratio is -25.22. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FMFC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to FMFC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check FMFC's competition here
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: IVP)
EM vs IVP Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IVP's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check IVP's competition here
Rover Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: NEBCU)
EM vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check NEBCU's competition here
StoneMor Inc. (NYSE: STON)
EM vs STON Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to STON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check STON's competition here
Terminix Global Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: TMX)
EM vs TMX Comparison July 2026
Smart Share Global Limited (NASDAQ: EM) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 303.1M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.20 on the NASDAQ, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -119.50, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check TMX's competition here