Smart Share Global Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EM
Smart Share Global Limited (EM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM | $1.17 | -0.85% | 147.7M | -116.50 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| ROL | $56.61 | +3.47% | 26.7B | 50.76 | $1.09 | +0.67% |
| SCI | $85.79 | +2.48% | 11.8B | 22.27 | $3.80 | +0.81% |
| BFAM | $81.70 | -4.19% | 4.7B | 25.30 | $3.36 | N/A |
| FTDR | $60.80 | -1.44% | 4.3B | 17.70 | $3.42 | N/A |
| CVSA | $108.90 | -7.52% | 4.1B | 17.35 | $6.79 | N/A |
| HRB | $31.28 | -3.17% | 4B | 7.36 | $4.28 | +2.60% |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.00 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 22.55 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EM vs ROL Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while ROL trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 50.76. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check ROL's competition here
EM vs SCI Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while SCI trades at $85.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check SCI's competition here
EM vs BFAM Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while BFAM trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check BFAM's competition here
EM vs FTDR Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while FTDR trades at $60.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check FTDR's competition here
EM vs CVSA Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while CVSA trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check CVSA's competition here
EM vs HRB Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while HRB trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check HRB's competition here
EM vs DSEY Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check DSEY's competition here
EM vs MCW Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while MCW trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MCW's competition here
EM vs ROVR Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check ROVR's competition here
EM vs CSV Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 764.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while CSV trades at $50.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check CSV's competition here
EM vs MED Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while MED trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MED's competition here
EM vs WW Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while WW trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas WW's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WW's ROE of -26.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check WW's competition here
EM vs RGS Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while RGS trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check RGS's competition here
EM vs XSPA Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +35.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check XSPA's competition here
EM vs XWEL Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while XWEL trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check XWEL's competition here
EM vs MRM Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while MRM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check MRM's competition here
EM vs EJH Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while EJH trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check EJH's competition here
EM vs BYAH Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 745.2K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while BYAH trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check BYAH's competition here
EM vs TRNR Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 153.5K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while TRNR trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check TRNR's competition here
EM vs IVP Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check IVP's competition here
EM vs YYGH Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 25.4K. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while YYGH trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check YYGH's competition here
EM vs TMX Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check TMX's competition here
EM vs STON Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check STON's competition here
EM vs NEBCU Comparison April 2026
EM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EM stands at 147.7M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EM is priced at $1.17, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EM currently has a P/E ratio of -116.50, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EM's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EM is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EM.Check NEBCU's competition here