Terminix Global Holdings, Inc. (TMX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMX | $37.87 | -0.50% | 0 | 70.13 | $0.54 | N/A |
| ROL | $42.76 | +1.12% | 20.1B | 36.62 | $1.14 | +1.71% |
| SCI | $77.82 | +1.67% | 10.5B | 19.67 | $3.86 | +1.78% |
| FTDR | $79.69 | +4.82% | 5.4B | 18.61 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $40.11 | +4.95% | 4.8B | 7.25 | $5.25 | +4.36% |
| CVSA | $129.40 | +4.48% | 4.2B | 15.96 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $74.20 | +4.67% | 3.7B | 15.38 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMX vs ROL Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while ROL trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check ROL's competition here
TMX vs SCI Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while SCI trades at $77.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check SCI's competition here
TMX vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while FTDR trades at $79.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check FTDR's competition here
TMX vs HRB Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while HRB trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check HRB's competition here
TMX vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while CVSA trades at $129.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check CVSA's competition here
TMX vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while BFAM trades at $74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check BFAM's competition here
TMX vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check DSEY's competition here
TMX vs MCW Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check MCW's competition here
TMX vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check ROVR's competition here
TMX vs CSV Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while CSV trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check CSV's competition here
TMX vs KLC Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while KLC trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check KLC's competition here
TMX vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while FWDI trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check FWDI's competition here
TMX vs EM Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check EM's competition here
TMX vs MIN Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while MIN trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check MIN's competition here
TMX vs WW Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while WW trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check WW's competition here
TMX vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while LGCY trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check LGCY's competition here
TMX vs MED Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while MED trades at $10.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check MED's competition here
TMX vs RGS Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while RGS trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check RGS's competition here
TMX vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check XSPA's competition here
TMX vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while XWEL trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check XWEL's competition here
TMX vs EJH Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while EJH trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check EJH's competition here
TMX vs MRM Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while MRM trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check MRM's competition here
TMX vs TRNR Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while TRNR trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check TRNR's competition here
TMX vs BYAH Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 684.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while BYAH trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check BYAH's competition here
TMX vs IVP Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check IVP's competition here
TMX vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check NEBCU's competition here
TMX vs STON Comparison July 2026
TMX plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMX stands at 0. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMX is priced at $37.87, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMX currently has a P/E ratio of 70.13, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, TMX's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TMX is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMX.Check STON's competition here