Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (BYAH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BYAH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYAH | $0.90 | -23.08% | 684.2K | N/A | -$1,921.94 | N/A |
| ROL | $42.58 | +0.70% | 20.1B | 36.62 | $1.14 | +1.71% |
| SCI | $77.27 | +0.95% | 10.5B | 19.67 | $3.86 | +1.78% |
| FTDR | $78.68 | +3.48% | 5.4B | 18.61 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $39.64 | +3.72% | 4.8B | 7.25 | $5.25 | +4.36% |
| CVSA | $130.36 | +5.26% | 4.2B | 15.96 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $73.74 | +4.02% | 3.7B | 15.38 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BYAH vs ROL Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while ROL trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check ROL's competition here
BYAH vs SCI Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while SCI trades at $77.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check SCI's competition here
BYAH vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while FTDR trades at $78.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check FTDR's competition here
BYAH vs HRB Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while HRB trades at $39.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check HRB's competition here
BYAH vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while CVSA trades at $130.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check CVSA's competition here
BYAH vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while BFAM trades at $73.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check BFAM's competition here
BYAH vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check DSEY's competition here
BYAH vs MCW Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check MCW's competition here
BYAH vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check ROVR's competition here
BYAH vs CSV Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while CSV trades at $38.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check CSV's competition here
BYAH vs KLC Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while KLC trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check KLC's competition here
BYAH vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while FWDI trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check FWDI's competition here
BYAH vs EM Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check EM's competition here
BYAH vs MIN Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while MIN trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check MIN's competition here
BYAH vs WW Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while WW trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check WW's competition here
BYAH vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while LGCY trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check LGCY's competition here
BYAH vs MED Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while MED trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check MED's competition here
BYAH vs RGS Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while RGS trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check RGS's competition here
BYAH vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check XSPA's competition here
BYAH vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while XWEL trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check XWEL's competition here
BYAH vs EJH Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while EJH trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check EJH's competition here
BYAH vs MRM Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while MRM trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check MRM's competition here
BYAH vs TRNR Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while TRNR trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check TRNR's competition here
BYAH vs IVP Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check IVP's competition here
BYAH vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check NEBCU's competition here
BYAH vs STON Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check STON's competition here
BYAH vs TMX Comparison July 2026
BYAH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 684.2K. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $0.90, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -5.91%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check TMX's competition here