Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See BYAH's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for BYAH and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYAH | $2.60 | +9.24% | 1.9M | N/A | -$1,921.94 | N/A |
| PG | $146.13 | +0.59% | 347.4B | 21.06 | $6.94 | +2.96% |
| UL | $63.57 | +2.50% | 137B | 19.87 | $3.20 | +3.58% |
| CL | $87.89 | +1.26% | 70.3B | 23.44 | $3.75 | +2.42% |
| EL | $98.22 | +1.13% | 35.5B | 44.44 | $2.21 | +1.45% |
| KVUE | $17.91 | +0.73% | 34.4B | 15.19 | $1.18 | +4.68% |
| KMB | $99.09 | +0.96% | 32.9B | 13.30 | $7.45 | +5.18% |
| CHD | $94.58 | +0.46% | 22.4B | 26.56 | $3.56 | +1.30% |
| CLX | $89.31 | +1.77% | 10.8B | 16.12 | $5.54 | +5.68% |
| ELF | $96.76 | -0.15% | 5.7B | 24.24 | $3.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
The Procter & Gamble Company (NYSE: PG)
BYAH vs PG Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while PG trades at $146.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check PG's competition here
Unilever PLC (NYSE: UL)
BYAH vs UL Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while UL trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check UL's competition here
Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE: CL)
BYAH vs CL Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while CL trades at $87.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CL's ROE of +6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check CL's competition here
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (NYSE: EL)
BYAH vs EL Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while EL trades at $98.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EL's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to EL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check EL's competition here
Kenvue Inc. (NYSE: KVUE)
BYAH vs KVUE Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while KVUE trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check KVUE's competition here
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ: KMB)
BYAH vs KMB Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while KMB trades at $99.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check KMB's competition here
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (NYSE: CHD)
BYAH vs CHD Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while CHD trades at $94.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check CHD's competition here
The Clorox Company (NYSE: CLX)
BYAH vs CLX Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while CLX trades at $89.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CLX's ROE of -18.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check CLX's competition here
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (NYSE: ELF)
BYAH vs ELF Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while ELF trades at $96.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check ELF's competition here
Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (NASDAQ: REYN)
BYAH vs REYN Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while REYN trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check REYN's competition here
Natura &Co Holding S.A. (NYSE: NTCO)
BYAH vs NTCO Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check NTCO's competition here
Inter Parfums, Inc. (NASDAQ: IPAR)
BYAH vs IPAR Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while IPAR trades at $112.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check IPAR's competition here
Newell Brands Inc. (NASDAQ: NWL)
BYAH vs NWL Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while NWL trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to NWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check NWL's competition here
Coty Inc. (NYSE: COTY)
BYAH vs COTY Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while COTY trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check COTY's competition here
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SPB)
BYAH vs SPB Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while SPB trades at $85.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check SPB's competition here
Edgewell Personal Care Company (NYSE: EPC)
BYAH vs EPC Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while EPC trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check EPC's competition here
Oddity Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: ODD)
BYAH vs ODD Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while ODD trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check ODD's competition here
Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE)
BYAH vs HELE Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 641M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while HELE trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check HELE's competition here
The Honest Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: HNST)
BYAH vs HNST Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 610.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while HNST trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check HNST's competition here
Magnera Corp (NYSE: MAGN)
BYAH vs MAGN Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MAGN has a market cap of 408M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while MAGN trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAGN's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to MAGN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to MAGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check MAGN's competition here
European Wax Center, Inc. (NASDAQ: EWCZ)
BYAH vs EWCZ Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check EWCZ's competition here
Yatsen Holding Limited (NYSE: YSG)
BYAH vs YSG Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while YSG trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -20.08. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check YSG's competition here
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: NUS)
BYAH vs NUS Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while NUS trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check NUS's competition here
Acme United Corporation (AMEX: ACU)
BYAH vs ACU Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 232M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while ACU trades at $60.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check ACU's competition here
Pitanium Limited (NASDAQ: PTNM)
BYAH vs PTNM Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check PTNM's competition here
Waldencast plc (NASDAQ: WALD)
BYAH vs WALD Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, WALD has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while WALD trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WALD's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WALD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to WALD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check WALD's competition here
Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: SLSN)
BYAH vs SLSN Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while SLSN trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 65.86. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SLSN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check SLSN's competition here
Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: GROV)
BYAH vs GROV Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while GROV trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to GROV's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check GROV's competition here
Waldencast plc (NASDAQ: WALDW)
BYAH vs WALDW Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, WALDW has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while WALDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WALDW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WALDW's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to WALDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check WALDW's competition here
Axil Brands, Inc. (AMEX: AXIL)
BYAH vs AXIL Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while AXIL trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check AXIL's competition here
United-Guardian, Inc. (NASDAQ: UG)
BYAH vs UG Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while UG trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check UG's competition here
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: DSY)
BYAH vs DSY Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while DSY trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to DSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check DSY's competition here
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: DSYWW)
BYAH vs DSYWW Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while DSYWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check DSYWW's competition here
Tantech Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ: TANH)
BYAH vs TANH Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while TANH trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check TANH's competition here
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: PHH)
BYAH vs PHH Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check PHH's competition here
Bruush Oral Care Inc. (NASDAQ: BRSH)
BYAH vs BRSH Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check BRSH's competition here
Instinct Bio Technical Co. Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BIOT)
BYAH vs BIOT Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BIOT has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while BIOT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BIOT's ROE of -1217.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to BIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check BIOT's competition here
Instinct Bio Technical Company Holdings Inc. Warrants (NASDAQ: BIOTW)
BYAH vs BIOTW Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BIOTW has a market cap of 90.8K. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while BIOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BIOTW's ROE of -1217.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to BIOTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check BIOTW's competition here
Bruush Oral Care Inc. (NASDAQ: BRSHW)
BYAH vs BRSHW Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check BRSHW's competition here
Summer Infant, Inc. (NASDAQ: SUMR)
BYAH vs SUMR Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check SUMR's competition here
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. (NASDAQ: RDEN)
BYAH vs RDEN Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check RDEN's competition here
Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: GROV-WT)
BYAH vs GROV-WT Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check GROV-WT's competition here
Revlon, Inc. (NYSE: REV)
BYAH vs REV Comparison September 2026
Park Ha Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BYAH) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BYAH stands at 1.9M. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BYAH is priced at $2.60 on the NASDAQ, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BYAH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, BYAH's ROE is -1.74%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, BYAH is more volatile compared to REV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BYAH.Check REV's competition here