MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | $2.45 | +0.00% | 278.8M | 12.35 | $0.20 | +9.39% |
| ROL | $41.83 | -3.33% | 20.3B | 37.06 | $1.14 | +1.69% |
| SCI | $76.39 | +0.80% | 10.6B | 19.83 | $3.86 | +1.79% |
| FTDR | $76.91 | +2.91% | 5.3B | 18.23 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $38.39 | +3.14% | 4.8B | 7.28 | $5.25 | +4.41% |
| CVSA | $126.60 | -0.73% | 4.2B | 15.84 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $71.26 | +1.59% | 3.7B | 15.39 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MIN vs ROL Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while ROL trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check ROL's competition here
MIN vs SCI Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while SCI trades at $76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check SCI's competition here
MIN vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while FTDR trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check FTDR's competition here
MIN vs HRB Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while HRB trades at $38.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check HRB's competition here
MIN vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while CVSA trades at $126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check CVSA's competition here
MIN vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while BFAM trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check BFAM's competition here
MIN vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check DSEY's competition here
MIN vs MCW Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check MCW's competition here
MIN vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check ROVR's competition here
MIN vs CSV Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while CSV trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check CSV's competition here
MIN vs KLC Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while KLC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check KLC's competition here
MIN vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while FWDI trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check FWDI's competition here
MIN vs EM Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check EM's competition here
MIN vs WW Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while WW trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check WW's competition here
MIN vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while LGCY trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check LGCY's competition here
MIN vs MED Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while MED trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check MED's competition here
MIN vs RGS Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while RGS trades at $27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check RGS's competition here
MIN vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check XSPA's competition here
MIN vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while XWEL trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check XWEL's competition here
MIN vs EJH Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while EJH trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check EJH's competition here
MIN vs MRM Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while MRM trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check MRM's competition here
MIN vs BYAH Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 779.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while BYAH trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check BYAH's competition here
MIN vs IVP Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check IVP's competition here
MIN vs TRNR Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 79.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while TRNR trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check TRNR's competition here
MIN vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check NEBCU's competition here
MIN vs STON Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check STON's competition here
MIN vs TMX Comparison July 2026
MIN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MIN stands at 278.8M. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MIN is priced at $2.45, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MIN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.35, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, MIN's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MIN is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MIN.Check TMX's competition here