Forward Industries, Inc.
Forward Industries, Inc. (FWDI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWDI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWDI | $4.07 | -4.24% | 7M | -0.13 | -$31.38 | N/A |
| NKE | $42.42 | -0.35% | 62.7B | 27.91 | $1.52 | +3.83% |
| DECK | $94.27 | -0.36% | 13.4B | 13.39 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $32.50 | +1.18% | 6B | 14.45 | $2.25 | N/A |
| CROX | $99.11 | +2.18% | 4.9B | -61.18 | -$1.62 | N/A |
| SHOO | $38.23 | -1.27% | 2.8B | 36.07 | $1.06 | +2.19% |
| WINA | $351.11 | -0.55% | 1.3B | 31.69 | $11.08 | +3.93% |
| WWW | $14.70 | -3.98% | 1.2B | 11.95 | $1.23 | +2.70% |
| CAL | $11.06 | +0.82% | 373.2M | -52.67 | -$0.21 | +2.53% |
Stock Comparison
FWDI vs NKE Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while NKE trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check NKE's competition here
FWDI vs DECK Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while DECK trades at $94.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check DECK's competition here
FWDI vs SKX Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SKX's competition here
FWDI vs BIRK Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while BIRK trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check BIRK's competition here
FWDI vs CROX Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while CROX trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -61.18. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check CROX's competition here
FWDI vs SHOO Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while SHOO trades at $38.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SHOO's competition here
FWDI vs WINA Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while WINA trades at $351.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WINA's competition here
FWDI vs WWW Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while WWW trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WWW's competition here
FWDI vs CAL Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while CAL trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to CAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check CAL's competition here
FWDI vs WEYS Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 323M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while WEYS trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WEYS's competition here
FWDI vs RCKY Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while RCKY trades at $34.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check RCKY's competition here
FWDI vs MAMK Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while MAMK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check MAMK's competition here
FWDI vs VRA Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while VRA trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check VRA's competition here
FWDI vs SORA Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while SORA trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to SORA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SORA's competition here
FWDI vs FORD Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check FORD's competition here
FWDI vs AREBW Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 326K. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while AREBW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AREBW's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check AREBW's competition here
FWDI vs AREB Comparison May 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.07, while AREB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.42%, compared to AREB's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check AREB's competition here