Rollins, Inc. (ROL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while SCI trades at $76.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check SCI's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while FTDR trades at $78.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check FTDR's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while HRB trades at $39.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check HRB's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while CVSA trades at $128.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check CVSA's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while BFAM trades at $73.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check BFAM's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while DSEY trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check DSEY's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while MCW trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check MCW's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while ROVR trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check ROVR's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while CSV trades at $38.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check CSV's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 569M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while KLC trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check KLC's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while FWDI trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check FWDI's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while EM trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check EM's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while MIN trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check MIN's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while WW trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check WW's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while LGCY trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check LGCY's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while MED trades at $11.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check MED's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while RGS trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check RGS's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while XSPA trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check XSPA's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while XWEL trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check XWEL's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while MRM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check MRM's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while EJH trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check EJH's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while TRNR trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check TRNR's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 623.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while BYAH trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check BYAH's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while IVP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check IVP's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check NEBCU's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while STON trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check STON's competition here

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 20.3B. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $42.14, while TMX trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 36.98, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.Check TMX's competition here