StoneMor Inc. (STON) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STON) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STON | $3.53 | +0.86% | 0 | -6.64 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| ROL | $41.74 | -1.28% | 20.1B | 36.62 | $1.14 | +1.71% |
| SCI | $75.96 | -0.76% | 10.5B | 19.67 | $3.86 | +1.78% |
| FTDR | $77.59 | +2.05% | 5.4B | 18.61 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $38.08 | -0.37% | 4.8B | 7.25 | $5.25 | +4.36% |
| CVSA | $124.66 | +0.65% | 4.2B | 15.96 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $70.88 | -0.01% | 3.7B | 15.38 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STON vs ROL Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while ROL trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check ROL's competition here
STON vs SCI Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while SCI trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check SCI's competition here
STON vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while FTDR trades at $77.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check FTDR's competition here
STON vs HRB Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while HRB trades at $38.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check HRB's competition here
STON vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while CVSA trades at $124.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check CVSA's competition here
STON vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while BFAM trades at $70.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check BFAM's competition here
STON vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check DSEY's competition here
STON vs MCW Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check MCW's competition here
STON vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check ROVR's competition here
STON vs CSV Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while CSV trades at $38.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check CSV's competition here
STON vs KLC Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 505.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while KLC trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check KLC's competition here
STON vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while FWDI trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check FWDI's competition here
STON vs EM Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check EM's competition here
STON vs MIN Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MIN trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check MIN's competition here
STON vs WW Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while WW trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check WW's competition here
STON vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 150.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while LGCY trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check LGCY's competition here
STON vs MED Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MED trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check MED's competition here
STON vs RGS Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while RGS trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check RGS's competition here
STON vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check XSPA's competition here
STON vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while XWEL trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check XWEL's competition here
STON vs EJH Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while EJH trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check EJH's competition here
STON vs MRM Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while MRM trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check MRM's competition here
STON vs TRNR Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while TRNR trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check TRNR's competition here
STON vs BYAH Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 684.2K. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while BYAH trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check BYAH's competition here
STON vs IVP Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check IVP's competition here
STON vs NEBCU Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check NEBCU's competition here
STON vs TMX Comparison July 2026
STON plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STON stands at 0. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STON is priced at $3.53, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STON currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, STON's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STON is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STON.Check TMX's competition here