Rover Group, Inc. (NEBCU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NEBCU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEBCU | $11.00 | +6.08% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ROL | $42.28 | -2.29% | 20.3B | 37.06 | $1.14 | +1.69% |
| SCI | $76.54 | +1.00% | 10.6B | 19.83 | $3.86 | +1.79% |
| FTDR | $76.03 | +1.74% | 5.3B | 18.23 | $4.17 | N/A |
| HRB | $38.22 | +2.69% | 4.8B | 7.28 | $5.25 | +4.41% |
| CVSA | $123.85 | -2.89% | 4.2B | 15.84 | $7.82 | N/A |
| BFAM | $70.89 | +1.07% | 3.7B | 15.39 | $4.61 | N/A |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.10 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 21.52 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NEBCU vs ROL Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while ROL trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check ROL's competition here
NEBCU vs SCI Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while SCI trades at $76.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check SCI's competition here
NEBCU vs FTDR Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while FTDR trades at $76.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check FTDR's competition here
NEBCU vs HRB Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while HRB trades at $38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRB's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check HRB's competition here
NEBCU vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while CVSA trades at $123.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check CVSA's competition here
NEBCU vs BFAM Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while BFAM trades at $70.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check BFAM's competition here
NEBCU vs DSEY Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check DSEY's competition here
NEBCU vs MCW Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MCW trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MCW's competition here
NEBCU vs ROVR Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check ROVR's competition here
NEBCU vs CSV Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while CSV trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check CSV's competition here
NEBCU vs KLC Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while KLC trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check KLC's competition here
NEBCU vs FWDI Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, FWDI has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while FWDI trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWDI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FWDI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to FWDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check FWDI's competition here
NEBCU vs EM Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 303.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while EM trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -119.50. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check EM's competition here
NEBCU vs MIN Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MIN has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MIN trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIN's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MIN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MIN's competition here
NEBCU vs WW Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while WW trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WW's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check WW's competition here
NEBCU vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while LGCY trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check LGCY's competition here
NEBCU vs MED Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MED trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MED's competition here
NEBCU vs RGS Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while RGS trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check RGS's competition here
NEBCU vs XSPA Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +24.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check XSPA's competition here
NEBCU vs XWEL Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while XWEL trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check XWEL's competition here
NEBCU vs EJH Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while EJH trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check EJH's competition here
NEBCU vs MRM Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MRM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MRM's competition here
NEBCU vs BYAH Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 779.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while BYAH trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check BYAH's competition here
NEBCU vs IVP Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check IVP's competition here
NEBCU vs TRNR Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 79.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while TRNR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check TRNR's competition here
NEBCU vs STON Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check STON's competition here
NEBCU vs TMX Comparison July 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check TMX's competition here