Rover Group, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NEBCU
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NEBCU
Rover Group, Inc. (NEBCU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NEBCU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEBCU | $11.00 | +6.08% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ROL | $56.23 | +2.78% | 26.7B | 50.76 | $1.09 | +0.67% |
| SCI | $85.29 | +1.88% | 11.8B | 22.27 | $3.80 | +0.81% |
| BFAM | $82.03 | -3.81% | 4.7B | 25.30 | $3.36 | N/A |
| FTDR | $60.70 | -1.61% | 4.3B | 17.70 | $3.42 | N/A |
| CVSA | $108.64 | -7.74% | 4.1B | 17.35 | $6.79 | N/A |
| HRB | $31.30 | -3.11% | 4B | 7.36 | $4.28 | +2.60% |
| DSEY | $8.40 | +0.06% | 2.7B | -14.47 | -$0.58 | N/A |
| MCW | $7.00 | -0.07% | 2.3B | 22.55 | $0.31 | N/A |
| ROVR | $11.00 | +0.05% | 2B | 183.25 | $0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NEBCU vs ROL Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while ROL trades at $56.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 50.76. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check ROL's competition here
NEBCU vs SCI Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while SCI trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check SCI's competition here
NEBCU vs BFAM Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while BFAM trades at $82.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check BFAM's competition here
NEBCU vs FTDR Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while FTDR trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check FTDR's competition here
NEBCU vs CVSA Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while CVSA trades at $108.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check CVSA's competition here
NEBCU vs HRB Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while HRB trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check HRB's competition here
NEBCU vs DSEY Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while DSEY trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check DSEY's competition here
NEBCU vs MCW Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MCW trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MCW's competition here
NEBCU vs ROVR Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while ROVR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check ROVR's competition here
NEBCU vs CSV Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 764.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while CSV trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check CSV's competition here
NEBCU vs EM Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while EM trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -116.50. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check EM's competition here
NEBCU vs MED Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MED trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MED's competition here
NEBCU vs WW Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while WW trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WW's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WW's ROE of -26.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check WW's competition here
NEBCU vs RGS Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while RGS trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check RGS's competition here
NEBCU vs XSPA Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while XSPA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XSPA's ROE of +35.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check XSPA's competition here
NEBCU vs XWEL Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while XWEL trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check XWEL's competition here
NEBCU vs MRM Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while MRM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check MRM's competition here
NEBCU vs EJH Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while EJH trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EJH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check EJH's competition here
NEBCU vs BYAH Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 745.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while BYAH trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BYAH's ROE of -5.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check BYAH's competition here
NEBCU vs TRNR Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 153.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while TRNR trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check TRNR's competition here
NEBCU vs IVP Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 85.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while IVP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check IVP's competition here
NEBCU vs YYGH Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 25.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while YYGH trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check YYGH's competition here
NEBCU vs TMX Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while TMX trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check TMX's competition here
NEBCU vs STON Comparison April 2026
NEBCU plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NEBCU stands at 0. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEBCU is priced at $11.00, while STON trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NEBCU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, NEBCU's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NEBCU is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEBCU.Check STON's competition here