Sharps Technology, Inc.
Sharps Technology, Inc. STSSW Peers
See (STSSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STSSW | $0.03 | +26.10% | 22.6K | -0.02 | -$0.96 | N/A |
| MS | $139.75 | +1.47% | 224.2B | 16.38 | $8.53 | +2.65% |
| MS-PA | $21.55 | +0.51% | 219.1B | 2.74 | $7.86 | +2.65% |
| MS-PI | $25.21 | -0.04% | 218B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.65% |
| MS-PF | $25.44 | -0.04% | 217.9B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.65% |
| MS-PE | $25.57 | +0.16% | 217.7B | 3.26 | $7.86 | +2.65% |
| MS-PK | $23.87 | +0.34% | 216.1B | 3.04 | $7.86 | +2.65% |
| GS | $687.16 | +2.58% | 210.9B | 15.96 | $43.08 | +1.75% |
| GS-PC | $21.48 | +0.61% | 196B | 1.72 | $12.53 | +1.75% |
| GS-PA | $21.33 | +0.47% | 193.8B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.75% |
Stock Comparison
STSSW vs MS Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 224.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS trades at $139.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PA Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 219.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PA trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 218B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PI trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 217.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PF trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PE Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 217.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PE trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PK Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 216.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PK trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 210.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS trades at $687.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS-PC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 196B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS-PC trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS-PA Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS-PA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS-PD Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS-PD trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SCHW-PD Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SCHW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SCHW trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs IBKR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while IBKR trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS-PJ Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GS-PK Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PP trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PQ Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PQ trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs TW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while TW trades at $142.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 58.94. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PL trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs RJF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while RJF trades at $152.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs LPLA Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while LPLA trades at $364.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MS-PO Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MS-PO trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs NMR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while NMR trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs FUTU Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while FUTU trades at $123.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs HLI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while HLI trades at $182.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs JEF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while JEF trades at $56.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SF trades at $103.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs EVR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while EVR trades at $271.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs XP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while XP trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SF-PB Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SF-PB trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs FRHC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while FRHC trades at $144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 103.29. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SCE-PJ Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MKTX Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MKTX trades at $220.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs VIRT Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while VIRT trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MARA Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MARA trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.01. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs RJF-PA Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs RJF-PB Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while RJF-PB trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs PIPR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while PIPR trades at $280.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BGC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BGC trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MC trades at $62.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs LAZ Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while LAZ trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SNEX Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SNEX trades at $90.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs PJT Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while PJT trades at $166.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs IREN Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while IREN trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -42.29. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MRX Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MRX trades at $40.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SF-PC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SF-PC trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs HUT Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while HUT trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -28.30. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SF-PD Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SF-PD trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BGCP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs PWP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while PWP trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -93.24. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs TIGR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while TIGR trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs DFIN Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while DFIN trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs WULF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while WULF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.91. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs HKIB Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs CIFR Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while CIFR trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs CIFRW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while CIFRW trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs COWN Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs AC Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 793.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while AC trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs OPY Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 684.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while OPY trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs AMRK Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while AMRK trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs FUFU Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 515.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while FUFU trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 316.00. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs FUFUW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 500.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while FUFUW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BITF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 442.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BITF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BTBT Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 415M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BTBT trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BTM Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 358.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BTM trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -37.20. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs HIVE Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 322.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while HIVE trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -35.80. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GHL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SIEB Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SIEB trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SWIN Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SWIN trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs WHG Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while WHG trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 401.25. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs PROP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while PROP trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs CLSKW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 116.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while CLSKW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs TCJH Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SRL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SRL trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs HGBL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while HGBL trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GRDI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GRYP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GRYP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs BTCS Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while BTCS trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs TOP Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MDBH Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MDBH trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SDIG Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GSIW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GSIW trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs PLUT Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while PLUT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs ARBK Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while ARBK trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs WAI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while WAI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs COHN Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while COHN trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SAI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GREE Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GREE trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs NCPL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while NCPL trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs ABTS Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while ABTS trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MIGI Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MIGI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs NCPLW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs ATIF Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MEGL Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MEGL trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs LGHLW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs GRDIW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs SAITW Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.
STSSW vs MFH Comparison
STSSW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STSSW stands at 22.6K. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 718.3K. Regarding current trading prices, STSSW is priced at $0.03, while MFH trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STSSW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -50.75. In terms of profitability, STSSW's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STSSW is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STSSW.