Siebert Financial Corp.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 203.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS trades at $127.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 195.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PA trades at $21.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 195.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PI trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 195.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PF trades at $25.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 194.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PE trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 194.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PK trades at $22.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 181.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS trades at $591.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 174.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS-PA trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 174.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS-PC trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 174.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS-PD trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 154.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SCHW trades at $85.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 153.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 83.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while IBKR trades at $197.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PQ trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PP trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 33.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while TW trades at $141.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PL trades at $19.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while RJF trades at $151.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while LPLA trades at $376.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MS-PO trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 17.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while NMR trades at $5.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 15.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while FUTU trades at $110.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while HLI trades at $177.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while JEF trades at $54.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SF trades at $98.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while FRHC trades at $160.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while XP trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SF-PB trades at $23.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 9.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while EVR trades at $232.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MKTX trades at $218.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MARA trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while RJF-PB trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while PIPR trades at $265.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BGC trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MC trades at $60.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while LAZ trades at $45.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SNEX trades at $87.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while VIRT trades at $42.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while PJT trades at $149.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MRX trades at $47.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while CLSKW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SF-PC trades at $23.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SF-PD trades at $18.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BGCP trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while TIGR trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while IREN trades at $7.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while PWP trades at $18.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -89.90. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while HUT trades at $15.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while HKIB trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while DFIN trades at $54.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while WULF trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while CIFR trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while COWN trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 765.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while AC trades at $36.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 651.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while OPY trades at $62.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 610.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while FUFU trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 552.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BITF trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.38. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 502.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while AMRK trades at $21.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 438.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BTBT trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 404.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MFH trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -90.71. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 292.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while HIVE trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GHL trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 144.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while CIFRW trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 141.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while WHG trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 376.75. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 111.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SRL trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 104.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BTM trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 98.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GRYP trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while TCJH trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 76.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while HGBL trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GRDI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 49.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while TOP trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 42.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MDBH trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 42.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while BTCS trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -26.12. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SDIG trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 34.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while PLUT trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -48.80. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 30.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SWIN trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 22.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while ARBK trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SAI trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while COHN trades at $8.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 17.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while WAI trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 16.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GREE trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 13.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MIGI trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 12.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GSIW trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 8.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while ABTS trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while ATIF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while MEGL trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 5.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while LGHLW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while NCPL trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while SAITW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 43229.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while LGHL trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.

SIEB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SIEB stands at 95.89M. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, SIEB is priced at $2.39, while STSSW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SIEB currently has a P/E ratio of 9.19, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SIEB's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SIEB is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIEB.