Raymond James Financial, Inc.
Raymond James Financial, Inc. RJF-PA Peers
See (RJF-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RJF-PA | $25.04 | +0.28% | 5.4B | 3.54 | $7.08 | +1.26% |
| MS | $140.86 | +0.00% | 226.3B | 16.54 | $8.53 | +2.62% |
| MS-PA | $21.33 | +0.00% | 219.2B | 2.74 | $7.86 | +2.62% |
| MS-PI | $24.80 | +0.00% | 216.9B | 3.19 | $7.86 | +2.62% |
| GS | $707.75 | +0.00% | 216.8B | 16.40 | $43.08 | +1.70% |
| MS-PE | $25.23 | +0.00% | 216.1B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +2.62% |
| MS-PF | $25.13 | +0.00% | 215.8B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.62% |
| MS-PK | $23.40 | +0.00% | 215.1B | 3.02 | $7.86 | +2.62% |
| GS-PD | $20.75 | +0.00% | 205.7B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.70% |
| GS-PA | $21.16 | +0.00% | 205.5B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
RJF-PA vs MS Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS trades at $140.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PA Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 219.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PI trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 216.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS trades at $707.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PE Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 216.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PE trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 215.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PK Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 215.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PK trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS-PD Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 205.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS-PD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS-PA Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS-PA trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS-PC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS-PC trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SCHW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SCHW trades at $91.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GS-PK Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PQ trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PP trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs TW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while TW trades at $146.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PL trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs RJF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while RJF trades at $153.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs LPLA Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while LPLA trades at $374.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MS-PO Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs IBKR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while IBKR trades at $55.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs NMR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while NMR trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs HLI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while HLI trades at $179.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs JEF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while JEF trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SF trades at $103.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SF-PB Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SF-PB trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs EVR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while EVR trades at $270.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs XP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while XP trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs FRHC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while FRHC trades at $146.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 101.39. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MKTX Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MKTX trades at $223.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.73. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs VIRT Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while VIRT trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MARA Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MARA trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BGC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BGC trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while RJF-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs PIPR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while PIPR trades at $277.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MC trades at $62.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs LAZ Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while LAZ trades at $47.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SNEX Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SNEX trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs PJT Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while PJT trades at $165.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs IREN Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while IREN trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -49.13. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MRX Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MRX trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SF-PC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SF-PC trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs FUTU Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while FUTU trades at $123.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs HUT Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while HUT trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs CIFRW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while CIFRW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SF-PD Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SF-PD trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs PWP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while PWP trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -93.95. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BGCP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs DFIN Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while DFIN trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs WULF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while WULF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs CIFR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while CIFR trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs TIGR Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while TIGR trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs HKIB Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs COWN Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs AC Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 799.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while AC trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs OPY Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while OPY trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs FUFUW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 554.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs AMRK Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 553.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while AMRK trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs FUFU Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while FUFU trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 326.00. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BTBT Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BTBT trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BITF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BITF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs HIVE Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while HIVE trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -103.50. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BTM Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BTM trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GHL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SIEB Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SIEB trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SWIN Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SWIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs WHG Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while WHG trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 393.88. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs PROP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while PROP trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs CLSKW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs TCJH Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SRL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SRL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs HGBL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while HGBL trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GRDI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GRYP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GRYP trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs BTCS Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while BTCS trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs TOP Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MDBH Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MDBH trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SDIG Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GSIW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GSIW trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs PLUT Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while PLUT trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs WAI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while WAI trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs ARBK Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while ARBK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs COHN Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while COHN trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.55. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs NCPL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while NCPL trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GREE Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GREE trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SAI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs ABTS Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while ABTS trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MIGI Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MIGI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs ATIF Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MEGL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MEGL trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs NCPLW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs LGHLW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs GRDIW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs SAITW Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs MFH Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 757.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while MFH trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -53.50. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.
RJF-PA vs LGHL Comparison
RJF-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RJF-PA stands at 5.4B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 325.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RJF-PA is priced at $25.04, while LGHL trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RJF-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RJF-PA's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RJF-PA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RJF-PA.