Perfect Corp.
Perfect Corp. PERF-WT Peers
See (PERF-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERF-WT | $0.04 | -10.15% | 145.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | $304.10 | +1.00% | 354.9B | 54.52 | $5.58 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $272.69 | -0.27% | 260.6B | 42.59 | $6.40 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $787.63 | +1.42% | 219.7B | 64.30 | $12.25 | +0.51% |
| NOW | $1,028.08 | +0.55% | 212.9B | 139.43 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $93.30 | +1.93% | 195B | 16.33 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $115.35 | +1.50% | 150.2B | 93.78 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $350.08 | +4.88% | 118.5B | 63.31 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $404.23 | +5.30% | 110.5B | -18.17 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $308.15 | +0.97% | 84.1B | 78.01 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PERF-WT vs SAP Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 354.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SAP trades at $304.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.52. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CRM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 260.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CRM trades at $272.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs INTU Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 219.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while INTU trades at $787.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 64.30. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs NOW Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 212.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while NOW trades at $1,028.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 139.43. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs UBER Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 195B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while UBER trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SHOP Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SHOP trades at $115.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 93.78. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs APP Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while APP trades at $350.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 63.31. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs MSTR Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while MSTR trades at $404.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CDNS Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CDNS trades at $308.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 78.01. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SNOW Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SNOW trades at $223.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -53.24. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ADSK Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ADSK trades at $309.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 66.29. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs WDAY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while WDAY trades at $240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.60. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs TEAM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while TEAM trades at $203.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.08. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DDOG Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DDOG trades at $134.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 285.81. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs FICO Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while FICO trades at $1,827.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.45. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs TTD Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while TTD trades at $71.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 87.79. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ANSS Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ANSS trades at $351.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 52.19. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs STRK Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while STRK trades at $121.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs HUBS Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while HUBS trades at $556.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1295.09. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs STRF Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while STRF trades at $113.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs TYL Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while TYL trades at $592.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 89.23. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ZM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ZM trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PTC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PTC trades at $172.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SSNC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SSNC trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs GRAB Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while GRAB trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 503.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs GWRE Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while GWRE trades at $235.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 547.44. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DUOL Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DUOL trades at $410.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 202.98. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs AZPN Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DT trades at $55.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs MNDY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while MNDY trades at $314.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 311.37. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BSY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BSY trades at $53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 69.19. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DOCU Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DOCU trades at $77.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PAYC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PAYC trades at $231.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs QXO Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while QXO trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -61.61. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs MANH Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while MANH trades at $197.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 56.42. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BKI Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs XM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CDAY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs NICE Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while NICE trades at $168.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PCOR Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PCOR trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -79.58. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs U Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while U trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.62. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PCTY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PCTY trades at $181.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs TTAN Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while TTAN trades at $107.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.81. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ESTC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ESTC trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -81.11. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DAY Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DAY trades at $55.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 346.31. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SRAD Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SRAD trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 140.40. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DSGX Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DSGX trades at $101.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.60. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs APPF Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while APPF trades at $230.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs NATI Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SMAR Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CVLT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CVLT trades at $174.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.15. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs OTEX Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while OTEX trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs GTLB Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while GTLB trades at $45.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 501.22. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs LYFT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while LYFT trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CWAN Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CWAN trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs COUP Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs QTWO Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while QTWO trades at $93.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -275.18. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs IDCC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while IDCC trades at $224.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs VERX Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while VERX trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -121.84. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BULL Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BULL trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DAVEW Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DAVEW trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs FROG Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while FROG trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.80. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs LIF Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while LIF trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 501.92. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BILL Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BILL trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2312.50. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PEGA Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PEGA trades at $54.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 50.12. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs GRND Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while GRND trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.85. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs FRSH Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while FRSH trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -62.12. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs SOUN Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while SOUN trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CVT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs INTA Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while INTA trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -215.08. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs RUMBW Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while RUMBW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PYCR Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs RIOT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while RIOT trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs RUM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while RUM trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs WK Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while WK trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.02. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PWSC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ZI Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ZETA Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ZETA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.96. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs DAVE Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while DAVE trades at $268.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 75.18. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BL Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BL trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs AYX Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ENV Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs INST Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CALX Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CALX trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -102.25. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs KC Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while KC trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs COMP Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while COMP trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.27. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs NCNO Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while NCNO trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.88. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs AGYS Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while AGYS trades at $114.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 139.80. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ASAN Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ASAN trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BRZE Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BRZE trades at $28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.82. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs BLKB Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while BLKB trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ALKT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALKT trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.46. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs CLSK Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while CLSK trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs GBTG Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while GBTG trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ALIT Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALIT trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.50. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs ALRM Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALRM trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PAR Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PAR trades at $69.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.20. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.
PERF-WT vs PRGS Comparison
PERF-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PERF-WT stands at 145.7M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PERF-WT is priced at $0.04, while PRGS trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PERF-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 50.27. In terms of profitability, PERF-WT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PERF-WT is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PERF-WT.