Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. PAG Peers
See (PAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAG | $162.41 | -0.45% | 10.7B | 11.45 | $14.19 | +2.92% |
| CPRT | $51.42 | -1.21% | 49.7B | 34.05 | $1.51 | N/A |
| KMX | $63.00 | +0.14% | 9.6B | 19.63 | $3.21 | N/A |
| LAD | $314.14 | +0.09% | 8.2B | 9.91 | $31.71 | +0.68% |
| AN | $182.66 | -0.09% | 6.9B | 10.83 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $423.82 | -0.85% | 5.5B | 12.09 | $35.05 | +0.45% |
| ABG | $226.21 | -1.05% | 4.4B | 10.77 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $49.14 | +0.41% | 3.9B | 13.76 | $3.57 | +1.46% |
| RUSHB | $51.70 | -0.19% | 3.8B | 14.48 | $3.57 | +1.46% |
| ACVA | $16.29 | -2.57% | 2.9B | -37.02 | -$0.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PAG vs CPRT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CPRT trades at $51.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KMX Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while KMX trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LAD Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while LAD trades at $314.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs AN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while AN trades at $182.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs GPI Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while GPI trades at $423.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs ABG Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while ABG trades at $226.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while RUSHA trades at $49.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while RUSHB trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs ACVA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while ACVA trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -37.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs DRVN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while DRVN trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KAR Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while KAR trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 39.43. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SAH Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while SAH trades at $69.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CWH Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CWH trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -34.11. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CARS Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 638M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CARS trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs NWTN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while NWTN trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CANG Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 481.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CANG trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -154.67. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CRMT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 394.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CRMT trades at $47.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 47.32. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KFS Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while KFS trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -33.28. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SDA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while SDA trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LAZY Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RMBL Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while RMBL trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs JZXN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while JZXN trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs AZI Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while AZI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs GORV Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while GORV trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CZOO Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs NWTNW Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while NWTNW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs UCAR Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while UCAR trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KXIN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while KXIN trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs VRM Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while VRM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CTNT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while CTNT trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SFT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs UXIN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while UXIN trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LMPX Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 666.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while LMPX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LOTZW Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LOTZ Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 10.7B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $162.41, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 11.45, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.