Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. PAG Peers
See (PAG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAG | $183.07 | -0.57% | 12.1B | 12.90 | $14.18 | +2.60% |
| CPRT | $47.46 | -1.10% | 45.9B | 31.42 | $1.51 | N/A |
| KMX | $64.34 | -3.88% | 9.7B | 17.77 | $3.62 | N/A |
| LAD | $350.51 | -1.71% | 9.1B | 11.05 | $31.71 | +0.76% |
| AN | $212.86 | -0.92% | 8B | 12.61 | $16.87 | N/A |
| GPI | $477.22 | -0.61% | 6.2B | 13.40 | $35.62 | +0.51% |
| ABG | $263.22 | -1.03% | 5.2B | 12.54 | $21.00 | N/A |
| RUSHA | $53.69 | -0.74% | 4.2B | 15.04 | $3.57 | +1.35% |
| RUSHB | $54.02 | -2.60% | 4.1B | 15.13 | $3.57 | +1.35% |
| SAH | $88.25 | +0.90% | 3B | 12.58 | $7.02 | +1.87% |
Stock Comparison
PAG vs CPRT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CPRT trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KMX Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KMX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while KMX trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas KMX's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LAD Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LAD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while LAD trades at $350.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LAD's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs AN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while AN trades at $212.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas AN's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is more volatile compared to AN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs GPI Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GPI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while GPI trades at $477.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas GPI's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs ABG Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ABG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while ABG trades at $263.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas ABG's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ABG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RUSHA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while RUSHA trades at $53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas RUSHA's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUSHA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RUSHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RUSHB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while RUSHB trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas RUSHB's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUSHB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RUSHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SAH Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SAH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while SAH trades at $88.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SAH's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SAH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs ACVA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ACVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while ACVA trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas ACVA's P/E ratio is -36.58. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACVA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to ACVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs DRVN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DRVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while DRVN trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas DRVN's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRVN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to DRVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KAR Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while KAR trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas KAR's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CWH Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CWH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CWH trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CWH's P/E ratio is -36.60. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CWH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs UXIN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UXIN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while UXIN trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas UXIN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UXIN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CARS Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CARS has a market cap of 791.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CARS trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CARS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CARS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CARS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CANG Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CANG has a market cap of 552.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CANG trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CANG's P/E ratio is -177.33. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CANG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs NWTN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NWTN has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while NWTN trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas NWTN's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWTN's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs NWTNW Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NWTNW has a market cap of 497.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while NWTNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas NWTNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NWTNW's ROE of -7.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to NWTNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CRMT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CRMT has a market cap of 490M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CRMT trades at $59.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CRMT's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CRMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KFS Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KFS has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while KFS trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas KFS's P/E ratio is -37.31. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KFS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SDA Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SDA has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while SDA trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SDA's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDA's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs RMBL Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RMBL has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while RMBL trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas RMBL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RMBL's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to RMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LAZY Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LAZY has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while LAZY trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LAZY's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAZY's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs VRM Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while VRM trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRM's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs AZI Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AZI has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while AZI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas AZI's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to AZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CZOO Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CZOO has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CZOO trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CZOO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CZOO's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs GORV Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GORV has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while GORV trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas GORV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GORV's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to GORV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs UCAR Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, UCAR has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while UCAR trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas UCAR's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UCAR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to UCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs JZXN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, JZXN has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while JZXN trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas JZXN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JZXN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to JZXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs KXIN Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KXIN has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while KXIN trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas KXIN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KXIN's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to KXIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs CTNT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CTNT has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while CTNT trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas CTNT's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTNT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to CTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs SFT Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SFT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while SFT trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas SFT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFT's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to SFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LMPX Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LMPX has a market cap of 272.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while LMPX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LMPX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LOTZ Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LOTZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while LOTZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LOTZ's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOTZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.
PAG vs LOTZW Comparison
PAG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PAG stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LOTZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PAG is priced at $183.07, while LOTZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PAG currently has a P/E ratio of 12.90, whereas LOTZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PAG's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LOTZW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PAG is less volatile compared to LOTZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PAG.