Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley MS Peers
See (MS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | $142.96 | +2.09% | 227.3B | 16.09 | $8.84 | +2.60% |
| MS-PE | $25.46 | +0.04% | 224.8B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PA | $21.76 | -0.10% | 224.5B | 2.77 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PI | $25.06 | +0.04% | 224.4B | 3.19 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PF | $25.20 | -0.24% | 224.3B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PK | $23.86 | -0.67% | 223.5B | 3.04 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| GS | $722.62 | +3.17% | 220.2B | 15.80 | $45.40 | +1.67% |
| GS-PA | $22.03 | +0.14% | 217B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.67% |
| GS-PC | $21.82 | -0.46% | 216.1B | 1.75 | $12.53 | +1.67% |
| GS-PD | $21.56 | -0.23% | 215.7B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.67% |
Stock Comparison
MS vs MS-PE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 224.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PE trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 224.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PA trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 224.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PI trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 224.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 223.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PK trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 220.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS trades at $722.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS-PA trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 216.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS-PC trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 215.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS-PD trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 174.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 172.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SCHW trades at $96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PQ trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PP trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while RJF trades at $167.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while TW trades at $138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 56.23. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PL trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LPLA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while LPLA trades at $379.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MS-PO trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IBKR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while IBKR trades at $64.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NMR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while NMR trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HLI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while HLI trades at $197.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JEF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while JEF trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EVR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while EVR trades at $301.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SF trades at $111.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SF-PB trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FRHC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while FRHC trades at $171.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 120.96. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs XP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while XP trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MKTX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MKTX trades at $214.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs VIRT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while VIRT trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MARA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MARA trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PIPR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while PIPR trades at $315.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MC trades at $70.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LAZ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while LAZ trades at $54.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF-PB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while RJF-PB trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BGC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BGC trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SNEX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SNEX trades at $95.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IREN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while IREN trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -61.26. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PJT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while PJT trades at $186.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUTU Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while FUTU trades at $167.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MRX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MRX trades at $38.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HUT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while HUT trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -32.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SF-PC trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIFRW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while CIFRW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIFR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while CIFR trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WULF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while WULF trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TIGR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while TIGR trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PWP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while PWP trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -100.05. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SF-PD trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DFIN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while DFIN trades at $63.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BGCP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HKIB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs COWN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTBT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BTBT trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUFUW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 799.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while FUFUW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 790.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while AC trades at $37.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs OPY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 762.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while OPY trades at $72.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BITF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 706.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BITF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUFU Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while FUFU trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 408.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AMRK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 557.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while AMRK trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HIVE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while HIVE trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs COHN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while COHN trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SWIN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 216.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SWIN trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PROP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while PROP trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WHG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 168.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while WHG trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 450.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SIEB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SIEB trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTCS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BTCS trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MFH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MFH trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -25.06. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTM Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while BTM trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -36.53. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CLSKW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 112.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while CLSKW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SRL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SRL trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRYP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GRYP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TCJH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HGBL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while HGBL trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRDI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PLUT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while PLUT trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -62.20. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TOP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SDIG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MDBH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MDBH trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GREE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GREE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ARBK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while ARBK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SAI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NCPLW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NCPL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while NCPL trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ABTS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while ABTS trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MIGI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MIGI trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ATIF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MEGL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while MEGL trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GSIW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GSIW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WAI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while WAI trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LGHLW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRDIW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SAITW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LGHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 227.3B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 326.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $142.96, while LGHL trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.