Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley MS Peers
See (MS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
MS vs MS-PE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 191.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PI trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 191.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 191.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PK trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 190.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PA trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 174.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS-PA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 173.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS trades at $566.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 173.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS-PD trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 172.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS-PC trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 157.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SCHW trades at $84.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IBKKF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IBKR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 78.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IBKR trades at $185.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GS-PK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MQBKY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 50.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MQBKY trades at $132.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIIHY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CIIHY trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIIHF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 48.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MCQEF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PQ trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PP trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GUOSF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TW trades at $147.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PL trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RJF trades at $145.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LPLA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LPLA trades at $360.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MS-PO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HTNGF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NRSCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NMR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NMR trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HUATF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CMSQY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CMSQY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUTU Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FUTU trades at $102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CMSQF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HLI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HLI trades at $173.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CNICF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HAITY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JEF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JEF trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs XP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while XP trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SF-PB trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FRHC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FRHC trades at $156.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SF trades at $91.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DSECF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DSEEY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DSEEY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MKTX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MKTX trades at $231.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EVR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while EVR trades at $216.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WSOUF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BRPHF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BRPHF trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MARA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MARA trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF-PA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IVTJF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RJF-PB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IGGHY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IVTJY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BGC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BGC trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PIPR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PIPR trades at $251.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SNEX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SNEX trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IGGRF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CLPE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MC trades at $54.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LAZ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LAZ trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs VIRT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while VIRT trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PJT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PJT trades at $144.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MRX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MRX trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CGXYY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LTSAP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CLSKW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CLSKW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PLSQF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SF-PC trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TCAPF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LTSA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SF-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SF-PD trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BGCP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FNNTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TIGR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TIGR trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IREN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IREN trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PWP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PWP trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -84.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HKIB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DFIN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DFIN trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HUT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HUT trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MAUSY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NHMAF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MNXBF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DEFTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DEFTF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WULF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WULF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CFNCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIFR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CIFR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs COWN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 775.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while AC trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LKADF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CBGPY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 666.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CBGPY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CCORF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 654.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CCORF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs OPY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 636.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while OPY trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUFU Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FUFU trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PHIG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PHIG trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PHIGW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BITF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 547.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BITF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CBGPF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FUFUW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 520.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AMRK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 496.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while AMRK trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NAGGF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CNSRF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTBT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 423.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BTBT trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CYFRF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 392.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CYFRF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MFH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 387.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MFH trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CESTY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ABGSF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HIVE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 290.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HIVE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CESTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs APPCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs OSHDF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CSCHF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PROP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 199.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PROP trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ABIT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 190.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs OZFRY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NPPTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WHG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WHG trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PNPFF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 133.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PNPFF trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CIFRW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CIFRW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CAGPF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs STGC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SRL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SRL trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTM Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 108.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BTM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SIEB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SIEB trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CURN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CURN trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TCJH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GEVI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GEVI trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DGTLF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs XAUMF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while XAUMF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DYNA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HGBL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HGBL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRDI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HAFG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HAFG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTCS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BTCS trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ARCNF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs UFFRF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TOP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 44.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TOP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MDBH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MDBH trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SDIG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRYP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 36.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GRYP trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DMGGF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PLUT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PLUT trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CMZZF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SWIN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SWIN trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CRMZ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CFLSF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CBTTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BBKCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BBKCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EBML Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ARBKF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ARBK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 23.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ARBK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SMURF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ABTS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ABTS trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SAI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs COHN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while COHN trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WAI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WAI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BULT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BULT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FWAV Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GREE Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 14.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GREE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FFTTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BCNWF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AVFCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DPXCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FDCT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 11.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MIGI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MIGI trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ABSOF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GSIW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 10.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GSIW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MATEF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MATEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ATIF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ITEX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ITEX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MEGL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MEGL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTCWF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BLVDF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BKBLF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IHLDF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CCPUF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CSTXF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HYHDF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AAMTF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PHIL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NCPL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NCPL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BZRD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BIDCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CRKR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GBCHF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DBKSF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PIHG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PIHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BKLIF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NCPLW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs IFXY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while IFXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NSAV Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NSAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TRAA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TRAA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FNDM Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CBTC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TRAC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TRAC has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TRAC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TRAC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to TRAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRDIW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HAON Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HAON has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HAON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HAON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAON's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EQOSQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, EQOSQ has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while EQOSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas EQOSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQOSQ's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to EQOSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GRNBF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GRNBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs GMPW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, GMPW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while GMPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas GMPW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMPW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to GMPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BKLLF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BKLLF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BKLLF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BKLLF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKLLF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BKLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MGTI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MGTI has a market cap of 996268.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MGTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MGTI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGTI's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MXLGF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MXLGF has a market cap of 964416.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MXLGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MXLGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MXLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SAITW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MNTR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MNTR has a market cap of 954188.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MNTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MNTR's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BEGI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 927445.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BLQC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 927153.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BLQC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ICOA Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ICOA has a market cap of 848342.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ICOA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ICOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICOA's ROE of +64.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to ICOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MGHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MGHL has a market cap of 726109.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MGHL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MGHL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGHL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to MGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CSOL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CSOL has a market cap of 702311.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CSOL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CSOL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CSOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HIPH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 643962.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LGHLW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 480031.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CCTL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CCTL has a market cap of 373483.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCTL's ROE of -7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to CCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JTBK Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JTBK has a market cap of 369253.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JTBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JTBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTBK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to JTBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BYSD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BYSD has a market cap of 367954.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BYSD trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BYSD's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYSD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BYSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RDWD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RDWD has a market cap of 340331.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RDWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RDWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDWD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to RDWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs KGRI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, KGRI has a market cap of 317935.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while KGRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas KGRI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to KGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LNTO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LNTO has a market cap of 317503.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LNTO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LNTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNTO's ROE of +18.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LNTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BFCH Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BFCH has a market cap of 241318.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BFCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BFCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFCH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BFCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CBYI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CBYI has a market cap of 238986.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CBYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CBYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBYI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CBYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SOHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SOHL has a market cap of 228215.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SOHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SOHL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SOHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JMON Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JMON has a market cap of 175903.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JMON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JMON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to JMON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HYBOF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HYBOF has a market cap of 122760.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HYBOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HYBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYBOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HYBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BITCF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 121405.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BITCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BITCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LFAP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LFAP has a market cap of 117989.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LFAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LFAP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RGST Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RGST has a market cap of 85571.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RGST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RGST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to RGST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs VNTN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, VNTN has a market cap of 84884.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while VNTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas VNTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to VNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs TWCI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, TWCI has a market cap of 57476.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while TWCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas TWCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWCI's ROE of +9.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to TWCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs CNXS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, CNXS has a market cap of 52661.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while CNXS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas CNXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to CNXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NODC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NODC has a market cap of 42613.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NODC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NODC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NODC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LGHL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 40669.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LGHL trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs UMFG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, UMFG has a market cap of 36754.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while UMFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas UMFG's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to UMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs VTXB Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 32175.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while VTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to VTXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BTGN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BTGN has a market cap of 25361.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BTGN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BTGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTGN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BTGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs AXTG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, AXTG has a market cap of 24479.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while AXTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas AXTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to AXTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BGMO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BGMO has a market cap of 22777.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BGMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BGMO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to BGMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RAFFF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RAFFF has a market cap of 11417.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RAFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RAFFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RAFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs UCSO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, UCSO has a market cap of 8373.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while UCSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas UCSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCSO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to UCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WDBG Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WDBG has a market cap of 8325.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WDBG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WDBG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WDBG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WDBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs RMTN Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, RMTN has a market cap of 6049.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while RMTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas RMTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMTN's ROE of +4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to RMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NTFL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NTFL has a market cap of 6034.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NTFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NTFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTFL's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to NTFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs OFSI Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, OFSI has a market cap of 5112.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while OFSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas OFSI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OFSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to OFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs ATCC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, ATCC has a market cap of 2677.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while ATCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas ATCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to ATCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BLPFF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BLPFF has a market cap of 1194.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BLPFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BLPFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLPFF's ROE of -17.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs STSSW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while STSSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EZTD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 520.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while EZTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to EZTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs MERR Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, MERR has a market cap of 456.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while MERR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas MERR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MERR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to MERR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs WSFL Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, WSFL has a market cap of 274.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while WSFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas WSFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSFL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to WSFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs SYSX Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, SYSX has a market cap of 248.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while SYSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas SYSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYSX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to SYSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JRJCY Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JRJCY has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JRJCY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JRJCY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRJCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to JRJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LEHNQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LEHNQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LEHNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LEHNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEHNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to LEHNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LEHLQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LEHLQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LEHLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LEHLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEHLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to LEHLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JMP Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JMP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to JMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DSRO Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DSRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DSRO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DSRO's P/E ratio is -99.60. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSRO's ROE of +30.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to DSRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs LHHMQ Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, LHHMQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while LHHMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas LHHMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LHHMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to LHHMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs EQOS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, EQOS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while EQOS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas EQOS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to EQOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs FLTDF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, FLTDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while FLTDF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas FLTDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLTDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to FLTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PWPPW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PWPPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PWPPW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PWPPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWPPW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PWPPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs PIEJF Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, PIEJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while PIEJF trades at $39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas PIEJF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIEJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to PIEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs HVBT Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, HVBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while HVBT trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas HVBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HVBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to HVBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs DPW Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, DPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while DPW trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas DPW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to DPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs BETS Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, BETS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while BETS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas BETS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BETS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to BETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs NILE-PD Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, NILE-PD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while NILE-PD trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas NILE-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NILE-PD's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to NILE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs XPVVV Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, XPVVV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while XPVVV trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas XPVVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPVVV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is more volatile compared to XPVVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
MS vs JRJC Comparison
MS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS stands at 195.25B. In comparison, JRJC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS is priced at $121.70, while JRJC trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.27, whereas JRJC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRJC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS is less volatile compared to JRJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | $121.70 | -0.15% | 195.25B | 14.27 | $8.53 | +3.04% |
| MS-PE | $25.35 | +0.36% | 191.76B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PI | $24.51 | +0.25% | 191.54B | 3.12 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PF | $25.17 | +0.20% | 191.45B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PK | $22.97 | +0.04% | 191.16B | 2.92 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PA | $21.64 | -0.46% | 190.20B | 2.75 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| GS-PA | $21.67 | +0.32% | 174.14B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS | $566.70 | +0.18% | 173.89B | 13.15 | $43.10 | +2.07% |
| GS-PD | $21.79 | +0.05% | 173.66B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS-PC | $22.17 | -0.58% | 172.58B | 1.77 | $12.53 | +2.07% |