Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley MS-PK Peers
See (MS-PK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
MS-PK vs MS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 195.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS trades at $121.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PE Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 191.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PI trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 191.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 190.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PA trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS-PA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 174.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS-PA trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 173.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS trades at $566.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS-PD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 173.66B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS-PD trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS-PC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 172.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS-PC trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 157.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SCHW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SCHW trades at $84.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IBKKF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IBKR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 78.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IBKR trades at $185.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS-PJ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GS-PK Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MQBKY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 50.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MQBKY trades at $132.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CIIHY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CIIHY trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CIIHF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 48.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MCQEF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PQ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PQ trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PP trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GUOSF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TW trades at $147.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PL trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RJF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RJF trades at $145.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LPLA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LPLA trades at $360.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MS-PO Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HTNGF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NRSCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NMR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NMR trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HUATF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CMSQY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CMSQY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FUTU Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FUTU trades at $102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CMSQF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HLI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HLI trades at $173.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CNICF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HAITY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JEF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JEF trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs XP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while XP trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SF-PB Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SF-PB trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FRHC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FRHC trades at $156.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SF trades at $91.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DSECF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DSECF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DSEEY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DSEEY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MKTX Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MKTX trades at $231.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs EVR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while EVR trades at $216.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WSOUF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BRPHF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BRPHF trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MARA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MARA trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RJF-PA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IVTJF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RJF-PB Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IGGHY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IVTJY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BGC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BGC trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PIPR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PIPR trades at $251.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SNEX Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SNEX trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IGGRF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CLPE Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MC trades at $54.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LAZ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LAZ trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs VIRT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while VIRT trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PJT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PJT trades at $144.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MRX Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MRX trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CGXYY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LTSAP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CLSKW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CLSKW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PLSQF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SF-PC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SF-PC trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TCAPF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LTSA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SF-PD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SF-PD trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BGCP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FNNTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TIGR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TIGR trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IREN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IREN trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PWP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PWP trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -84.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HKIB Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DFIN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DFIN trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HUT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HUT trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MAUSY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NHMAF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MNXBF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DEFTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DEFTF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WULF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WULF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CFNCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CIFR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CIFR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs COWN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs AC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 775.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while AC trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LKADF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CBGPY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 666.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CBGPY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CCORF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 654.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CCORF trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs OPY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 636.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while OPY trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FUFU Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FUFU trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PHIG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PHIG trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PHIGW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BITF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 547.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BITF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CBGPF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FUFUW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 520.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs AMRK Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 496.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while AMRK trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NAGGF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CNSRF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BTBT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 423.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BTBT trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CYFRF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 392.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CYFRF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MFH Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 387.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MFH trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CESTY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ABGSF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HIVE Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 290.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HIVE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CESTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GHL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs APPCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs OSHDF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CSCHF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PROP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 199.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PROP trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ABIT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 190.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs OZFRY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NPPTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WHG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WHG trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PNPFF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 133.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PNPFF trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CIFRW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CIFRW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CAGPF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs STGC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SRL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SRL trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BTM Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 108.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BTM trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SIEB Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SIEB trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CURN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CURN trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TCJH Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GEVI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GEVI trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DGTLF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs XAUMF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while XAUMF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DYNA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HGBL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HGBL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GRDI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HAFG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HAFG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BTCS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BTCS trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ARCNF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs UFFRF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TOP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 44.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TOP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MDBH Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MDBH trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SDIG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GRYP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 36.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GRYP trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DMGGF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PLUT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PLUT trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CMZZF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SWIN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SWIN trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CRMZ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CFLSF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CBTTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BBKCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BBKCF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs EBML Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ARBKF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ARBK Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 23.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ARBK trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SMURF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ABTS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ABTS trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SAI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs COHN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while COHN trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WAI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WAI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BULT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BULT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FWAV Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GREE Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 14.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GREE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FFTTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BCNWF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs AVFCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DPXCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FDCT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 11.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FDCT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MIGI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MIGI trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ABSOF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GSIW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 10.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GSIW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MATEF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MATEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ATIF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ITEX Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ITEX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MEGL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MEGL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BTCWF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BLVDF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BKBLF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IHLDF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CCPUF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CSTXF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HYHDF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs AAMTF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PHIL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NCPL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NCPL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BZRD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BIDCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CRKR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GBCHF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DBKSF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PIHG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PIHG trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BKLIF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NCPLW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs IFXY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while IFXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NSAV Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NSAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TRAA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TRAA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FNDM Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FNDM trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CBTC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TRAC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TRAC has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TRAC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TRAC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to TRAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GRDIW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HAON Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HAON has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HAON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HAON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAON's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs EQOSQ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, EQOSQ has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while EQOSQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas EQOSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQOSQ's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to EQOSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GRNBF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GRNBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs GMPW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, GMPW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while GMPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas GMPW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMPW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to GMPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BKLLF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BKLLF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BKLLF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BKLLF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKLLF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BKLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MGTI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MGTI has a market cap of 996268.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MGTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MGTI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGTI's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to MGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MXLGF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MXLGF has a market cap of 964416.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MXLGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MXLGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MXLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SAITW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MNTR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MNTR has a market cap of 954188.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MNTR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MNTR's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to MNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BEGI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 927445.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BLQC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 927153.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BLQC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ICOA Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ICOA has a market cap of 848342.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ICOA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ICOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICOA's ROE of +64.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to ICOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MGHL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MGHL has a market cap of 726109.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MGHL trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MGHL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGHL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to MGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CSOL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CSOL has a market cap of 702311.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CSOL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CSOL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CSOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HIPH Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 643962.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LGHLW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 480031.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CCTL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CCTL has a market cap of 373483.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCTL's ROE of -7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to CCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JTBK Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JTBK has a market cap of 369253.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JTBK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JTBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTBK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to JTBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BYSD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BYSD has a market cap of 367954.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BYSD trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BYSD's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BYSD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BYSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RDWD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RDWD has a market cap of 340331.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RDWD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RDWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RDWD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to RDWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs KGRI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, KGRI has a market cap of 317935.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while KGRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas KGRI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KGRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to KGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LNTO Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LNTO has a market cap of 317503.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LNTO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LNTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LNTO's ROE of +18.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LNTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BFCH Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BFCH has a market cap of 241318.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BFCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BFCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFCH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BFCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CBYI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CBYI has a market cap of 238986.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CBYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CBYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBYI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CBYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SOHL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SOHL has a market cap of 228215.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SOHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SOHL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to SOHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JMON Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JMON has a market cap of 175903.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JMON trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JMON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to JMON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HYBOF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HYBOF has a market cap of 122760.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HYBOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HYBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYBOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HYBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BITCF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 121405.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BITCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BITCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LFAP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LFAP has a market cap of 117989.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LFAP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LFAP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RGST Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RGST has a market cap of 85571.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RGST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RGST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to RGST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs VNTN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, VNTN has a market cap of 84884.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while VNTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas VNTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VNTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to VNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs TWCI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, TWCI has a market cap of 57476.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while TWCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas TWCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWCI's ROE of +9.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to TWCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs CNXS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, CNXS has a market cap of 52661.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while CNXS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas CNXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to CNXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NODC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NODC has a market cap of 42613.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NODC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NODC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NODC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LGHL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 40669.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LGHL trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs UMFG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, UMFG has a market cap of 36754.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while UMFG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas UMFG's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to UMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs VTXB Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 32175.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while VTXB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to VTXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BTGN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BTGN has a market cap of 25361.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BTGN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BTGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTGN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BTGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs AXTG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, AXTG has a market cap of 24479.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while AXTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas AXTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to AXTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BGMO Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BGMO has a market cap of 22777.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BGMO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BGMO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to BGMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RAFFF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RAFFF has a market cap of 11417.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RAFFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RAFFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to RAFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs UCSO Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, UCSO has a market cap of 8373.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while UCSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas UCSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCSO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to UCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WDBG Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WDBG has a market cap of 8325.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WDBG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WDBG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WDBG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WDBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs RMTN Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, RMTN has a market cap of 6049.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while RMTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas RMTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMTN's ROE of +4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to RMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NTFL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NTFL has a market cap of 6034.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NTFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NTFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTFL's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to NTFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs OFSI Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, OFSI has a market cap of 5112.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while OFSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas OFSI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OFSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to OFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs ATCC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, ATCC has a market cap of 2677.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while ATCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas ATCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to ATCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BLPFF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BLPFF has a market cap of 1194.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BLPFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BLPFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLPFF's ROE of -17.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs STSSW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while STSSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs EZTD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 520.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while EZTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to EZTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs MERR Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, MERR has a market cap of 456.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while MERR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas MERR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MERR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to MERR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs WSFL Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, WSFL has a market cap of 274.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while WSFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas WSFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSFL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to WSFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs SYSX Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, SYSX has a market cap of 248.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while SYSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas SYSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYSX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to SYSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JRJCY Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JRJCY has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JRJCY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JRJCY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRJCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to JRJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LEHNQ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LEHNQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LEHNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LEHNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEHNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to LEHNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LEHLQ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LEHLQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LEHLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LEHLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEHLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to LEHLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JMP Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JMP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to JMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DSRO Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DSRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DSRO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DSRO's P/E ratio is -99.60. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DSRO's ROE of +30.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to DSRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs LHHMQ Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, LHHMQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while LHHMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas LHHMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LHHMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to LHHMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs EQOS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, EQOS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while EQOS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas EQOS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EQOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to EQOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs FLTDF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, FLTDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while FLTDF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas FLTDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLTDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to FLTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PWPPW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PWPPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PWPPW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PWPPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWPPW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to PWPPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs PIEJF Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, PIEJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while PIEJF trades at $39.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas PIEJF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIEJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to PIEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs HVBT Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, HVBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while HVBT trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas HVBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HVBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to HVBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs DPW Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, DPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while DPW trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas DPW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DPW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to DPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs BETS Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, BETS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while BETS trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas BETS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BETS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to BETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs NILE-PD Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, NILE-PD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while NILE-PD trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas NILE-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NILE-PD's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to NILE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs XPVVV Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, XPVVV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while XPVVV trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas XPVVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPVVV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is more volatile compared to XPVVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
MS-PK vs JRJC Comparison
MS-PK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PK stands at 191.16B. In comparison, JRJC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PK is priced at $22.97, while JRJC trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PK currently has a P/E ratio of 2.92, whereas JRJC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PK's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JRJC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PK is less volatile compared to JRJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PK.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | $121.70 | -0.15% | 195.25B | 14.27 | $8.53 | +3.04% |
| MS-PE | $25.35 | +0.36% | 191.76B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PI | $24.51 | +0.25% | 191.54B | 3.12 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PF | $25.17 | +0.20% | 191.45B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PK | $22.97 | +0.04% | 191.16B | 2.92 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| MS-PA | $21.64 | -0.46% | 190.20B | 2.75 | $7.86 | +3.04% |
| GS-PA | $21.67 | +0.32% | 174.14B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS | $566.70 | +0.18% | 173.89B | 13.15 | $43.10 | +2.07% |
| GS-PD | $21.79 | +0.05% | 173.66B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.07% |
| GS-PC | $22.17 | -0.58% | 172.58B | 1.77 | $12.53 | +2.07% |