Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley (MS-PI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MS-PI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PI | $25.23 | +0.04% | 67.3B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.25% |
| GS | $892.80 | -3.19% | 270.3B | 17.41 | $51.28 | +1.52% |
| MS | $166.86 | -4.87% | 265.2B | 16.34 | $10.21 | +2.25% |
| GS-PD | $20.02 | -0.45% | 213.1B | 0.39 | $51.53 | +1.52% |
| GS-PA | $19.95 | -1.48% | 206B | 0.39 | $51.53 | +1.52% |
| SCHW | $92.74 | -1.38% | 168.3B | 19.94 | $4.65 | +1.21% |
| MS-PA | $20.03 | -0.37% | 70.5B | 2.55 | $7.86 | +2.25% |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.52% |
| MS-PK | $24.85 | -0.16% | 67.5B | 3.16 | $7.86 | +2.25% |
| MS-PF | $25.31 | +0.06% | 65.4B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +2.25% |
Stock Comparison
MS-PI vs GS Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 270.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS trades at $892.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS's competition here
MS-PI vs MS Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 265.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS trades at $166.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS's competition here
MS-PI vs GS-PD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 213.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS-PD trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS-PD's competition here
MS-PI vs GS-PA Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS-PA trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS-PA's competition here
MS-PI vs SCHW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SCHW trades at $92.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SCHW's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PA Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PA trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PA's competition here
MS-PI vs GS-PJ Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS-PJ's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PK Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PK trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PK's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PF's competition here
MS-PI vs GS-PK Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS-PK's competition here
MS-PI vs HOOD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while HOOD trades at $71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check HOOD's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PE Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PE trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PE's competition here
MS-PI vs SCHW-PD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PQ Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PQ trades at $26.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PQ's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PP trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PP's competition here
MS-PI vs SCHW-PJ Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PL Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PL trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PL's competition here
MS-PI vs RJF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while RJF trades at $153.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check RJF's competition here
MS-PI vs MS-PO Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MS-PO trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MS-PO's competition here
MS-PI vs NMR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while NMR trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check NMR's competition here
MS-PI vs TW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while TW trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check TW's competition here
MS-PI vs LPLA Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while LPLA trades at $303.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check LPLA's competition here
MS-PI vs STRD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while STRD trades at $75.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check STRD's competition here
MS-PI vs FUTU Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while FUTU trades at $146.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check FUTU's competition here
MS-PI vs CRCL Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while CRCL trades at $61.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -71.15. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check CRCL's competition here
MS-PI vs IREN Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while IREN trades at $42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check IREN's competition here
MS-PI vs EVR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while EVR trades at $305.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check EVR's competition here
MS-PI vs SF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SF trades at $112.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SF's competition here
MS-PI vs XP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while XP trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check XP's competition here
MS-PI vs HLI Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while HLI trades at $163.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check HLI's competition here
MS-PI vs JEF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while JEF trades at $50.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check JEF's competition here
MS-PI vs SCE-PJ Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
MS-PI vs GS-PC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GS-PC trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GS-PC's competition here
MS-PI vs FRHC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while FRHC trades at $117.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 5888.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check FRHC's competition here
MS-PI vs MKTX Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MKTX trades at $181.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MKTX's competition here
MS-PI vs GLXY Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GLXY trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GLXY's competition here
MS-PI vs WULF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while WULF trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WULF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check WULF's competition here
MS-PI vs SNEX Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SNEX trades at $124.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SNEX's competition here
MS-PI vs CIFR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while CIFR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -89.53. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check CIFR's competition here
MS-PI vs VIRT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while VIRT trades at $39.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check VIRT's competition here
MS-PI vs HUT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while HUT trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check HUT's competition here
MS-PI vs RIOT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while RIOT trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIOT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check RIOT's competition here
MS-PI vs PIPR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while PIPR trades at $306.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check PIPR's competition here
MS-PI vs FIGR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while FIGR trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 116.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check FIGR's competition here
MS-PI vs RJF-PA Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check RJF-PA's competition here
MS-PI vs LAZ Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while LAZ trades at $49.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check LAZ's competition here
MS-PI vs MC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MC trades at $60.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MC's competition here
MS-PI vs BGC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BGC trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BGC's competition here
MS-PI vs SF-PB Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SF-PB trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SF-PB's competition here
MS-PI vs PJT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while PJT trades at $147.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check PJT's competition here
MS-PI vs BMNR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BMNR trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BMNR's competition here
MS-PI vs MIAX Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MIAX trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIAX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MIAX's competition here
MS-PI vs MARA Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MARA trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MARA's competition here
MS-PI vs MRX Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MRX trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MRX's competition here
MS-PI vs ETOR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while ETOR trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check ETOR's competition here
MS-PI vs SF-PC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SF-PC trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SF-PC's competition here
MS-PI vs SF-PD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SF-PD trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SF-PD's competition here
MS-PI vs PWP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while PWP trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check PWP's competition here
MS-PI vs BGCP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BGCP's competition here
MS-PI vs CIFRW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check CIFRW's competition here
MS-PI vs HKIB Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check HKIB's competition here
MS-PI vs GOLD Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GOLD trades at $56.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 118.71. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GOLD's competition here
MS-PI vs AMRK Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while AMRK trades at $57.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 192.57. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check AMRK's competition here
MS-PI vs TIGR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while TIGR trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check TIGR's competition here
MS-PI vs DFIN Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while DFIN trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check DFIN's competition here
MS-PI vs BITF Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BITF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BITF's competition here
MS-PI vs COWN Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check COWN's competition here
MS-PI vs ABTC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 904.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while ABTC trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check ABTC's competition here
MS-PI vs OPY Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 903.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while OPY trades at $86.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check OPY's competition here
MS-PI vs GEMI Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 690.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GEMI trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEMI's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GEMI's competition here
MS-PI vs AC Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check AC's competition here
MS-PI vs BTBT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BTBT trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BTBT's competition here
MS-PI vs BASG Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BASG has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BASG trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BASG's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BASG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BASG's competition here
MS-PI vs RJF-PB Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 430M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while RJF-PB trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check RJF-PB's competition here
MS-PI vs BTGO Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 403.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BTGO trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BTGO's competition here
MS-PI vs MFH Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check MFH's competition here
MS-PI vs FUFU Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while FUFU trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check FUFU's competition here
MS-PI vs GHL Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GHL's competition here
MS-PI vs DEFT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 203.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while DEFT trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 62.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEFT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check DEFT's competition here
MS-PI vs BRR Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BRR trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BRR's competition here
MS-PI vs BASV Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BASV has a market cap of 199.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BASV trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BASV's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BASV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BASV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BASV's competition here
MS-PI vs AXG Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while AXG trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -18.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check AXG's competition here
MS-PI vs SWIN Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SWIN's competition here
MS-PI vs WHG Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while WHG trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check WHG's competition here
MS-PI vs SRL Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SRL trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -65.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SRL's competition here
MS-PI vs SUIG Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 94.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SUIG trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SUIG's competition here
MS-PI vs CLSKW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while CLSKW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check CLSKW's competition here
MS-PI vs PROP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while PROP trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check PROP's competition here
MS-PI vs TCJH Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check TCJH's competition here
MS-PI vs SIEB Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SIEB trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SIEB's competition here
MS-PI vs BTCS Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while BTCS trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTCS's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check BTCS's competition here
MS-PI vs GRDI Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check GRDI's competition here
MS-PI vs TSLW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, TSLW has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while TSLW trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TSLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSLW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to TSLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check TSLW's competition here
MS-PI vs NVDW Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, NVDW has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while NVDW trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas NVDW's P/E ratio is 83.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NVDW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to NVDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check NVDW's competition here
MS-PI vs DOMH Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while DOMH trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOMH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check DOMH's competition here
MS-PI vs PLUT Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while PLUT trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -18.28. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check PLUT's competition here
MS-PI vs HGBL Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while HGBL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check HGBL's competition here
MS-PI vs SDIG Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check SDIG's competition here
MS-PI vs TOP Comparison February 2026
MS-PI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PI stands at 67.3B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PI is priced at $25.23, while TOP trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.21, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PI's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PI is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PI.Check TOP's competition here