Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley (MS-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PA | $21.97 | -0.14% | 236.3B | 2.80 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS | $148.51 | +0.51% | 237.1B | 16.80 | $8.84 | +2.54% |
| MS-PK | $24.14 | -0.45% | 236.5B | 3.08 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS-PF | $25.35 | -0.16% | 236.1B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS-PI | $25.17 | +0.00% | 236B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS-PE | $25.62 | -0.04% | 235.8B | 3.26 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| GS-PC | $21.64 | -0.32% | 226.4B | 1.73 | $12.53 | +1.61% |
| GS | $747.20 | +0.34% | 226.1B | 16.44 | $45.43 | +1.61% |
| GS-PA | $21.89 | -0.18% | 226.1B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.61% |
| GS-PD | $21.19 | -0.28% | 225.2B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
MS-PA vs MS Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 237.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS trades at $148.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 236.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PK trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PK's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 236.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PF's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 236B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PI trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PI's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 235.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PE trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PE's competition here
MS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS-PC trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PC's competition here
MS-PA vs GS Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 226.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS trades at $747.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS's competition here
MS-PA vs GS-PA Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 226.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS-PA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PA's competition here
MS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS-PD trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PD's competition here
MS-PA vs SCHW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 177.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SCHW trades at $97.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW's competition here
MS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
MS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PJ's competition here
MS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GS-PK's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PQ trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PQ's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PP trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PP's competition here
MS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
MS-PA vs RJF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while RJF trades at $164.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RJF's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PL trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PL's competition here
MS-PA vs TW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while TW trades at $130.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 50.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TW's competition here
MS-PA vs LPLA Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while LPLA trades at $355.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LPLA's competition here
MS-PA vs IBKR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while IBKR trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check IBKR's competition here
MS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MS-PO trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MS-PO's competition here
MS-PA vs NMR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while NMR trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NMR's competition here
MS-PA vs HLI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while HLI trades at $194.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HLI's competition here
MS-PA vs JEF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while JEF trades at $61.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check JEF's competition here
MS-PA vs EVR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while EVR trades at $313.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check EVR's competition here
MS-PA vs SF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SF trades at $115.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF's competition here
MS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SF-PB trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PB's competition here
MS-PA vs FRHC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while FRHC trades at $172.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FRHC's competition here
MS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SCE-PJ trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
MS-PA vs XP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while XP trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check XP's competition here
MS-PA vs MKTX Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MKTX trades at $187.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MKTX's competition here
MS-PA vs VIRT Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while VIRT trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check VIRT's competition here
MS-PA vs PIPR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while PIPR trades at $331.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PIPR's competition here
MS-PA vs MARA Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MARA trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MARA's competition here
MS-PA vs MC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MC trades at $74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MC's competition here
MS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RJF-PA's competition here
MS-PA vs LAZ Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while LAZ trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LAZ's competition here
MS-PA vs BGC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BGC trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGC's competition here
MS-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while RJF-PB trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check RJF-PB's competition here
MS-PA vs SNEX Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SNEX trades at $91.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SNEX's competition here
MS-PA vs IREN Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while IREN trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -61.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check IREN's competition here
MS-PA vs PJT Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while PJT trades at $183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PJT's ROE of +553.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PJT's competition here
MS-PA vs WULF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while WULF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -24.89. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WULF's competition here
MS-PA vs FUTU Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while FUTU trades at $174.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUTU's competition here
MS-PA vs MRX Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MRX trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MRX's competition here
MS-PA vs HUT Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while HUT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HUT's competition here
MS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SF-PC trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PC's competition here
MS-PA vs CIFR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while CIFR trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CIFR's competition here
MS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while CIFRW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CIFRW's competition here
MS-PA vs PWP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while PWP trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PWP's competition here
MS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SF-PD trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SF-PD's competition here
MS-PA vs TIGR Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while TIGR trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TIGR's competition here
MS-PA vs BGCP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BGCP's competition here
MS-PA vs HKIB Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HKIB's competition here
MS-PA vs DFIN Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while DFIN trades at $55.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check DFIN's competition here
MS-PA vs COWN Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check COWN's competition here
MS-PA vs BTBT Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BTBT trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTBT's competition here
MS-PA vs AC Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while AC trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AC's competition here
MS-PA vs OPY Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 752.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while OPY trades at $72.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check OPY's competition here
MS-PA vs BITF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 708.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BITF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BITF's competition here
MS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 686.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while FUFUW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFUW's competition here
MS-PA vs FUFU Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 644.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while FUFU trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 392.30. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check FUFU's competition here
MS-PA vs AMRK Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while AMRK trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check AMRK's competition here
MS-PA vs HIVE Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 482.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while HIVE trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -112.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HIVE's competition here
MS-PA vs GHL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GHL's competition here
MS-PA vs MFH Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MFH trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MFH's competition here
MS-PA vs SWIN Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SWIN trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SWIN's competition here
MS-PA vs BTCS Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 215.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BTCS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTCS's competition here
MS-PA vs WHG Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while WHG trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WHG's competition here
MS-PA vs SIEB Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SIEB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SIEB's competition here
MS-PA vs PROP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while PROP trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PROP's competition here
MS-PA vs GRYP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GRYP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRYP's competition here
MS-PA vs BTM Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while BTM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -205.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check BTM's competition here
MS-PA vs TCJH Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TCJH's competition here
MS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while CLSKW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check CLSKW's competition here
MS-PA vs SRL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SRL trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SRL's competition here
MS-PA vs GRDI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRDI's competition here
MS-PA vs HGBL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while HGBL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check HGBL's competition here
MS-PA vs PLUT Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while PLUT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check PLUT's competition here
MS-PA vs TOP Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while TOP trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check TOP's competition here
MS-PA vs SDIG Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SDIG's competition here
MS-PA vs MDBH Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MDBH trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MDBH's competition here
MS-PA vs COHN Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while COHN trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check COHN's competition here
MS-PA vs GREE Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GREE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GREE's competition here
MS-PA vs ARBK Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while ARBK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ARBK's competition here
MS-PA vs SAI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SAI's competition here
MS-PA vs MEGL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MEGL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MEGL's competition here
MS-PA vs NCPLW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NCPLW's competition here
MS-PA vs ABTS Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while ABTS trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ABTS's competition here
MS-PA vs NCPL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while NCPL trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check NCPL's competition here
MS-PA vs MIGI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while MIGI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check MIGI's competition here
MS-PA vs GSIW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GSIW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GSIW's competition here
MS-PA vs ATIF Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check ATIF's competition here
MS-PA vs WAI Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while WAI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check WAI's competition here
MS-PA vs GRDIW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check GRDIW's competition here
MS-PA vs SAITW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check SAITW's competition here
MS-PA vs LGHL Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 247K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while LGHL trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LGHL's competition here
MS-PA vs LGHLW Comparison August 2025
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 236.3B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 242.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.97, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.Check LGHLW's competition here