Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley MS-PA Peers
See (MS-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS-PA | $21.78 | -0.55% | 223.6B | 2.77 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PE | $25.45 | +0.00% | 225.7B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PF | $25.26 | +0.24% | 225.6B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PI | $25.04 | -0.20% | 225B | 3.19 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PK | $24.02 | -0.33% | 224.5B | 3.06 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS | $140.04 | -0.31% | 223.8B | 15.86 | $8.83 | +2.64% |
| GS-PD | $21.61 | -0.14% | 218B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.71% |
| GS-PC | $21.92 | +0.14% | 217.7B | 1.75 | $12.53 | +1.71% |
| GS-PA | $22.00 | -0.27% | 217.4B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.71% |
| GS | $700.41 | -0.79% | 214.9B | 16.26 | $43.08 | +1.71% |
Stock Comparison
MS-PA vs MS-PE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 225.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PE trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 225.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PF trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 225B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 224.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PK trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 223.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS trades at $140.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 218B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS-PD trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 217.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS-PC trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 217.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS-PA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 214.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS trades at $700.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 173.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SCHW trades at $95.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GS-PK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PQ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PQ trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PP trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while RJF trades at $160.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PL trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while TW trades at $135.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LPLA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while LPLA trades at $374.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MS-PO Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MS-PO trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs IBKR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while IBKR trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NMR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while NMR trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HLI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while HLI trades at $195.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs JEF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while JEF trades at $56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs EVR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while EVR trades at $296.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SF trades at $110.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SF-PB trades at $24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FRHC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while FRHC trades at $166.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 118.76. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs XP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while XP trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MKTX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MKTX trades at $210.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 36.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MARA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MARA trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -18.24. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs VIRT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while VIRT trades at $42.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PIPR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while PIPR trades at $317.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF-PA Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MC trades at $70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs RJF-PB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while RJF-PB trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LAZ Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while LAZ trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BGC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BGC trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SNEX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SNEX trades at $95.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PJT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while PJT trades at $184.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs IREN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while IREN trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -59.97. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUTU Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while FUTU trades at $164.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MRX Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MRX trades at $38.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CIFRW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while CIFRW trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HUT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while HUT trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -32.42. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SF-PC trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CIFR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while CIFR trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WULF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while WULF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TIGR Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while TIGR trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PWP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while PWP trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -96.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SF-PD Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SF-PD trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BGCP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs DFIN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while DFIN trades at $61.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HKIB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs COWN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTBT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 927.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BTBT trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs AC Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 791.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while AC trades at $37.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs OPY Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while OPY trades at $72.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUFUW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 734.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while FUFUW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BITF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 733.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BITF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs FUFU Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 683.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while FUFU trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 419.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs AMRK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 561.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while AMRK trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HIVE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 535.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while HIVE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs COHN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 332.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while COHN trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -10.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GHL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SWIN Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SWIN trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PROP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while PROP trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WHG Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while WHG trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 446.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SIEB Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 162.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SIEB trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTCS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BTCS trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MFH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MFH trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs BTM Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while BTM trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -36.87. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs CLSKW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRYP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GRYP trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TCJH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SRL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SRL trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs HGBL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while HGBL trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRDI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs PLUT Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while PLUT trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -63.40. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs TOP Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while TOP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MDBH Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MDBH trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SDIG Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GREE Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GREE trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ARBK Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while ARBK trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NCPLW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SAI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs NCPL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while NCPL trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ABTS Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while ABTS trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MIGI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MIGI trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs ATIF Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs MEGL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while MEGL trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GSIW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GSIW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs WAI Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while WAI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LGHLW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs GRDIW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs SAITW Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.
MS-PA vs LGHL Comparison
MS-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MS-PA stands at 223.6B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 357.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MS-PA is priced at $21.78, while LGHL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MS-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 2.77, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MS-PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MS-PA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MS-PA.