Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. MARA Peers
See (MARA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARA | $17.66 | -0.79% | 6.2B | -16.20 | -$1.09 | N/A |
| MS | $144.14 | +0.90% | 231.2B | 16.90 | $8.53 | +2.57% |
| GS | $723.68 | +1.09% | 222.1B | 16.80 | $43.08 | +1.66% |
| MS-PA | $21.61 | -0.37% | 219.8B | 2.75 | $7.86 | +2.57% |
| MS-PK | $24.08 | +0.04% | 218B | 3.06 | $7.86 | +2.57% |
| MS-PI | $25.14 | +0.00% | 217.4B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.57% |
| MS-PE | $25.43 | -0.08% | 216.4B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.57% |
| MS-PF | $25.14 | -0.29% | 215.3B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.57% |
| GS-PA | $21.52 | +0.09% | 207.4B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
| GS-PD | $21.15 | +0.00% | 206.4B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
MARA vs MS Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 231.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS trades at $144.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 222.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS trades at $723.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PA Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PA trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PK Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 218B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PK trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 217.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PI trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PE Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PE trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 215.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS-PA Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 207.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS-PA trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS-PD Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS-PD trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS-PC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS-PC trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SCHW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 166.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SCHW trades at $91.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS-PJ Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GS-PK Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PQ Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PQ trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PP trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs TW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while TW trades at $138.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 57.43. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PL trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs RJF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while RJF trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs LPLA Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while LPLA trades at $384.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MS-PO Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MS-PO trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs IBKR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while IBKR trades at $57.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs NMR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while NMR trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs HLI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while HLI trades at $185.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs JEF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while JEF trades at $56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SF trades at $109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs EVR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while EVR trades at $287.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SF-PB Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SF-PB trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs XP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while XP trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs FRHC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while FRHC trades at $143.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 102.38. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MKTX Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MKTX trades at $216.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.63. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs VIRT Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while VIRT trades at $44.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs RJF-PA Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BGC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BGC trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs PIPR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while PIPR trades at $293.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs RJF-PB Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MC trades at $65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs LAZ Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while LAZ trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SNEX Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SNEX trades at $93.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs PJT Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while PJT trades at $168.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs IREN Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while IREN trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -54.26. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs CIFRW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while CIFRW trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MRX Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MRX trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SF-PC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SF-PC trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs HUT Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while HUT trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -33.18. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs FUTU Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while FUTU trades at $121.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs CIFR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while CIFR trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs WULF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while WULF trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs PWP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while PWP trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -98.29. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SF-PD Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SF-PD trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs DFIN Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while DFIN trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BGCP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs TIGR Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while TIGR trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs HKIB Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs COWN Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs AC Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 789.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while AC trades at $37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs OPY Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 706.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while OPY trades at $67.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BTBT Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BTBT trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs FUFUW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 590.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while FUFUW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BITF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 567.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BITF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs AMRK Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while AMRK trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs FUFU Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while FUFU trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 344.00. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs HIVE Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 464.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while HIVE trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -115.50. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BTM Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 359.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BTM trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GHL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SIEB Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SIEB trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SWIN Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SWIN trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs PROP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while PROP trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs WHG Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while WHG trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 388.00. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs CLSKW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while CLSKW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GRYP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GRYP trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs TCJH Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SRL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SRL trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs HGBL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while HGBL trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GRDI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs BTCS Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while BTCS trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MDBH Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MDBH trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs TOP Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while TOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SDIG Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GSIW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GSIW trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs PLUT Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while PLUT trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs WAI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while WAI trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GREE Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GREE trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs COHN Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while COHN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SAI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs ARBK Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while ARBK trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs NCPL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while NCPL trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs ABTS Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while ABTS trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -13.19. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MIGI Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MIGI trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs NCPLW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs ATIF Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MEGL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MEGL trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs LGHLW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs GRDIW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs SAITW Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs MFH Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 760.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while MFH trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.
MARA vs LGHL Comparison
MARA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MARA stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 323.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MARA is priced at $17.66, while LGHL trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MARA currently has a P/E ratio of -16.20, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MARA's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MARA is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MARA.