LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. LPLA Peers
See (LPLA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPLA | $384.61 | +0.84% | 30.76B | 26.60 | $14.46 | +0.31% |
| MS-PA | $21.87 | +0.23% | 213.66B | 2.78 | $7.86 | +2.79% |
| MS-PI | $24.66 | +0.28% | 213.11B | 3.14 | $7.86 | +2.79% |
| MS-PF | $25.26 | +0.14% | 213.00B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.79% |
| MS-PK | $23.03 | +0.17% | 212.96B | 2.93 | $7.86 | +2.79% |
| MS-PE | $25.44 | +0.12% | 212.61B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.79% |
| MS | $132.20 | -0.23% | 212.09B | 15.50 | $8.53 | +2.79% |
| GS | $619.16 | +0.53% | 189.98B | 14.38 | $43.05 | +1.90% |
| GS-PC | $22.15 | -0.98% | 188.81B | 1.77 | $12.53 | +1.90% |
| GS-PA | $21.75 | -0.33% | 188.71B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
LPLA vs MS-PA Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 213.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PA trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 213.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PI trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 213.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PF trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PK Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 212.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PK trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PE Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 212.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PE trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 212.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS trades at $132.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 189.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS trades at $619.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS-PC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 188.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS-PC trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS-PA Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 188.71B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS-PA trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS-PD Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 187.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS-PD trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SCHW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 161.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SCHW trades at $88.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SCHW-PD Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 156.49B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs IBKR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 88.40B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while IBKR trades at $209.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS-PJ Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GS-PK Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PP trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PQ Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PQ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs TW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.32B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while TW trades at $145.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 59.74. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PL trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs RJF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 31.05B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while RJF trades at $153.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MS-PO Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MS-PO trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs NMR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 17.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while NMR trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs FUTU Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while FUTU trades at $107.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs HLI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.62B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while HLI trades at $180.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs JEF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while JEF trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs FRHC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while FRHC trades at $176.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SF-PB Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SF-PB trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.64. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SF trades at $98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs XP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.08B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while XP trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs EVR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while EVR trades at $241.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SCE-PJ Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MKTX Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MKTX trades at $216.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MARA Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MARA trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs RJF-PA Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs RJF-PB Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while RJF-PB trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs PIPR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while PIPR trades at $267.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MC trades at $61.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BGC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BGC trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs LAZ Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while LAZ trades at $46.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SNEX Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SNEX trades at $87.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs PJT Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while PJT trades at $150.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs VIRT Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while VIRT trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MRX Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MRX trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SF-PC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SF-PC trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs IREN Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while IREN trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -28.03. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SF-PD Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SF-PD trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs HUT Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while HUT trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BGCP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs PWP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while PWP trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -15.68. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs HKIB Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs DFIN Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while DFIN trades at $55.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs TIGR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while TIGR trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs WULF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while WULF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs CIFR Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while CIFR trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs COWN Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs AC Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 785.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while AC trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs OPY Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 666.00M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while OPY trades at $63.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs FUFU Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 606.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while FUFU trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BITF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 582.94M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BITF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs FUFUW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 575.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs AMRK Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 527.71M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while AMRK trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BTBT Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 484.93M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BTBT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MFH Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 339.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MFH trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -76.14. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs HIVE Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 327.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while HIVE trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -41.40. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GHL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs CIFRW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 218.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while CIFRW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BTM Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 168.47M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BTM trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs WHG Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 140.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while WHG trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 373.75. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SRL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 107.91M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SRL trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GRYP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 99.38M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GRYP trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SIEB Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SIEB trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs TCJH Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs HGBL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 78.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while HGBL trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs CLSKW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 70.66M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while CLSKW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GRDI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs BTCS Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 49.65M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while BTCS trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs TOP Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 49.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while TOP trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MDBH Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 42.54M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MDBH trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SDIG Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs PLUT Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 37.62M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while PLUT trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs ARBK Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 33.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while ARBK trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -46.62. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SWIN Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 30.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SWIN trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SAI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs COHN Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while COHN trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GSIW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 17.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GSIW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GREE Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 16.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GREE trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs WAI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while WAI trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MIGI Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MIGI trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs ABTS Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 8.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while ABTS trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs ATIF Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs MEGL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 5.73M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while MEGL trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs NCPLW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 5.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs NCPL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while NCPL trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs STSSW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while STSSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs LGHLW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 3.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while LGHLW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs GRDIW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs SAITW Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.
LPLA vs LGHL Comparison
LPLA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPLA stands at 30.76B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 37896.00. Regarding current trading prices, LPLA is priced at $384.61, while LGHL trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPLA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LPLA's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LPLA is more volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPLA.