Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LINC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC | $47.51 | -3.92% | 1.5B | 65.99 | $0.72 | N/A |
| EDU | $50.47 | -1.21% | 8B | 18.70 | $2.70 | +2.37% |
| TAL | $10.52 | -0.28% | 6.4B | 11.41 | $0.92 | N/A |
| GHC | $1,102.25 | -1.49% | 4.8B | 16.29 | $67.66 | +0.67% |
| LAUR | $32.90 | -0.33% | 4.6B | 17.59 | $1.87 | N/A |
| LOPE | $159.50 | -0.99% | 4.2B | 19.55 | $8.16 | N/A |
| ATGE | $106.64 | +1.49% | 3.9B | 15.71 | $6.79 | N/A |
| LRN | $90.19 | +0.41% | 3.8B | 14.10 | $6.39 | N/A |
| MH | $11.85 | -3.58% | 2.3B | -32.07 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| PRDO | $33.89 | -2.25% | 2.1B | 12.94 | $2.62 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
LINC vs EDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while EDU trades at $50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check EDU's competition here
LINC vs TAL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while TAL trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check TAL's competition here
LINC vs GHC Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GHC trades at $1,102.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GHC's competition here
LINC vs LAUR Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LAUR trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LAUR's competition here
LINC vs LOPE Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LOPE trades at $159.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LOPE's competition here
LINC vs ATGE Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ATGE trades at $106.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ATGE's competition here
LINC vs LRN Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LRN trades at $90.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LRN's competition here
LINC vs MH Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while MH trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas MH's P/E ratio is -32.07. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MH's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to MH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check MH's competition here
LINC vs PRDO Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while PRDO trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check PRDO's competition here
LINC vs UTI Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while UTI trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to UTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check UTI's competition here
LINC vs STRA Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while STRA trades at $80.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check STRA's competition here
LINC vs DAO Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while DAO trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 92.46. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to DAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check DAO's competition here
LINC vs AFYA Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while AFYA trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check AFYA's competition here
LINC vs PXED Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXED has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while PXED trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas PXED's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXED's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to PXED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check PXED's competition here
LINC vs APEI Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 982.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while APEI trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check APEI's competition here
LINC vs ARCE Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ARCE's competition here
LINC vs COUR Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 913.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while COUR trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to COUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check COUR's competition here
LINC vs QSG Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 822.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while QSG trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QSG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check QSG's competition here
LINC vs REDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check REDU's competition here
LINC vs GOTU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 701M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GOTU trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GOTU's competition here
LINC vs UDMY Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while UDMY trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -92.60. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check UDMY's competition here
LINC vs KLC Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while KLC trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to KLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check KLC's competition here
LINC vs VSTA Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 394M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while VSTA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSTA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check VSTA's competition here
LINC vs VTRU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check VTRU's competition here
LINC vs LGCY Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LGCY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LGCY's competition here
LINC vs SKIL-WT Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKIL-WT has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while SKIL-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas SKIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKIL-WT's ROE of -7.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to SKIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check SKIL-WT's competition here
LINC vs CHGG Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while CHGG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check CHGG's competition here
LINC vs BEDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while BEDU trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEDU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check BEDU's competition here
LINC vs YOUL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YOUL has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while YOUL trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas YOUL's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOUL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to YOUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check YOUL's competition here
LINC vs SKIL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while SKIL trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKIL's ROE of -7.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check SKIL's competition here
LINC vs ONE Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONE's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ONE's competition here
LINC vs LFS Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LFS has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LFS trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LFS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to LFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LFS's competition here
LINC vs STG Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while STG trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to STG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check STG's competition here
LINC vs AIU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check AIU's competition here
LINC vs RYET Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYET has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while RYET trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas RYET's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYET's ROE of -10.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to RYET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check RYET's competition here
LINC vs YQ Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while YQ trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to YQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check YQ's competition here
LINC vs GNS Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GNS trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to GNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GNS's competition here
LINC vs AACG Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while AACG trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check AACG's competition here
LINC vs GEHI Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GEHI's competition here
LINC vs JZ Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while JZ trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JZ's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to JZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check JZ's competition here
LINC vs IH Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while IH trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to IH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check IH's competition here
LINC vs EDTK Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while EDTK trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check EDTK's competition here
LINC vs TEDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check TEDU's competition here
LINC vs ASPU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASPU has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ASPU trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ASPU's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASPU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to ASPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ASPU's competition here
LINC vs BTCT Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTCT has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while BTCT trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas BTCT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to BTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check BTCT's competition here
LINC vs VEDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check VEDU's competition here
LINC vs WAFU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while WAFU trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check WAFU's competition here
LINC vs TCTM Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check TCTM's competition here
LINC vs TWOU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check TWOU's competition here
LINC vs CLEU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check CLEU's competition here
LINC vs METX Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check METX's competition here
LINC vs EEIQ Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while EEIQ trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check EEIQ's competition here
LINC vs FEDU Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while FEDU trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEDU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check FEDU's competition here
LINC vs MYND Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MYND has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while MYND trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas MYND's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYND's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to MYND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check MYND's competition here
LINC vs GV Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GV trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GV's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to GV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GV's competition here
LINC vs RYB Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check RYB's competition here
LINC vs GSUN Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 729.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GSUN trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GSUN's competition here
LINC vs AMBO Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 405.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while AMBO trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check AMBO's competition here
LINC vs KIDZW Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 195.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while KIDZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check KIDZW's competition here
LINC vs KIDZ Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 157.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while KIDZ trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check KIDZ's competition here
LINC vs LXEH Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 102.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while LXEH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check LXEH's competition here
LINC vs FCHL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FCHL has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while FCHL trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas FCHL's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FCHL's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to FCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check FCHL's competition here
LINC vs BTCTW Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check BTCTW's competition here
LINC vs HMHC Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check HMHC's competition here
LINC vs HLG Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check HLG's competition here
LINC vs FHS Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check FHS's competition here
LINC vs NEW Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check NEW's competition here
LINC vs ZME Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ZME's competition here
LINC vs RSHL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RSHL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while RSHL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas RSHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LINC has daily volatility of 5.36 and RSHL has daily volatility of N/A.Check RSHL's competition here
LINC vs TTEI Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TTEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while TTEI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas TTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTEI's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LINC has daily volatility of 5.36 and TTEI has daily volatility of N/A.Check TTEI's competition here
LINC vs ZVO Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check ZVO's competition here
LINC vs GPX Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check GPX's competition here
LINC vs APOL Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while APOL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas APOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APOL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is more volatile compared to APOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check APOL's competition here
LINC vs METXW Comparison May 2026
LINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINC stands at 1.5B. In comparison, METXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINC is priced at $47.51, while METXW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINC currently has a P/E ratio of 65.99, whereas METXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to METXW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINC is less volatile compared to METXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINC.Check METXW's competition here