Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while EFX trades at $180.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EFX's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while IT trades at $181.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check IT's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while BAH trades at $77.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check BAH's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while FCN trades at $151.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FCN's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while HURN trades at $151.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check HURN's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while ICFI trades at $88.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ICFI's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while CRAI trades at $168.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check CRAI's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 525.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while ROMA trades at $9.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -73.50. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ROMA's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while SBC trades at $3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBC's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while PPHC trades at $10.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check PPHC's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while FORR trades at $11.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FORR's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while RGP trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RGP's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 113.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while ZTG trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 98.20. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ZTG's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while EGG trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EGG's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while RYOJ trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 467.00. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RYOJ's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SDH's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, ACCL has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while ACCL trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas ACCL's P/E ratio is 40.57. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to ACCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ACCL's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while AERT trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AERT's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check AERT's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while SBCWW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBCWW's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, FOFO has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while FOFO trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas FOFO's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FOFO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to FOFO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FOFO's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while EPOW trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EPOW's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while GRNQ trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -28.52. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check GRNQ's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while VCIG trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VCIG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check VCIG's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is not fully comparable compared to FGO. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FGO's competition here

Franklin Covey Co. (NYSE: FC) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 228.6M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $20.25 on the NYSE, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FC currently has a P/E ratio of 28.11, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check NLSN's competition here