Franklin Covey Co. (FC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | $24.59 | +2.72% | 277.9M | -112.05 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| EFX | $166.06 | -1.37% | 20B | 29.28 | $5.67 | +1.28% |
| TRU | $67.85 | -2.96% | 13.1B | 18.79 | $3.61 | +0.70% |
| IT | $154.91 | -1.58% | 10.4B | 15.31 | $10.12 | N/A |
| BAH | $77.29 | -2.09% | 9.3B | 11.20 | $6.90 | +2.92% |
| FCN | $159.65 | -0.17% | 4.8B | 19.03 | $8.39 | N/A |
| EXPO | $55.37 | -3.25% | 2.7B | 25.87 | $2.14 | +2.18% |
| HURN | $109.44 | -1.00% | 1.8B | 18.71 | $5.85 | N/A |
| ICFI | $71.59 | +0.27% | 1.3B | 15.46 | $4.63 | +0.78% |
| CRAI | $149.08 | +0.43% | 962.7M | 20.66 | $7.21 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
FC vs EFX Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while EFX trades at $166.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EFX's competition here
FC vs TRU Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while TRU trades at $67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check TRU's competition here
FC vs IT Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while IT trades at $154.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check IT's competition here
FC vs BAH Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while BAH trades at $77.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check BAH's competition here
FC vs FCN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while FCN trades at $159.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FCN's competition here
FC vs EXPO Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while EXPO trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EXPO's competition here
FC vs HURN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while HURN trades at $109.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check HURN's competition here
FC vs ICFI Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while ICFI trades at $71.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ICFI's competition here
FC vs CRAI Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while CRAI trades at $149.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check CRAI's competition here
FC vs ROMA Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while ROMA trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -55.96. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ROMA's competition here
FC vs SBC Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 310.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while SBC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBC's competition here
FC vs EGG Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 188M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while EGG trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 336.00. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EGG's competition here
FC vs RGP Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while RGP trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RGP's competition here
FC vs FORR Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while FORR trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FORR's competition here
FC vs SDH Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SDH's competition here
FC vs RYOJ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while RYOJ trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 291.00. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RYOJ's competition here
FC vs AERT Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while AERT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AERT's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check AERT's competition here
FC vs SBCWW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while SBCWW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBCWW's competition here
FC vs EPOW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while EPOW trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EPOW's competition here
FC vs GRNQ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while GRNQ trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check GRNQ's competition here
FC vs AERTW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 974.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check AERTW's competition here
FC vs VCIG Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 619.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while VCIG trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check VCIG's competition here
FC vs INTJ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 143K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while INTJ trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check INTJ's competition here
FC vs FGO Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FC has daily volatility of 5.32 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
FC vs NLSN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 277.9M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $24.59, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -112.05, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check NLSN's competition here