Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See FCHL's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for FCHL and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCHL | $1.14 | -1.72% | 1.5M | -0.04 | -$27.65 | N/A |
| EDU | $49.24 | -0.22% | 7.8B | 13.62 | $3.62 | +2.44% |
| TAL | $10.30 | -0.39% | 6.3B | 10.20 | $1.01 | N/A |
| LAUR | $37.00 | +1.09% | 5.2B | 22.70 | $1.63 | N/A |
| GHC | $1,154.88 | +1.03% | 5B | 20.38 | $56.65 | +0.65% |
| CVSA | $115.84 | +0.62% | 3.9B | 14.82 | $7.82 | N/A |
| ATGE | $106.64 | +1.49% | 3.9B | 15.71 | $6.79 | N/A |
| LOPE | $139.94 | +0.52% | 3.7B | 14.92 | $9.38 | N/A |
| LRN | $86.88 | +0.94% | 3.7B | 10.56 | $8.23 | N/A |
| UTI | $37.78 | -2.30% | 2.1B | 49.03 | $0.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (NYSE: EDU)
FCHL vs EDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EDU has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while EDU trades at $49.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EDU's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to EDU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to EDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check EDU's competition here
TAL Education Group (NYSE: TAL)
FCHL vs TAL Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TAL has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while TAL trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TAL's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to TAL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to TAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check TAL's competition here
Laureate Education, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAUR)
FCHL vs LAUR Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LAUR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LAUR trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LAUR's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LAUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LAUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LAUR's competition here
Graham Holdings Company (NYSE: GHC)
FCHL vs GHC Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GHC trades at $1,154.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GHC's competition here
Covista Inc. (NYSE: CVSA)
FCHL vs CVSA Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CVSA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while CVSA trades at $115.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CVSA's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to CVSA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to CVSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check CVSA's competition here
Adtalem Global Education Inc. (NYSE: ATGE)
FCHL vs ATGE Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ATGE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ATGE trades at $106.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ATGE's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ATGE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to ATGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ATGE's competition here
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (NASDAQ: LOPE)
FCHL vs LOPE Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LOPE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LOPE trades at $139.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOPE's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LOPE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LOPE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LOPE's competition here
Stride, Inc. (NYSE: LRN)
FCHL vs LRN Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LRN trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LRN's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LRN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LRN's competition here
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (NYSE: UTI)
FCHL vs UTI Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UTI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while UTI trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UTI's P/E ratio is 49.03. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to UTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to UTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check UTI's competition here
Perdoceo Education Corporation (NASDAQ: PRDO)
FCHL vs PRDO Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PRDO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while PRDO trades at $30.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PRDO's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to PRDO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to PRDO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check PRDO's competition here
McGraw Hill, Inc. (NYSE: MH)
FCHL vs MH Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while MH trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MH's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to MH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to MH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check MH's competition here
Youdao, Inc. (NYSE: DAO)
FCHL vs DAO Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DAO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while DAO trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DAO's P/E ratio is 109.82. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to DAO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to DAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check DAO's competition here
Strategic Education, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRA)
FCHL vs STRA Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, STRA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while STRA trades at $75.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STRA's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to STRA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to STRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check STRA's competition here
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ: LINC)
FCHL vs LINC Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LINC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LINC trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LINC's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LINC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LINC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LINC's competition here
Afya Limited (NASDAQ: AFYA)
FCHL vs AFYA Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AFYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while AFYA trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AFYA's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to AFYA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to AFYA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check AFYA's competition here
Phoenix Education Partners, Inc (NYSE: PXED)
FCHL vs PXED Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PXED has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while PXED trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PXED's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to PXED's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to PXED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check PXED's competition here
Arco Platform Limited (NASDAQ: ARCE)
FCHL vs ARCE Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ARCE has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ARCE trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARCE's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ARCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to ARCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ARCE's competition here
Coursera, Inc. (NYSE: COUR)
FCHL vs COUR Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, COUR has a market cap of 908.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while COUR trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas COUR's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to COUR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to COUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check COUR's competition here
American Public Education, Inc. (NASDAQ: APEI)
FCHL vs APEI Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, APEI has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while APEI trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas APEI's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to APEI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to APEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check APEI's competition here
QuantaSing Group Ltd (NASDAQ: QSG)
FCHL vs QSG Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, QSG has a market cap of 822.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while QSG trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas QSG's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to QSG's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to QSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check QSG's competition here
RISE Education Cayman Ltd (NASDAQ: REDU)
FCHL vs REDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, REDU has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while REDU trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REDU's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to REDU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to REDU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check REDU's competition here
Udemy, Inc. (NASDAQ: UDMY)
FCHL vs UDMY Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UDMY has a market cap of 677.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while UDMY trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UDMY's P/E ratio is -92.60. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to UDMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to UDMY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check UDMY's competition here
KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. (NYSE: KLC)
FCHL vs KLC Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KLC has a market cap of 584.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while KLC trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KLC's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to KLC's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to KLC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check KLC's competition here
Gaotu Techedu Inc. (NYSE: GOTU)
FCHL vs GOTU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GOTU has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GOTU trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GOTU's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GOTU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to GOTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GOTU's competition here
Vasta Platform Limited (NASDAQ: VSTA)
FCHL vs VSTA Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VSTA has a market cap of 394M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while VSTA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VSTA's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to VSTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to VSTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check VSTA's competition here
Vitru Limited (NASDAQ: VTRU)
FCHL vs VTRU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VTRU has a market cap of 304.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while VTRU trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VTRU's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to VTRU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to VTRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check VTRU's competition here
Legacy Education Inc. (AMEX: LGCY)
FCHL vs LGCY Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LGCY has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LGCY trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LGCY's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LGCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LGCY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LGCY's competition here
Skillsoft Corp. (NYSE: SKIL-WT)
FCHL vs SKIL-WT Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SKIL-WT has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while SKIL-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SKIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to SKIL-WT's ROE of +10.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to SKIL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check SKIL-WT's competition here
Chegg, Inc. (NYSE: CHGG)
FCHL vs CHGG Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CHGG has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while CHGG trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CHGG's P/E ratio is -24.15. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to CHGG's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to CHGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check CHGG's competition here
51Talk Online Education Group (AMEX: COE)
FCHL vs COE Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, COE has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while COE trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas COE's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to COE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to COE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check COE's competition here
Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (NYSE: BEDU)
FCHL vs BEDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BEDU has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while BEDU trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BEDU's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to BEDU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to BEDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check BEDU's competition here
Skillsoft Corp. (NYSE: SKIL)
FCHL vs SKIL Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SKIL has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while SKIL trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SKIL's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to SKIL's ROE of +10.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to SKIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check SKIL's competition here
LEIFRAS Co., Ltd. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: LFS)
FCHL vs LFS Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LFS has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LFS trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LFS's P/E ratio is 71.67. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LFS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to LFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LFS's competition here
Meta Data Limited (NYSE: ONE)
FCHL vs ONE Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ONE has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ONE trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ONE's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to ONE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ONE's competition here
Sunlands Technology Group (NYSE: STG)
FCHL vs STG Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, STG has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while STG trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STG's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to STG's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to STG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check STG's competition here
Youlife Group Inc. (NASDAQ: YOUL)
FCHL vs YOUL Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YOUL has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while YOUL trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas YOUL's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to YOUL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to YOUL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check YOUL's competition here
Meta Data Limited (NYSE: AIU)
FCHL vs AIU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AIU has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while AIU trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AIU's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to AIU's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to AIU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check AIU's competition here
17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (NASDAQ: YQ)
FCHL vs YQ Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YQ has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while YQ trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas YQ's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to YQ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to YQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check YQ's competition here
Gravitas Education Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: GEHI)
FCHL vs GEHI Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GEHI has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GEHI trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GEHI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GEHI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to GEHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GEHI's competition here
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (NASDAQ: EDTK)
FCHL vs EDTK Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EDTK has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while EDTK trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EDTK's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to EDTK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to EDTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check EDTK's competition here
iHuman Inc. (NYSE: IH)
FCHL vs IH Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, IH has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while IH trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IH's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to IH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to IH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check IH's competition here
ATA Creativity Global (NASDAQ: AACG)
FCHL vs AACG Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AACG has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while AACG trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AACG's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to AACG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to AACG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check AACG's competition here
Genius Group Limited (AMEX: GNS)
FCHL vs GNS Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GNS has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GNS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GNS's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GNS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to GNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GNS's competition here
TCTM Kids IT Education Inc. (NASDAQ: TEDU)
FCHL vs TEDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TEDU has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while TEDU trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TEDU's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to TEDU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to TEDU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check TEDU's competition here
Visionary Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: VEDU)
FCHL vs VEDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VEDU has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while VEDU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEDU's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to VEDU's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to VEDU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check VEDU's competition here
Wah Fu Education Group Limited (NASDAQ: WAFU)
FCHL vs WAFU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, WAFU has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while WAFU trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WAFU's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to WAFU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to WAFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check WAFU's competition here
TCTM Kids IT Education Inc. (NASDAQ: TCTM)
FCHL vs TCTM Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TCTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while TCTM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TCTM's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to TCTM's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to TCTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check TCTM's competition here
2U, Inc. (NASDAQ: TWOU)
FCHL vs TWOU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TWOU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while TWOU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TWOU's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to TWOU's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to TWOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check TWOU's competition here
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Company Limited (NASDAQ: JZ)
FCHL vs JZ Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, JZ has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while JZ trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JZ's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to JZ's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to JZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check JZ's competition here
China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: CLEU)
FCHL vs CLEU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CLEU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while CLEU trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CLEU's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to CLEU's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to CLEU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check CLEU's competition here
Meten Holding Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: METX)
FCHL vs METX Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, METX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while METX trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas METX's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to METX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to METX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check METX's competition here
Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE: FEDU)
FCHL vs FEDU Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FEDU has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while FEDU trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FEDU's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to FEDU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to FEDU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check FEDU's competition here
Elite Education Group International Limited (NASDAQ: EEIQ)
FCHL vs EEIQ Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EEIQ has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while EEIQ trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EEIQ's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to EEIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to EEIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check EEIQ's competition here
RYB Education, Inc. (NYSE: RYB)
FCHL vs RYB Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, RYB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while RYB trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RYB's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to RYB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to RYB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check RYB's competition here
Visionary Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: GV)
FCHL vs GV Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GV has a market cap of 723.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GV trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GV's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GV's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to GV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GV's competition here
KIDZ AI Inc. (NASDAQ: KIDZ)
FCHL vs KIDZ Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KIDZ has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while KIDZ trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KIDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to KIDZ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to KIDZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check KIDZ's competition here
Golden Sun Education Group Limited (NASDAQ: GSUN)
FCHL vs GSUN Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GSUN has a market cap of 376.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GSUN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GSUN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GSUN's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to GSUN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GSUN's competition here
Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMEX: AMBO)
FCHL vs AMBO Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AMBO has a market cap of 317K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while AMBO trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AMBO's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to AMBO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to AMBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check AMBO's competition here
Lixiang Education Holding Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: LXEH)
FCHL vs LXEH Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LXEH has a market cap of 103.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while LXEH trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LXEH's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to LXEH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to LXEH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check LXEH's competition here
KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04.03.30 on KIDZ AI (NASDAQ: KIDZW)
FCHL vs KIDZW Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KIDZW has a market cap of 19.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while KIDZW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KIDZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to KIDZW's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to KIDZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check KIDZW's competition here
BTC Digital Ltd. (NASDAQ: BTCTW)
FCHL vs BTCTW Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BTCTW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while BTCTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BTCTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to BTCTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to BTCTW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check BTCTW's competition here
Zovio Inc (NASDAQ: ZVO)
FCHL vs ZVO Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ZVO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ZVO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZVO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ZVO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to ZVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ZVO's competition here
Zhangmen Education Inc. (NYSE: ZME)
FCHL vs ZME Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ZME has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ZME trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZME's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ZME's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to ZME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ZME's competition here
Meten EdtechX Education Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: METXW)
FCHL vs METXW Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, METXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while METXW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas METXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to METXW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to METXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check METXW's competition here
Hailiang Education Group Inc. (NASDAQ: HLG)
FCHL vs HLG Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while HLG trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLG's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to HLG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to HLG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check HLG's competition here
GP Strategies Corporation (NYSE: GPX)
FCHL vs GPX Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GPX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while GPX trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to GPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to GPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check GPX's competition here
Puxin Limited (NYSE: NEW)
FCHL vs NEW Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while NEW trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NEW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to NEW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to NEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check NEW's competition here
Capella Education Company (NASDAQ: CPLA)
FCHL vs CPLA Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CPLA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while CPLA trades at $104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CPLA's P/E ratio is 46.14. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to CPLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to CPLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check CPLA's competition here
Cambium Learning Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ABCD)
FCHL vs ABCD Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ABCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while ABCD trades at $14.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ABCD's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to ABCD's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to ABCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check ABCD's competition here
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company (NASDAQ: HMHC)
FCHL vs HMHC Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HMHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while HMHC trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HMHC's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to HMHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to HMHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check HMHC's competition here
Apollo Education Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: APOL)
FCHL vs APOL Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, APOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while APOL trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas APOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to APOL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is more volatile compared to APOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check APOL's competition here
TDE Group Ltd (NASDAQ: TTEI)
FCHL vs TTEI Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TTEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while TTEI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to TTEI's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is not fully comparable compared to TTEI. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check TTEI's competition here
First High-School Education Group Co., Ltd. (NYSE: FHS)
FCHL vs FHS Comparison July 2026
Fitness Champs Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: FCHL) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCHL stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FHS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCHL is priced at $1.14 on the NASDAQ, while FHS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCHL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHS's P/E ratio is 0.55. In terms of profitability, FCHL's ROE is -3.43%, compared to FHS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCHL is less volatile compared to FHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCHL.Check FHS's competition here