Lion Financial Group Limited
Lion Financial Group Limited LGHLW Peers
See (LGHLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGHLW | $0.00 | -42.31% | 2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MS | $142.28 | -0.57% | 228.2B | 16.68 | $8.53 | +2.60% |
| MS-PA | $21.84 | -0.86% | 222.8B | 2.79 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PK | $24.10 | -0.41% | 218.5B | 3.07 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PI | $25.16 | +0.00% | 217.6B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PF | $25.30 | -0.16% | 216.9B | 3.22 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PE | $25.44 | -0.11% | 216.5B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| GS | $704.95 | -0.59% | 216.2B | 16.35 | $43.09 | +2.09% |
| GS-PD | $21.58 | -0.46% | 210.7B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.09% |
| GS-PA | $21.85 | -0.59% | 210.3B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +2.09% |
Stock Comparison
LGHLW vs MS Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 228.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS trades at $142.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PA Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PA trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PK Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 218.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PK trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PI trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PE Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PE trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 216.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS trades at $704.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS-PD Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS-PD trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS-PA Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 210.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS-PA trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS-PC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 208.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS-PC trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SCHW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SCHW trades at $91.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SCHW-PD Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS-PJ Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GS-PK Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PQ Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PQ trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PP trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PL trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs TW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while TW trades at $136.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs RJF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while RJF trades at $158.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs LPLA Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while LPLA trades at $371.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MS-PO Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MS-PO trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs IBKR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while IBKR trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs NMR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while NMR trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs HLI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while HLI trades at $189.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs EVR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while EVR trades at $291.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs JEF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while JEF trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SF trades at $108.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SF-PB Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SF-PB trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs XP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while XP trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs FRHC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while FRHC trades at $145.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 103.91. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SCE-PJ Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MKTX Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MKTX trades at $216.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MARA Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MARA trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs VIRT Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while VIRT trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs PIPR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while PIPR trades at $302.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs RJF-PA Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MC trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs RJF-PB Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while RJF-PB trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BGC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BGC trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 39.73. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs LAZ Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while LAZ trades at $51.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SNEX Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SNEX trades at $91.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs PJT Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while PJT trades at $175.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs IREN Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while IREN trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -52.40. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MRX Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MRX trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs FUTU Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while FUTU trades at $149.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs HUT Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while HUT trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -33.05. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SF-PC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SF-PC trades at $23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs CIFRW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while CIFRW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs CIFR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while CIFR trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs WULF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while WULF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SF-PD Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SF-PD trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs DFIN Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while DFIN trades at $64.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs PWP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while PWP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -95.24. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BGCP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs TIGR Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while TIGR trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs HKIB Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs COWN Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs AC Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 791.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while AC trades at $37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BTBT Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 695.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BTBT trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs OPY Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 689.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while OPY trades at $66.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs FUFUW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 615.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while FUFUW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs FUFU Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while FUFU trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 371.00. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs AMRK Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while AMRK trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BITF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 592.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BITF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs HIVE Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while HIVE trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BTM Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 355.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BTM trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -36.83. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GHL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MFH Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MFH trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -55.25. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs COHN Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 277.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while COHN trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SWIN Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SWIN trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs WHG Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while WHG trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 419.00. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs PROP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while PROP trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SIEB Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SIEB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs CLSKW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while CLSKW trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GRYP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GRYP trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs BTCS Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while BTCS trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs TCJH Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SRL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SRL trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs HGBL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while HGBL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GRDI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs PLUT Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while PLUT trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -63.40. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs TOP Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while TOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MDBH Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MDBH trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SDIG Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GSIW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GSIW trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs NCPLW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GREE Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GREE trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs ARBK Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while ARBK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SAI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs NCPL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while NCPL trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs ABTS Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while ABTS trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MIGI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MIGI trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs ATIF Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs MEGL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while MEGL trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs WAI Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while WAI trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs GRDIW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs SAITW Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.
LGHLW vs LGHL Comparison
LGHLW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGHLW stands at 2M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 394.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGHLW is priced at $0.00, while LGHL trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGHLW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LGHLW's ROE is -1.53%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LGHLW is more volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGHLW.