AMTD International Inc.
AMTD International Inc. HKIB Peers
See (HKIB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKIB | $3.90 | -1.52% | 1.5B | 6.68 | $0.58 | N/A |
| MS | $129.22 | +2.50% | 207.3B | 15.15 | $8.53 | +2.93% |
| MS-PK | $22.91 | +0.84% | 203.9B | 2.92 | $7.86 | +2.93% |
| MS-PA | $21.62 | +0.56% | 203.4B | 2.75 | $7.86 | +2.93% |
| MS-PI | $24.69 | +0.53% | 203.3B | 3.14 | $7.86 | +2.93% |
| MS-PF | $25.23 | +0.12% | 202.5B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.93% |
| MS-PE | $25.36 | +0.08% | 202.4B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +2.93% |
| GS | $615.92 | +2.90% | 189B | 14.29 | $43.09 | +1.96% |
| GS-PA | $21.49 | +0.99% | 185.5B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.96% |
| GS-PD | $21.43 | +0.88% | 185.3B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.96% |
Stock Comparison
HKIB vs MS Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS trades at $129.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PK Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 203.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PK trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PA Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 203.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PA trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PI trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 202.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PF trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PE Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 202.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PE trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 189B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS trades at $615.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS-PA Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 185.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS-PA trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS-PD Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 185.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS-PD trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS-PC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS-PC trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SCHW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 161B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SCHW trades at $88.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SCHW-PD Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs IBKR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while IBKR trades at $212.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS-PJ Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GS-PK Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PQ Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PQ trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PP trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs TW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while TW trades at $146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.08. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs LPLA Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while LPLA trades at $382.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs RJF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while RJF trades at $148.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MS-PO Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MS-PO trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs NMR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while NMR trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs FUTU Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while FUTU trades at $106.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs HLI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while HLI trades at $176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs JEF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while JEF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs XP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while XP trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SF trades at $95.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SF-PB Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SF-PB trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs FRHC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while FRHC trades at $156.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs EVR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while EVR trades at $234.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SCE-PJ Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MKTX Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MKTX trades at $217.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MARA Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MARA trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -15.08. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs RJF-PA Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs RJF-PB Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while RJF-PB trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BGC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BGC trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs PIPR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while PIPR trades at $256.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MC trades at $58.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SNEX Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SNEX trades at $87.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs LAZ Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while LAZ trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs PJT Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while PJT trades at $151.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs VIRT Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while VIRT trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MRX Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MRX trades at $46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SF-PC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SF-PC trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs IREN Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while IREN trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SF-PD Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SF-PD trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs HUT Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while HUT trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -25.61. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BGCP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs PWP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while PWP trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -85.67. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs DFIN Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while DFIN trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs WULF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while WULF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs TIGR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while TIGR trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs CIFR Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while CIFR trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs COWN Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs AC Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while AC trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs OPY Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 680.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while OPY trades at $65.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs FUFU Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while FUFU trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BITF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 594.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BITF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs FUFUW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 594.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while FUFUW trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BTBT Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BTBT trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.61. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs AMRK Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 518.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while AMRK trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs HIVE Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while HIVE trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -39.60. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GHL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BTM Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BTM trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -24.60. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MFH Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MFH trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -41.50. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs CIFRW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while CIFRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SIEB Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SIEB trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs CLSKW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while CLSKW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs WHG Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while WHG trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 372.50. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SRL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SRL trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs TCJH Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GRYP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GRYP trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs HGBL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while HGBL trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs BTCS Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while BTCS trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GRDI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs TOP Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while TOP trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SDIG Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MDBH Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MDBH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs PLUT Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while PLUT trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -45.40. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs ARBK Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while ARBK trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GREE Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GREE trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SWIN Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SWIN trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SAI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GSIW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GSIW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs COHN Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while COHN trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs WAI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while WAI trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MIGI Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MIGI trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs ABTS Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while ABTS trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -11.45. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs ATIF Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs MEGL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while MEGL trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs NCPL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while NCPL trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs NCPLW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs LGHLW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while LGHLW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs GRDIW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs SAITW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs STSSW Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 13.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while STSSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is more volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.
HKIB vs LGHL Comparison
HKIB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HKIB stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 883. Regarding current trading prices, HKIB is priced at $3.90, while LGHL trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HKIB currently has a P/E ratio of 6.68, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HKIB's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HKIB is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HKIB.