The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 195.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS trades at $121.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PE trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 191.54B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PI trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 191.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PF trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 191.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PK trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 190.20B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PA trades at $21.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 174.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GS-PA trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 173.66B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GS-PD trades at $21.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 172.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GS-PC trades at $22.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 157.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 153.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SCHW trades at $84.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 78.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IBKR trades at $185.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 50.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MQBKY trades at $132.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CIIHY trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 48.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 44.78B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MCQEF trades at $123.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PQ trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PP trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 37.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.87B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TW trades at $147.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.43B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PL trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RJF trades at $145.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.82B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LPLA trades at $360.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.63B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NMR trades at $5.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HUATF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CMSQY trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FUTU trades at $102.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 12.70B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CMSQF trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HLI trades at $173.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CNICF trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 10.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HAITY trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JEF trades at $50.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while XP trades at $17.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SF-PB trades at $23.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 9.46B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FRHC trades at $156.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SF trades at $91.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DSECF trades at $6.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DSEEY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MKTX trades at $231.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while EVR trades at $216.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BRPHF trades at $19.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MARA trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RJF-PB trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BGC trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PIPR trades at $251.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SNEX trades at $88.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CLPE trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MC trades at $54.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LAZ trades at $42.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while VIRT trades at $43.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PJT trades at $144.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MRX trades at $47.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LTSAP trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CLSKW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SF-PC trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LTSA trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SF-PD trades at $18.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BGCP trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGCP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TIGR trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IREN trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PWP trades at $17.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -84.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HKIB trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DFIN trades at $53.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HUT trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DEFTF trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WULF trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CIFR trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while COWN trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 775.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while AC trades at $36.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LKADF trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 666.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CBGPY trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 654.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CCORF trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 636.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while OPY trades at $61.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 592.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FUFU trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 583.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PHIG trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 582.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 547.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BITF trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 525.22M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CBGPF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 520.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 496.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while AMRK trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 423.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BTBT trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 392.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CYFRF trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 85.33. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 387.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MFH trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -86.86. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CESTY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 290.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HIVE trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CESTF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GHL trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GHL's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while APPCF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 199.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PROP trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 190.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ABIT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while OZFRY trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.41M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 143.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WHG trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 133.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PNPFF trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 133.64M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CIFRW trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while STGC trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SRL trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 108.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BTM trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTM's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 95.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SIEB trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CURN has a market cap of 91.31M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CURN trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CURN's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TCJH trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 81.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GEVI trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 79.62M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while XAUMF trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DYNA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 72.68M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HGBL trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GRDI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 67.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HAFG trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BTCS trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 46.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 44.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TOP trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 43.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MDBH trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SDIG trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 36.06M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GRYP trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 34.39M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DMGGF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PLUT trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -47.40. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLUT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 28.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SWIN trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CRMZ trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 25.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CBTTF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 25.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BBKCF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while EBML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 23.23M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ARBK trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SMURF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ABTS trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SAI trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while COHN trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 15.91M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WAI trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BULT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FWAV trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 14.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GREE trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FFTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 12.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BCNWF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 11.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FDCT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FDCT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 11.56M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MIGI trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MIGI's ROE of -14.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 10.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GSIW trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 10.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MATEF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.63M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ATIF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ITEX trades at $4.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.87M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MEGL trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BTCWF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 6.40M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 5.88M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IHLDF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 5.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HYHDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 5.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while AAMTF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 4.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PHIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 4.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NCPL trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BZRD trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 3.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BIDCF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CRKR trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 2.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DBKSF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PIHG has a market cap of 2.43M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PIHG trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PIHG's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIHG's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to PIHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while IFXY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NSAV has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NSAV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NSAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSAV's ROE of +2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NSAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TRAA trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FNDM has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FNDM trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FNDM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FNDM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to FNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CBTC has a market cap of 1.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CBTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBTC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TRAC has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TRAC trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TRAC's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to TRAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HAON has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HAON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HAON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAON's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, EQOSQ has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while EQOSQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EQOSQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQOSQ's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to EQOSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GRNBF has a market cap of 1.35M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GRNBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GRNBF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRNBF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to GRNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, GMPW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while GMPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas GMPW's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GMPW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to GMPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BKLLF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BKLLF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BKLLF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKLLF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BKLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MGTI has a market cap of 996268.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MGTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MGTI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGTI's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MXLGF has a market cap of 964416.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MXLGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MXLGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MXLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964198.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SAITW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MNTR has a market cap of 954188.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MNTR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MNTR's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNTR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MNTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BEGI has a market cap of 927445.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BEGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEGI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BEGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BLQC has a market cap of 927153.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BLQC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BLQC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLQC's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BLQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ICOA has a market cap of 848342.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ICOA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ICOA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ICOA's ROE of +64.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to ICOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MGHL has a market cap of 726109.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MGHL trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MGHL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MGHL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to MGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CSOL has a market cap of 702311.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CSOL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CSOL's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSOL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CSOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 643962.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HIPH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 480031.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CCTL has a market cap of 373483.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CCTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCTL's ROE of -7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to CCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JTBK has a market cap of 369253.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JTBK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JTBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JTBK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to JTBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BYSD has a market cap of 367954.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BYSD trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BYSD's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BYSD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BYSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RDWD has a market cap of 340331.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RDWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RDWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDWD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to RDWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, KGRI has a market cap of 317935.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while KGRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas KGRI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to KGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LNTO has a market cap of 317503.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LNTO trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LNTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNTO's ROE of +18.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LNTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BFCH has a market cap of 241318.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BFCH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BFCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BFCH's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BFCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CBYI has a market cap of 238986.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CBYI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CBYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBYI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CBYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SOHL has a market cap of 228215.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SOHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SOHL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SOHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JMON has a market cap of 175903.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JMON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JMON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to JMON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HYBOF has a market cap of 122760.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HYBOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HYBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HYBOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HYBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BITCF has a market cap of 121405.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BITCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BITCF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BITCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BITCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LFAP has a market cap of 117989.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LFAP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LFAP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RGST has a market cap of 85571.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RGST trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RGST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to RGST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, VNTN has a market cap of 84884.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while VNTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas VNTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VNTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to VNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, TWCI has a market cap of 57476.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while TWCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas TWCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TWCI's ROE of +9.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to TWCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, CNXS has a market cap of 52661.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while CNXS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas CNXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to CNXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NODC has a market cap of 42613.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NODC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NODC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NODC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 40669.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LGHL trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, UMFG has a market cap of 36754.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while UMFG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas UMFG's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to UMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, VTXB has a market cap of 32175.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while VTXB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas VTXB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VTXB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to VTXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BTGN has a market cap of 25361.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BTGN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BTGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTGN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BTGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, AXTG has a market cap of 24479.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while AXTG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas AXTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to AXTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BGMO has a market cap of 22777.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BGMO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BGMO's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BGMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to BGMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RAFFF has a market cap of 11417.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RAFFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RAFFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to RAFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, UCSO has a market cap of 8373.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while UCSO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas UCSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UCSO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to UCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WDBG has a market cap of 8325.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WDBG trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WDBG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WDBG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WDBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, RMTN has a market cap of 6049.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while RMTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas RMTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMTN's ROE of +4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to RMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NTFL has a market cap of 6034.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NTFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NTFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTFL's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to NTFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, OFSI has a market cap of 5112.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while OFSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas OFSI's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OFSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to OFSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, ATCC has a market cap of 2677.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while ATCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas ATCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to ATCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BLPFF has a market cap of 1194.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BLPFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BLPFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLPFF's ROE of -17.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, STSSW has a market cap of 817.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while STSSW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas STSSW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STSSW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to STSSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, EZTD has a market cap of 520.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while EZTD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EZTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EZTD's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to EZTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, MERR has a market cap of 456.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while MERR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas MERR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MERR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to MERR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, WSFL has a market cap of 274.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while WSFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas WSFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSFL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to WSFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, SYSX has a market cap of 248.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while SYSX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas SYSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SYSX's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to SYSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JRJCY has a market cap of 244.00. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JRJCY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JRJCY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRJCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to JRJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LEHNQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LEHNQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LEHNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEHNQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to LEHNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LEHLQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LEHLQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LEHLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LEHLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to LEHLQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JMP trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to JMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DSRO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DSRO trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DSRO's P/E ratio is -99.60. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSRO's ROE of +30.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to DSRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, LHHMQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while LHHMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas LHHMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LHHMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to LHHMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, EQOS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while EQOS trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas EQOS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EQOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to EQOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, FLTDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while FLTDF trades at $23.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas FLTDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLTDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to FLTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PWPPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PWPPW trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PWPPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PWPPW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to PWPPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, PIEJF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while PIEJF trades at $39.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas PIEJF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIEJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to PIEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, HVBT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while HVBT trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas HVBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HVBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to HVBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, DPW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while DPW trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas DPW's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DPW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to DPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, BETS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while BETS trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas BETS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BETS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to BETS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, NILE-PD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while NILE-PD trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas NILE-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NILE-PD's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to NILE-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, XPVVV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while XPVVV trades at $44.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas XPVVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPVVV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is more volatile compared to XPVVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.

GS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GS stands at 173.89B. In comparison, JRJC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GS is priced at $566.70, while JRJC trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.15, whereas JRJC's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, GS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JRJC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GS is less volatile compared to JRJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GS.