Futu Holdings Limited

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 240.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PA trades at $22.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PA's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 239.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PK trades at $24.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.12. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PK's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PI trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PF trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PE trades at $25.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PE's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 236.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS trades at $148.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 229.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS-PA trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS-PA's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS-PC trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS-PC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 227.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS-PD trades at $21.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS-PD's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 224.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS trades at $741.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SCHW trades at $95.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SCHW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 173.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SCHW-PD's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS-PJ's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GS-PK's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PQ trades at $26.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PQ's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PP trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PL trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while RJF trades at $165.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check RJF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while LPLA trades at $362.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check LPLA's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MS-PO trades at $17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MS-PO's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while TW trades at $127.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 49.28. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check TW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while IBKR trades at $62.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check IBKR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while NMR trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check NMR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while HLI trades at $197.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check HLI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while JEF trades at $62.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check JEF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while EVR trades at $319.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check EVR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SF-PB trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SF-PB's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SF trades at $114.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while FRHC trades at $174.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 130.86. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check FRHC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SCE-PJ trades at $24.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SCE-PJ's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while XP trades at $16.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check XP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MKTX trades at $188.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MKTX's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while VIRT trades at $42.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check VIRT's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MARA trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MARA's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while PIPR trades at $336.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check PIPR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MC trades at $72.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check RJF-PA's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while LAZ trades at $55.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check LAZ's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while IREN trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -69.13. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check IREN's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SNEX trades at $98.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SNEX's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while RJF-PB trades at $25.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check RJF-PB's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BGC trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BGC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while PJT trades at $180.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check PJT's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while WULF trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -26.17. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check WULF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while CIFRW trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check CIFRW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MRX trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MRX's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SF-PC trades at $24.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SF-PC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while CIFR trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check CIFR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while HUT trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check HUT's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while TIGR trades at $12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check TIGR's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while PWP trades at $22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check PWP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SF-PD trades at $18.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SF-PD's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BGCP trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BGCP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while DFIN trades at $56.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check DFIN's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while HKIB trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check HKIB's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while COWN trades at $38.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check COWN's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 925.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BTBT trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BTBT's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 749.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while OPY trades at $72.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check OPY's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 708.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while AC trades at $33.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check AC's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 708.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BITF trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BITF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 619.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while FUFU trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check FUFU's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 614.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while FUFUW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check FUFUW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 593M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while AMRK trades at $24.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check AMRK's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while HIVE trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check HIVE's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 314.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MFH trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -61.75. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MFH's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GHL trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GHL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BTCS trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BTCS's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 212.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SWIN trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SWIN's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 177.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while WHG trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check WHG's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while PROP trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check PROP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SIEB trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SIEB's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GRYP trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GRYP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while BTM trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -190.50. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check BTM's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while CLSKW trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check CLSKW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while TCJH trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check TCJH's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SRL trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SRL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while HGBL trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check HGBL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GRDI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GRDI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while TOP trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check TOP's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while PLUT trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -56.70. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check PLUT's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SDIG trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SDIG's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MDBH trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MDBH's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while COHN trades at $12.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COHN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check COHN's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GREE trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GREE's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SAI trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SAI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while ARBK trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check ARBK's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MEGL trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MEGL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while NCPL trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check NCPL's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while ABTS trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check ABTS's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while MIGI trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check MIGI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while NCPLW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check NCPLW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while ATIF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check ATIF's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GSIW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GSIW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while WAI trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check WAI's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check GRDIW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while SAITW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check SAITW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 268.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check LGHLW's competition here

FUTU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUTU stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 188.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FUTU is priced at $190.64, while LGHL trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUTU currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUTU's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FUTU is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUTU.Check LGHL's competition here