Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FIGR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIGR | $35.07 | -2.96% | 6.2B | 79.70 | $0.44 | N/A |
| MS | $154.87 | +0.32% | 245.9B | 15.16 | $10.22 | +2.54% |
| GS | $782.21 | -0.67% | 234.6B | 15.24 | $51.32 | +1.97% |
| GS-PD | $19.39 | -1.57% | 206.5B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.97% |
| GS-PA | $19.56 | -1.26% | 202B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.97% |
| SCHW | $93.06 | +1.99% | 165.4B | 20.02 | $4.65 | +1.21% |
| GS-PJ | $25.20 | -0.03% | 68.9B | 0.49 | $51.53 | +1.97% |
| MS-PA | $19.46 | -0.66% | 68.4B | 2.47 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS-PI | $25.25 | -0.32% | 67.3B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
| MS-PK | $24.29 | -0.96% | 66.2B | 3.10 | $7.86 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
FIGR vs MS Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 245.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS trades at $154.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS's competition here
FIGR vs GS Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 234.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS trades at $782.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS's competition here
FIGR vs GS-PD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS-PD trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS-PD's competition here
FIGR vs GS-PA Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 202B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS-PA trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS-PA's competition here
FIGR vs SCHW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 165.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SCHW trades at $93.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SCHW's competition here
FIGR vs GS-PJ Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS-PJ's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PA Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PA trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PA's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PI Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PI trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PI's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PK Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PK trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PK's competition here
FIGR vs HOOD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while HOOD trades at $73.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check HOOD's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PF's competition here
FIGR vs GS-PK Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS-PK's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PE Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PE trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PE's competition here
FIGR vs SCHW-PD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PQ Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PQ trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PQ's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PP Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PP trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PP's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PL Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PL trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PL's competition here
FIGR vs SCHW-PJ Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
FIGR vs CRCL Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while CRCL trades at $115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -262.25. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check CRCL's competition here
FIGR vs RJF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while RJF trades at $145.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check RJF's competition here
FIGR vs MS-PO Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MS-PO trades at $17.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MS-PO's competition here
FIGR vs TW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while TW trades at $124.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check TW's competition here
FIGR vs LPLA Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while LPLA trades at $289.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check LPLA's competition here
FIGR vs NMR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while NMR trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check NMR's competition here
FIGR vs STRD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while STRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FIGR has daily volatility of 8.13 and STRD has daily volatility of N/A.Check STRD's competition here
FIGR vs FUTU Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while FUTU trades at $141.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check FUTU's competition here
FIGR vs IREN Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while IREN trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check IREN's competition here
FIGR vs SF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SF trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SF's competition here
FIGR vs EVR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while EVR trades at $268.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check EVR's competition here
FIGR vs HLI Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while HLI trades at $139.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check HLI's competition here
FIGR vs SCE-PJ Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
FIGR vs XP Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while XP trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check XP's competition here
FIGR vs FRHC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while FRHC trades at $131.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 13199.00. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check FRHC's competition here
FIGR vs GS-PC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GS-PC trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GS-PC's competition here
FIGR vs JEF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while JEF trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check JEF's competition here
FIGR vs GLXY Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GLXY trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -36.64. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GLXY's competition here
FIGR vs MKTX Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MKTX trades at $180.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MKTX's competition here
FIGR vs WULF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while WULF trades at $14.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WULF's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check WULF's competition here
FIGR vs VIRT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while VIRT trades at $39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check VIRT's competition here
FIGR vs CIFR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while CIFR trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check CIFR's competition here
FIGR vs SNEX Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SNEX trades at $103.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SNEX's competition here
FIGR vs HUT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while HUT trades at $48.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check HUT's competition here
FIGR vs RJF-PA Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check RJF-PA's competition here
FIGR vs RIOT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while RIOT trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check RIOT's competition here
FIGR vs PIPR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while PIPR trades at $282.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check PIPR's competition here
FIGR vs BGC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BGC trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BGC's competition here
FIGR vs GSIW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GSIW trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GSIW's competition here
FIGR vs LAZ Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while LAZ trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check LAZ's competition here
FIGR vs MC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MC trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MC's competition here
FIGR vs SF-PB Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SF-PB trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SF-PB's competition here
FIGR vs MIAX Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MIAX trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIAX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MIAX's competition here
FIGR vs BMNR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BMNR trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BMNR's competition here
FIGR vs MARA Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MARA trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MARA's competition here
FIGR vs PJT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while PJT trades at $129.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check PJT's competition here
FIGR vs ETOR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while ETOR trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check ETOR's competition here
FIGR vs MRX Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MRX trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MRX's competition here
FIGR vs SF-PC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SF-PC trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SF-PC's competition here
FIGR vs BGCP Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BGCP's competition here
FIGR vs SF-PD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SF-PD trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SF-PD's competition here
FIGR vs CIFRW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check CIFRW's competition here
FIGR vs HKIB Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check HKIB's competition here
FIGR vs PWP Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while PWP trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check PWP's competition here
FIGR vs DFIN Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while DFIN trades at $49.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 43.03. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check DFIN's competition here
FIGR vs TIGR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while TIGR trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check TIGR's competition here
FIGR vs BITF Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BITF trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -17.23. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BITF's competition here
FIGR vs AMRK Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while AMRK trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 168.83. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check AMRK's competition here
FIGR vs GOLD Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GOLD trades at $47.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 98.89. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GOLD's competition here
FIGR vs COWN Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check COWN's competition here
FIGR vs ABTC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 964.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while ABTC trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check ABTC's competition here
FIGR vs GEMI Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 912.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GEMI trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEMI's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GEMI's competition here
FIGR vs OPY Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 876.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while OPY trades at $82.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check OPY's competition here
FIGR vs AC Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check AC's competition here
FIGR vs BTBT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 522.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BTBT trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTBT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BTBT's competition here
FIGR vs BTGO Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 448.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BTGO trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTGO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BTGO's competition here
FIGR vs RJF-PB Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 446.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while RJF-PB trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check RJF-PB's competition here
FIGR vs BASG Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BASG has a market cap of 445.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BASG trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BASG's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BASG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BASG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BASG's competition here
FIGR vs FUFU Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while FUFU trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check FUFU's competition here
FIGR vs MFH Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check MFH's competition here
FIGR vs GHL Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GHL's competition here
FIGR vs BRR Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BRR has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BRR trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BRR's competition here
FIGR vs DEFT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while DEFT trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 64.38. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DEFT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check DEFT's competition here
FIGR vs BASV Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BASV has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BASV trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BASV's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BASV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to BASV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BASV's competition here
FIGR vs SWIN Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SWIN's competition here
FIGR vs AXG Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 157.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while AXG trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check AXG's competition here
FIGR vs WHG Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while WHG trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check WHG's competition here
FIGR vs SRL Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SRL trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -58.07. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SRL's competition here
FIGR vs SUIG Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SUIG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SUIG's competition here
FIGR vs PROP Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while PROP trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check PROP's competition here
FIGR vs TCJH Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check TCJH's competition here
FIGR vs CLSKW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while CLSKW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check CLSKW's competition here
FIGR vs SIEB Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SIEB trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SIEB's competition here
FIGR vs BTCS Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while BTCS trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTCS's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check BTCS's competition here
FIGR vs GRDI Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check GRDI's competition here
FIGR vs TSLW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, TSLW has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while TSLW trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas TSLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSLW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to TSLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check TSLW's competition here
FIGR vs NVDW Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, NVDW has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while NVDW trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas NVDW's P/E ratio is 75.85. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NVDW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to NVDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check NVDW's competition here
FIGR vs DOMH Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while DOMH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DOMH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check DOMH's competition here
FIGR vs PLUT Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while PLUT trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -17.72. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check PLUT's competition here
FIGR vs SDIG Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check SDIG's competition here
FIGR vs HGBL Comparison March 2026
FIGR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FIGR stands at 6.2B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FIGR is priced at $35.07, while HGBL trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FIGR currently has a P/E ratio of 79.70, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FIGR's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FIGR is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FIGR.Check HGBL's competition here