Cohen & Company Inc.
Cohen & Company Inc. COHN Peers
See (COHN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | $9.93 | +0.66% | 20.3M | -8.46 | -$1.17 | +9.97% |
| MS | $140.86 | +0.12% | 225.9B | 16.51 | $8.53 | +2.64% |
| MS-PA | $21.33 | -0.97% | 217.4B | 2.72 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| GS | $707.75 | +2.45% | 217.1B | 16.43 | $43.08 | +1.70% |
| MS-PI | $24.80 | -1.43% | 215.5B | 3.17 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PF | $25.13 | -1.22% | 215.4B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PE | $25.23 | -1.14% | 214.7B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| MS-PK | $23.40 | -1.47% | 213.5B | 3.00 | $7.86 | +2.64% |
| GS-PA | $21.16 | -0.94% | 204.7B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.70% |
| GS-PC | $21.28 | -0.81% | 204B | 1.70 | $12.53 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
COHN vs MS Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 225.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS trades at $140.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PA Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 217.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 217.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS trades at $707.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 215.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PI trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 215.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PE Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 214.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PE trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PK Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 213.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PK trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS-PA Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS-PA trades at $21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS-PC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS-PC trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS-PD Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS-PD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SCHW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 165.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SCHW trades at $91.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SCHW-PD Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS-PJ Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GS-PK Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PQ Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PQ trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PP trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs TW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while TW trades at $146.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PL trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs RJF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while RJF trades at $153.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs LPLA Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while LPLA trades at $374.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MS-PO Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MS-PO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs IBKR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while IBKR trades at $55.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs NMR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while NMR trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs HLI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while HLI trades at $179.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs JEF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while JEF trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SF-PB Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SF-PB trades at $23.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SF trades at $103.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs XP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while XP trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs EVR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while EVR trades at $270.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs FRHC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while FRHC trades at $146.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 104.32. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SCE-PJ Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MKTX Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MKTX trades at $223.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs VIRT Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while VIRT trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MARA Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MARA trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs RJF-PA Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs RJF-PB Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while RJF-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BGC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BGC trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 39.35. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs PIPR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while PIPR trades at $277.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MC trades at $62.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs LAZ Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while LAZ trades at $47.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SNEX Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SNEX trades at $91.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs PJT Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while PJT trades at $165.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs IREN Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while IREN trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MRX Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MRX trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SF-PC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SF-PC trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs FUTU Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while FUTU trades at $123.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs HUT Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while HUT trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SF-PD Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SF-PD trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BGCP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs PWP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while PWP trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -92.48. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs DFIN Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while DFIN trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs WULF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while WULF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.88. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs TIGR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while TIGR trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs CIFR Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while CIFR trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs CIFRW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while CIFRW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs HKIB Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs COWN Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs AC Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while AC trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs OPY Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 684.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while OPY trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs AMRK Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 546.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while AMRK trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs FUFUW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 535.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while FUFUW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs FUFU Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 526.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while FUFU trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 323.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BITF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 467.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BITF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BTBT Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 456.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BTBT trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs HIVE Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while HIVE trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BTM Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BTM trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -33.80. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GHL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SIEB Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 178.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SIEB trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SWIN Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SWIN trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs WHG Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while WHG trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 389.75. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs PROP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while PROP trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs CLSKW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while CLSKW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs TCJH Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SRL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SRL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs HGBL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while HGBL trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GRDI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GRYP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GRYP trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs BTCS Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while BTCS trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs TOP Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MDBH Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 44.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MDBH trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SDIG Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GSIW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GSIW trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs PLUT Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while PLUT trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -44.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs WAI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while WAI trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GREE Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GREE trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SAI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs NCPL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while NCPL trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs ARBK Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while ARBK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs ABTS Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while ABTS trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs ATIF Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MIGI Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MIGI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs NCPLW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MEGL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MEGL trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs LGHLW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs GRDIW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs SAITW Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs MFH Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 681.1K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while MFH trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -48.12. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.
COHN vs LGHL Comparison
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 365.8K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $9.93, while LGHL trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.46, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.