Cohen & Company Inc.
Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COHN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | $11.85 | -1.90% | 320.6M | -10.13 | -$1.17 | +8.44% |
| MS | $143.01 | +0.36% | 228.5B | 16.20 | $8.83 | +2.59% |
| MS-PE | $25.49 | +0.16% | 227.9B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PA | $21.73 | -0.14% | 227.9B | 2.77 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PF | $25.21 | +0.04% | 227.8B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PK | $23.80 | -0.25% | 227B | 3.03 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PI | $24.85 | -0.32% | 225.7B | 3.16 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| GS | $728.98 | +1.36% | 223.5B | 16.05 | $45.38 | +1.65% |
| GS-PD | $21.11 | -1.77% | 220.7B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.65% |
| GS-PA | $21.70 | -1.36% | 220.3B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
COHN vs MS Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 228.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS trades at $143.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS's competition here
COHN vs MS-PE Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PE trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PE's competition here
COHN vs MS-PA Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PA trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PA's competition here
COHN vs MS-PF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 227.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PF trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PF's competition here
COHN vs MS-PK Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 227B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PK trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PK's competition here
COHN vs MS-PI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 225.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PI trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PI's competition here
COHN vs GS Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 223.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS trades at $728.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS's competition here
COHN vs GS-PD Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 220.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS-PD trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PD's competition here
COHN vs GS-PA Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS-PA trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PA's competition here
COHN vs GS-PC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 220B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS-PC trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PC's competition here
COHN vs SCHW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SCHW trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW's competition here
COHN vs SCHW-PD Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
COHN vs GS-PJ Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PJ's competition here
COHN vs GS-PK Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PK's competition here
COHN vs MS-PP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PP trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PP's competition here
COHN vs MS-PQ Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PQ trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PQ's competition here
COHN vs SCHW-PJ Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
COHN vs RJF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while RJF trades at $168.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF's competition here
COHN vs TW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while TW trades at $139.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 57.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TW's competition here
COHN vs MS-PL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PL trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PL's competition here
COHN vs LPLA Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while LPLA trades at $380.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LPLA's competition here
COHN vs IBKR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while IBKR trades at $65.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check IBKR's competition here
COHN vs MS-PO Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MS-PO trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PO's competition here
COHN vs NMR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while NMR trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NMR's competition here
COHN vs HLI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while HLI trades at $195.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HLI's competition here
COHN vs JEF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while JEF trades at $57.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check JEF's competition here
COHN vs EVR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while EVR trades at $301.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check EVR's competition here
COHN vs SF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SF trades at $112.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF's competition here
COHN vs SF-PB Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SF-PB trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PB's competition here
COHN vs FRHC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while FRHC trades at $172.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 123.38. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FRHC's competition here
COHN vs SCE-PJ Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
COHN vs XP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while XP trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check XP's competition here
COHN vs MKTX Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MKTX trades at $211.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 36.76. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MKTX's competition here
COHN vs VIRT Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while VIRT trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check VIRT's competition here
COHN vs MARA Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MARA trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MARA's competition here
COHN vs PIPR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while PIPR trades at $314.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PIPR's competition here
COHN vs RJF-PA Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF-PA's competition here
COHN vs MC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MC trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 32.02. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MC's competition here
COHN vs LAZ Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while LAZ trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LAZ's competition here
COHN vs RJF-PB Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while RJF-PB trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF-PB's competition here
COHN vs BGC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BGC trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BGC's competition here
COHN vs SNEX Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SNEX trades at $94.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SNEX's competition here
COHN vs PJT Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while PJT trades at $184.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PJT's competition here
COHN vs IREN Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while IREN trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -57.16. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check IREN's competition here
COHN vs FUTU Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while FUTU trades at $163.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUTU's competition here
COHN vs MRX Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MRX trades at $37.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MRX's competition here
COHN vs SF-PC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SF-PC trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PC's competition here
COHN vs HUT Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while HUT trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -30.86. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HUT's competition here
COHN vs CIFR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while CIFR trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CIFR's competition here
COHN vs CIFRW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while CIFRW trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CIFRW's competition here
COHN vs WULF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while WULF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -15.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WULF's competition here
COHN vs PWP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while PWP trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -97.90. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PWP's competition here
COHN vs TIGR Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while TIGR trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TIGR's competition here
COHN vs SF-PD Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SF-PD trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PD's competition here
COHN vs DFIN Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while DFIN trades at $64.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check DFIN's competition here
COHN vs BGCP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BGCP's competition here
COHN vs HKIB Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HKIB's competition here
COHN vs COWN Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check COWN's competition here
COHN vs BTBT Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BTBT trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTBT's competition here
COHN vs AC Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 790.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while AC trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check AC's competition here
COHN vs OPY Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 760.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while OPY trades at $72.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check OPY's competition here
COHN vs BITF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 683.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BITF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BITF's competition here
COHN vs FUFU Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 623.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while FUFU trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 382.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUFU's competition here
COHN vs FUFUW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while FUFUW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUFUW's competition here
COHN vs AMRK Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 544M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while AMRK trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check AMRK's competition here
COHN vs HIVE Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while HIVE trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -113.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HIVE's competition here
COHN vs GHL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GHL's competition here
COHN vs SWIN Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SWIN trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SWIN's competition here
COHN vs MFH Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MFH trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -33.87. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MFH's competition here
COHN vs WHG Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while WHG trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 449.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WHG's competition here
COHN vs PROP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while PROP trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PROP's competition here
COHN vs SIEB Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SIEB trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SIEB's competition here
COHN vs BTM Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BTM trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -35.47. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTM's competition here
COHN vs BTCS Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while BTCS trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTCS's competition here
COHN vs CLSKW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while CLSKW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CLSKW's competition here
COHN vs SRL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SRL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SRL's competition here
COHN vs TCJH Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TCJH's competition here
COHN vs GRYP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GRYP trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRYP's competition here
COHN vs HGBL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while HGBL trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HGBL's competition here
COHN vs GRDI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRDI's competition here
COHN vs PLUT Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while PLUT trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -59.60. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PLUT's competition here
COHN vs TOP Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TOP's competition here
COHN vs MDBH Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MDBH trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MDBH's competition here
COHN vs SDIG Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SDIG's competition here
COHN vs GREE Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GREE trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GREE's competition here
COHN vs ARBK Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while ARBK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ARBK's competition here
COHN vs SAI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SAI's competition here
COHN vs NCPLW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NCPLW's competition here
COHN vs NCPL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while NCPL trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NCPL's competition here
COHN vs MEGL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MEGL trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MEGL's competition here
COHN vs ABTS Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while ABTS trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ABTS's competition here
COHN vs MIGI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while MIGI trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MIGI's competition here
COHN vs ATIF Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ATIF's competition here
COHN vs WAI Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while WAI trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WAI's competition here
COHN vs GSIW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GSIW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GSIW's competition here
COHN vs LGHLW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LGHLW's competition here
COHN vs GRDIW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRDIW's competition here
COHN vs SAITW Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SAITW's competition here
COHN vs LGHL Comparison July 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 320.6M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 289.1K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $11.85, while LGHL trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.13, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LGHL's competition here