Cohen & Company Inc.
Cohen & Company Inc. (COHN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COHN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COHN | $12.74 | +0.00% | 25.6M | 11.24 | $1.12 | +8.27% |
| MS-PF | $25.35 | +0.00% | 236.4B | 3.23 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PI | $25.17 | +0.02% | 236.2B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PA | $21.97 | +0.00% | 235.7B | 2.79 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PK | $24.14 | +0.00% | 235.6B | 3.07 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS-PE | $25.62 | -0.02% | 235.1B | 3.25 | $7.86 | +2.60% |
| MS | $148.51 | +0.00% | 230.9B | 16.36 | $8.84 | +2.60% |
| GS-PA | $21.89 | +0.00% | 226.2B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.64% |
| GS-PC | $21.64 | +0.00% | 225.6B | 1.72 | $12.53 | +1.64% |
| GS-PD | $21.19 | +0.00% | 225.2B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
COHN vs MS-PF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PF trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PF's competition here
COHN vs MS-PI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 236.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PI trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PI's competition here
COHN vs MS-PA Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PA trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PA's competition here
COHN vs MS-PK Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 235.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PK trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PK's competition here
COHN vs MS-PE Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 235.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PE trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PE's competition here
COHN vs MS Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 230.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS trades at $148.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS's competition here
COHN vs GS-PA Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 226.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS-PA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PA's competition here
COHN vs GS-PC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 225.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS-PC trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PC's competition here
COHN vs GS-PD Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS-PD trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PD's competition here
COHN vs GS Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS trades at $747.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS's competition here
COHN vs SCHW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 174.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SCHW trades at $97.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW's competition here
COHN vs SCHW-PD Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 173.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SCHW-PD trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
COHN vs GS-PJ Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PJ's competition here
COHN vs GS-PK Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GS-PK's competition here
COHN vs MS-PQ Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PQ trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PQ's competition here
COHN vs MS-PP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PP trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PP's competition here
COHN vs SCHW-PJ Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
COHN vs RJF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while RJF trades at $164.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF's competition here
COHN vs MS-PL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PL trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PL's competition here
COHN vs TW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while TW trades at $130.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 50.47. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TW's competition here
COHN vs IBKR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while IBKR trades at $63.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check IBKR's competition here
COHN vs MS-PO Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MS-PO trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MS-PO's competition here
COHN vs LPLA Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while LPLA trades at $355.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LPLA's competition here
COHN vs NMR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while NMR trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NMR's competition here
COHN vs HLI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while HLI trades at $194.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HLI's competition here
COHN vs JEF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while JEF trades at $61.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check JEF's competition here
COHN vs EVR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while EVR trades at $313.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check EVR's competition here
COHN vs SF-PB Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SF-PB trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PB's competition here
COHN vs SF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SF trades at $115.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF's competition here
COHN vs FRHC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while FRHC trades at $172.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 129.24. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FRHC's competition here
COHN vs XP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while XP trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check XP's competition here
COHN vs SCE-PJ Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SCE-PJ trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
COHN vs MKTX Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MKTX trades at $187.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MKTX's competition here
COHN vs VIRT Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while VIRT trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check VIRT's competition here
COHN vs MARA Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MARA trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MARA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MARA's competition here
COHN vs PIPR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while PIPR trades at $331.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PIPR's competition here
COHN vs RJF-PA Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF-PA's competition here
COHN vs MC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MC trades at $74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MC's competition here
COHN vs LAZ Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while LAZ trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LAZ's competition here
COHN vs RJF-PB Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while RJF-PB trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check RJF-PB's competition here
COHN vs BGC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BGC trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BGC's competition here
COHN vs SNEX Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SNEX trades at $91.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SNEX's competition here
COHN vs IREN Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while IREN trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -63.52. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check IREN's competition here
COHN vs PJT Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while PJT trades at $183.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PJT's ROE of +553.41%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PJT's competition here
COHN vs WULF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while WULF trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -25.63. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WULF's competition here
COHN vs FUTU Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while FUTU trades at $174.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUTU's competition here
COHN vs MRX Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MRX trades at $35.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MRX's competition here
COHN vs HUT Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while HUT trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HUT's competition here
COHN vs SF-PC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SF-PC trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PC's competition here
COHN vs CIFR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while CIFR trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CIFR's competition here
COHN vs CIFRW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while CIFRW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CIFRW's competition here
COHN vs PWP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while PWP trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PWP's competition here
COHN vs SF-PD Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SF-PD trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SF-PD's competition here
COHN vs TIGR Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while TIGR trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TIGR's competition here
COHN vs BGCP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BGCP's competition here
COHN vs HKIB Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HKIB's competition here
COHN vs DFIN Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while DFIN trades at $55.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check DFIN's competition here
COHN vs COWN Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check COWN's competition here
COHN vs BTBT Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 963.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BTBT trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTBT's competition here
COHN vs AC Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 777.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while AC trades at $36.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check AC's competition here
COHN vs OPY Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while OPY trades at $72.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check OPY's competition here
COHN vs BITF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 702.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BITF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BITF's competition here
COHN vs FUFUW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 688.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while FUFUW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUFUW's competition here
COHN vs FUFU Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 618.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while FUFU trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 377.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check FUFU's competition here
COHN vs AMRK Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 577.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while AMRK trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check AMRK's competition here
COHN vs HIVE Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 475.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while HIVE trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HIVE's competition here
COHN vs GHL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GHL's competition here
COHN vs MFH Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MFH trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -53.75. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MFH's competition here
COHN vs SWIN Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SWIN trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SWIN's competition here
COHN vs BTCS Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 211M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BTCS trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTCS's competition here
COHN vs WHG Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while WHG trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WHG's competition here
COHN vs SIEB Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SIEB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SIEB's competition here
COHN vs PROP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while PROP trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PROP's competition here
COHN vs BTM Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while BTM trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -203.50. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check BTM's competition here
COHN vs GRYP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GRYP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRYP's competition here
COHN vs CLSKW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while CLSKW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check CLSKW's competition here
COHN vs TCJH Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TCJH's competition here
COHN vs SRL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SRL trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SRL's competition here
COHN vs GRDI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRDI's competition here
COHN vs HGBL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while HGBL trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check HGBL's competition here
COHN vs PLUT Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while PLUT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -59.40. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check PLUT's competition here
COHN vs TOP Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while TOP trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check TOP's competition here
COHN vs SDIG Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SDIG's competition here
COHN vs MDBH Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MDBH trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MDBH's competition here
COHN vs GREE Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GREE trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GREE's competition here
COHN vs SAI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SAI's competition here
COHN vs ARBK Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while ARBK trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ARBK's competition here
COHN vs MEGL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MEGL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MEGL's competition here
COHN vs NCPLW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NCPLW's competition here
COHN vs ABTS Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while ABTS trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ABTS's competition here
COHN vs NCPL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while NCPL trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check NCPL's competition here
COHN vs MIGI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while MIGI trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check MIGI's competition here
COHN vs GSIW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GSIW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GSIW's competition here
COHN vs ATIF Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check ATIF's competition here
COHN vs WAI Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while WAI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check WAI's competition here
COHN vs GRDIW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check GRDIW's competition here
COHN vs SAITW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check SAITW's competition here
COHN vs LGHLW Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 268.1K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LGHLW's competition here
COHN vs LGHL Comparison August 2025
COHN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COHN stands at 25.6M. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 242.8K. Regarding current trading prices, COHN is priced at $12.74, while LGHL trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COHN currently has a P/E ratio of 11.24, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, COHN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, COHN is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COHN.Check LGHL's competition here