Cipher Mining Inc.
Cipher Mining Inc. CIFR Peers
See (CIFR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFR | $4.59 | +9.55% | 1.4B | -11.18 | -$0.38 | N/A |
| MS | $139.79 | +0.03% | 225.7B | 16.49 | $8.53 | +2.63% |
| MS-PA | $21.31 | -1.10% | 219B | 2.74 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PF | $25.09 | -1.38% | 218.1B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PE | $25.20 | -1.47% | 217.6B | 3.25 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PI | $24.94 | -1.07% | 217.6B | 3.20 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| MS-PK | $23.51 | -1.51% | 215.3B | 3.03 | $7.86 | +2.63% |
| GS | $705.40 | +2.66% | 212B | 16.04 | $43.08 | +1.74% |
| GS-PC | $21.48 | +0.00% | 205.3B | 1.71 | $12.53 | +1.74% |
| GS-PA | $21.26 | -0.33% | 205.3B | 0.41 | $51.53 | +1.74% |
Stock Comparison
CIFR vs MS Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 225.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS trades at $139.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PA Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PA trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 218.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PE Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PE trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 217.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PI trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PK Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 215.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PK trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS trades at $705.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS-PC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS-PC trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS-PA Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 205.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS-PA trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS-PD Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 204.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS-PD trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SCHW-PD Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SCHW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SCHW trades at $90.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs IBKR Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while IBKR trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS-PJ Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GS-PK Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PQ Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PQ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PP trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs TW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while TW trades at $143.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SCHW-PJ Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SCHW-PJ trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PL trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs RJF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while RJF trades at $152.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs LPLA Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while LPLA trades at $368.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MS-PO Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MS-PO trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs NMR Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while NMR trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs HLI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while HLI trades at $181.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs JEF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while JEF trades at $55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SF trades at $103.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs EVR Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while EVR trades at $268.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs XP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while XP trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SF-PB Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SF-PB trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs FRHC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while FRHC trades at $143.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 102.90. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SCE-PJ Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SCE-PJ trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MKTX Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MKTX trades at $219.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs VIRT Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while VIRT trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs RJF-PA Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MARA Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MARA trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs RJF-PB Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while RJF-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs PIPR Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while PIPR trades at $278.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BGC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BGC trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MC trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs LAZ Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while LAZ trades at $48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SNEX Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SNEX trades at $90.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs PJT Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while PJT trades at $164.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs IREN Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while IREN trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -45.08. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MRX Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MRX trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SF-PC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SF-PC trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs FUTU Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while FUTU trades at $123.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs HUT Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while HUT trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -26.76. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SF-PD Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SF-PD trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs PWP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while PWP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -94.67. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BGCP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs DFIN Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while DFIN trades at $61.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs WULF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while WULF trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WULF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs TIGR Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while TIGR trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs HKIB Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs CIFRW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while CIFRW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs COWN Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs AC Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 789.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while AC trades at $37.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs OPY Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 690.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while OPY trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs AMRK Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 521.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while AMRK trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs FUFU Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 499.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while FUFU trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 306.50. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs FUFUW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while FUFUW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BTBT Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 419.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BTBT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BITF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BITF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs HIVE Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while HIVE trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BTM Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BTM trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -33.80. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GHL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SIEB Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 195.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SIEB trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SWIN Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SWIN trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs WHG Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while WHG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 386.75. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs PROP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while PROP trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs CLSKW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while CLSKW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs TCJH Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SRL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SRL trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs HGBL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while HGBL trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GRDI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GRYP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GRYP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs TOP Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while TOP trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs BTCS Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while BTCS trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SDIG Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MDBH Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MDBH trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GSIW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GSIW trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs PLUT Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while PLUT trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -44.40. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs ARBK Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while ARBK trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs WAI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while WAI trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs COHN Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while COHN trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SAI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GREE Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GREE trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs NCPL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while NCPL trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs ABTS Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while ABTS trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MIGI Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MIGI trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs ATIF Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs NCPLW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while NCPLW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MEGL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MEGL trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs LGHLW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs GRDIW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs SAITW Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs MFH Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 691.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while MFH trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -48.87. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.
CIFR vs LGHL Comparison
CIFR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIFR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 313.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CIFR is priced at $4.59, while LGHL trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIFR currently has a P/E ratio of -11.18, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIFR's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CIFR is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIFR.