Wrap Technologies, Inc.
Wrap Technologies, Inc. (WRAP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WRAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRAP | $1.78 | +4.09% | 84.1M | -4.94 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| APH | $151.20 | +0.11% | 181.7B | 44.26 | $3.34 | +0.51% |
| GLW | $129.99 | -6.82% | 124.6B | 79.38 | $1.83 | +0.78% |
| SNDK | $621.09 | -4.44% | 98.4B | -89.46 | -$7.45 | N/A |
| TEL | $232.40 | -0.99% | 67.9B | 33.27 | $6.95 | +1.23% |
| GRMN | $239.80 | -3.66% | 47.5B | 30.44 | $8.11 | +1.40% |
| KEYS | $239.54 | -1.64% | 42.1B | 48.84 | $5.02 | N/A |
| COHR | $232.48 | -6.33% | 39.5B | 243.91 | $1.02 | N/A |
| CLS | $291.33 | -0.46% | 34.1B | 41.40 | $7.17 | N/A |
| TDY | $666.35 | -0.35% | 31.6B | 35.67 | $18.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WRAP vs APH Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while APH trades at $151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.26. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check APH's competition here
WRAP vs GLW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while GLW trades at $129.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 79.38. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check GLW's competition here
WRAP vs SNDK Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 98.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SNDK trades at $621.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -89.46. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SNDK's competition here
WRAP vs TEL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while TEL trades at $232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check TEL's competition here
WRAP vs GRMN Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while GRMN trades at $239.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check GRMN's competition here
WRAP vs KEYS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while KEYS trades at $239.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check KEYS's competition here
WRAP vs COHR Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while COHR trades at $232.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 243.91. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check COHR's competition here
WRAP vs CLS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while CLS trades at $291.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check CLS's competition here
WRAP vs TDY Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while TDY trades at $666.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 35.67. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check TDY's competition here
WRAP vs IIVI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check IIVI's competition here
WRAP vs JBL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while JBL trades at $262.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check JBL's competition here
WRAP vs FLEX Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while FLEX trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check FLEX's competition here
WRAP vs FN Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while FN trades at $513.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 55.24. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check FN's competition here
WRAP vs FTV Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while FTV trades at $57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check FTV's competition here
WRAP vs WDCVV Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check WDCVV's competition here
WRAP vs MKSI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MKSI trades at $249.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MKSI's competition here
WRAP vs TRMB Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while TRMB trades at $67.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check TRMB's competition here
WRAP vs TTMI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while TTMI trades at $100.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 63.60. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check TTMI's competition here
WRAP vs CGNX Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while CGNX trades at $55.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 83.04. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check CGNX's competition here
WRAP vs LFUS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LFUS trades at $363.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -127.47. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LFUS's competition here
WRAP vs SANM Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SANM trades at $148.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SANM's competition here
WRAP vs VICR Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while VICR trades at $152.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check VICR's competition here
WRAP vs ESE Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ESE trades at $272.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.56. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ESE's competition here
WRAP vs VNT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while VNT trades at $41.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check VNT's competition here
WRAP vs ST Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ST trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ST's P/E ratio is -205.61. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ST's competition here
WRAP vs PLXS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while PLXS trades at $196.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check PLXS's competition here
WRAP vs NOVT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while NOVT trades at $144.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 97.52. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check NOVT's competition here
WRAP vs OSIS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OSIS trades at $286.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OSIS's competition here
WRAP vs BMI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BMI trades at $161.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BMI's competition here
WRAP vs ITRI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ITRI trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ITRI's competition here
WRAP vs BELFA Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BELFA trades at $214.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BELFA's competition here
WRAP vs BELFB Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BELFB trades at $230.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BELFB's competition here
WRAP vs NOVTU Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while NOVTU trades at $62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check NOVTU's competition here
WRAP vs BHE Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BHE trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 84.99. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BHE's competition here
WRAP vs ROG Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ROG trades at $111.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -28.99. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ROG's competition here
WRAP vs CTS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while CTS trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check CTS's competition here
WRAP vs DAKT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while DAKT trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 229.17. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check DAKT's competition here
WRAP vs ALNT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ALNT trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ALNT's competition here
WRAP vs OUST Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OUST trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OUST's competition here
WRAP vs PENG Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while PENG trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check PENG's competition here
WRAP vs FARO Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check FARO's competition here
WRAP vs OUST-WTA Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
WRAP vs BKSY Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 694.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BKSY trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BKSY's competition here
WRAP vs LYTS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 665.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LYTS trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LYTS's competition here
WRAP vs VPG Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 620.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while VPG trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 116.78. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check VPG's competition here
WRAP vs AMOT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check AMOT's competition here
WRAP vs MLAB Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MLAB trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 144.35. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MLAB's competition here
WRAP vs LPTH Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 488.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LPTH trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LPTH's competition here
WRAP vs OUST-WT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OUST-WT's competition here
WRAP vs KOPN Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 379.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while KOPN trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -107.50. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check KOPN's competition here
WRAP vs SATL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 320.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SATL trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SATL's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SATL's competition here
WRAP vs BKSY-WT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
WRAP vs MEI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MEI trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MEI's competition here
WRAP vs VLDR Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check VLDR's competition here
WRAP vs MVIS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MVIS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MVIS's competition here
WRAP vs OPTX Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OPTX trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -71.25. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OPTX's competition here
WRAP vs MPTI Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MPTI trades at $65.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MPTI's competition here
WRAP vs RELL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while RELL trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 259.40. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check RELL's competition here
WRAP vs EMAN Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check EMAN's competition here
WRAP vs SLNHP Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SLNHP trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SLNHP's competition here
WRAP vs KULR Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 127M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while KULR trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check KULR's competition here
WRAP vs SATLW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SATLW trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SATLW's competition here
WRAP vs ODYS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ODYS trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ODYS's competition here
WRAP vs GNSS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while GNSS trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check GNSS's competition here
WRAP vs MIND Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MIND trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MIND's competition here
WRAP vs SOTK Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SOTK trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SOTK's competition here
WRAP vs CPSH Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while CPSH trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -108.75. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to CPSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check CPSH's competition here
WRAP vs ELTK Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ELTK trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ELTK's competition here
WRAP vs DSWL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while DSWL trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check DSWL's competition here
WRAP vs LINK Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LINK trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -26.46. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LINK's competition here
WRAP vs UEIC Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while UEIC trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check UEIC's competition here
WRAP vs LUNA Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LUNA trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LUNA's competition here
WRAP vs ACFN Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ACFN trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ACFN's competition here
WRAP vs LGL Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while LGL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check LGL's competition here
WRAP vs REFR Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while REFR trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check REFR's competition here
WRAP vs WBX Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while WBX trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check WBX's competition here
WRAP vs OPTXW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OPTXW trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OPTXW's competition here
WRAP vs ISNS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ISNS's competition here
WRAP vs HOLO Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while HOLO trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check HOLO's competition here
WRAP vs NEON Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while NEON trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check NEON's competition here
WRAP vs SLNH Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SLNH trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SLNH's ROE of +9.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SLNH's competition here
WRAP vs DAIO Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while DAIO trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check DAIO's competition here
WRAP vs SELX Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SELX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SELX's competition here
WRAP vs NSYS Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while NSYS trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check NSYS's competition here
WRAP vs TMPOW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check TMPOW's competition here
WRAP vs SGMA Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SGMA's competition here
WRAP vs VIAO Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check VIAO's competition here
WRAP vs WATT Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while WATT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to WATT's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check WATT's competition here
WRAP vs KNW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check KNW's competition here
WRAP vs ELSE Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while ELSE trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check ELSE's competition here
WRAP vs MTEK Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MTEK trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MTEK's competition here
WRAP vs SVREW Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SVREW's competition here
WRAP vs OST Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check OST's competition here
WRAP vs GAUZ Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while GAUZ trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check GAUZ's competition here
WRAP vs SVRE Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while SVRE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check SVRE's competition here
WRAP vs BNSO Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check BNSO's competition here
WRAP vs MINDP Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check MINDP's competition here
WRAP vs AMPGZ Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while AMPGZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check AMPGZ's competition here
WRAP vs FCUV Comparison February 2026
WRAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRAP stands at 84.1M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRAP is priced at $1.78, while FCUV trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRAP currently has a P/E ratio of -4.94, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, WRAP's ROE is -1.95%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WRAP is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRAP.Check FCUV's competition here