Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $169.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check APH's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 144.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $167.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 62.26. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check GLW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $355.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 67.61. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check COHR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $354.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 40.88. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check KEYS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $309.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check GRMN's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $124.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check FLEX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $366.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check JBL's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while CLS trades at $339.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 44.21. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check CLS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $686.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check TDY's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check IIVI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $306.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MKSI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $571.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check FN's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check WDCVV's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $138.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check TTMI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $337.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check AEIS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $56.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check TRMB's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $459.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check LFUS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $208.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SANM's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $226.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 75.63. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check VICR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $60.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check CGNX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $72.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to RAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check RAL's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $300.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.22. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ESE's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $20.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check RIOT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $271.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check PLXS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $167.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 48.00. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check NOVT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $102.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ITRI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $92.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OLED's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $231.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OSIS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $294.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check BELFB's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $237.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check BELFA's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $39.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check KN's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while PENG trades at $58.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check PENG's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $81.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check BHE's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while INFQ trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check INFQ's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $69.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check NOVTU's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $138.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 48.17. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ROG's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $63.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check CTS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 996.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check DAKT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 935.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $70.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 159.59. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check VPG's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 918.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SATLW trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -34.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SATLW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $13.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -80.76. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check LPTH's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check FARO's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 601.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $16.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MEI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check AMOT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 363M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OPTXW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -79.96. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OPTX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $11.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SLNHP's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $85.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MPTI's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 300.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 66.35. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check RELL's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check VLDR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 213M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SLNH's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check EMAN's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check USBC's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MVIS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check WRAP's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while WATT trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check WATT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -33.16. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check LINK's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WBX's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check WBX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ODYS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while YIBO trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check YIBO's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $8.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ELTK's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check DSWL's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $18.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ACFN's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while NSYS trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -66.13. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check NSYS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MIND's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 640.69. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check LGL's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MCRP trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MCRP's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ISNS's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check DAIO's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check AMPGR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check ELSE's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while AVX trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check AVX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check TMPOW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SGMA's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check VIAO's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check NEON's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check REFR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check KNW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MTEKW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MTEKW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check WETH's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while HOLOW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check HOLOW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OST's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SVRE's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SVREW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check GAUZ's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check BNSO's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MINDP's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check MMAT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check IMTE's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $5.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check FCUV's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 860.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while EXYNW trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check EXYNW's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 818.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check SOBR's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GMEX has a market cap of 181.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while GMEX trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas GMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GMEX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to GMEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check GMEX's competition here

Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ST stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ST is priced at $46.15 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ST currently has a P/E ratio of 13.19, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ST's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ST is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ST.Check OUSTZ's competition here