Fortive Corporation
Fortive Corporation (FTV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FTV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTV | $58.96 | -0.12% | 18B | 34.51 | $1.71 | +0.40% |
| ETN | $389.30 | +2.53% | 148.1B | 37.36 | $10.21 | +1.12% |
| PH | $864.28 | +0.56% | 109.1B | 31.90 | $27.11 | +0.85% |
| CMI | $649.96 | -2.97% | 88.1B | 33.21 | $19.23 | +1.22% |
| JCI | $138.49 | +0.54% | 82.6B | 41.42 | $3.27 | +1.16% |
| EMR | $136.15 | +2.47% | 75.6B | 31.23 | $4.32 | +1.62% |
| ITW | $251.55 | +0.31% | 71.9B | 23.22 | $10.76 | +2.53% |
| PCAR | $109.39 | -2.02% | 57.5B | 23.26 | $4.70 | +2.51% |
| CARR | $63.37 | -0.35% | 51.6B | 40.12 | $1.55 | +1.49% |
| ROK | $451.81 | +3.57% | 49B | 45.68 | $9.64 | +1.24% |
Stock Comparison
FTV vs ETN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, ETN has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while ETN trades at $389.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ETN's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ETN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ETN's competition here
FTV vs PH Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PH has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PH trades at $864.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PH's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PH's competition here
FTV vs CMI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CMI has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CMI trades at $649.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CMI's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CMI's competition here
FTV vs JCI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while JCI trades at $138.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JCI's competition here
FTV vs EMR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, EMR has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while EMR trades at $136.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas EMR's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to EMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check EMR's competition here
FTV vs ITW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, ITW has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while ITW trades at $251.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ITW's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ITW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ITW's competition here
FTV vs PCAR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PCAR trades at $109.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PCAR's competition here
FTV vs CARR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CARR trades at $63.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CARR's competition here
FTV vs ROK Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, ROK has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while ROK trades at $451.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ROK's P/E ratio is 45.68. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ROK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ROK's competition here
FTV vs SYM Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SYM trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -636.87. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SYM's competition here
FTV vs DOV Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, DOV has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while DOV trades at $209.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DOV's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DOV's competition here
FTV vs IR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, IR has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while IR trades at $70.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas IR's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check IR's competition here
FTV vs OTIS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, OTIS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while OTIS trades at $73.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OTIS's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OTIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OTIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OTIS's competition here
FTV vs P Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, P has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while P trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas P's P/E ratio is 143.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to P's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check P's competition here
FTV vs XYL Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, XYL has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while XYL trades at $110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas XYL's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to XYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check XYL's competition here
FTV vs MAIR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, MAIR has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while MAIR trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MAIR's P/E ratio is 110.93. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAIR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MAIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MAIR's competition here
FTV vs ITT Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, ITT has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while ITT trades at $194.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ITT's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ITT's competition here
FTV vs NDSN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, NDSN has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while NDSN trades at $287.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NDSN's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NDSN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NDSN's competition here
FTV vs IEX Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, IEX has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while IEX trades at $207.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas IEX's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to IEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check IEX's competition here
FTV vs GNRC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GNRC has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GNRC trades at $266.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GNRC's P/E ratio is 77.45. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GNRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GNRC's competition here
FTV vs RRX Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, RRX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while RRX trades at $198.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RRX's P/E ratio is 45.58. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to RRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check RRX's competition here
FTV vs GGG Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GGG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GGG trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GGG's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to GGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GGG's competition here
FTV vs PNR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PNR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PNR trades at $74.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PNR's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PNR's competition here
FTV vs SPXC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SPXC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SPXC trades at $205.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SPXC's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SPXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SPXC's competition here
FTV vs CR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CR trades at $179.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CR's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CR's competition here
FTV vs WTS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, WTS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while WTS trades at $302.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WTS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WTS's competition here
FTV vs GTLS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GTLS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GTLS trades at $208.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GTLS's P/E ratio is -204.20. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTLS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to GTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GTLS's competition here
FTV vs DCI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, DCI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while DCI trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas DCI's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to DCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check DCI's competition here
FTV vs FLS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, FLS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while FLS trades at $69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas FLS's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FLS's competition here
FTV vs AOS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AOS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AOS trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AOS's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AOS's competition here
FTV vs OSK Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while OSK trades at $128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OSK's competition here
FTV vs JBTM Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, JBTM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while JBTM trades at $132.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas JBTM's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBTM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JBTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JBTM's competition here
FTV vs MIDD Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, MIDD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while MIDD trades at $146.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MIDD's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIDD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MIDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MIDD's competition here
FTV vs AEBIV Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AEBIV has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AEBIV trades at $83.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AEBIV's P/E ratio is 213.49. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEBIV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to AEBIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AEBIV's competition here
FTV vs NPO Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, NPO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while NPO trades at $306.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NPO's P/E ratio is 147.74. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NPO's competition here
FTV vs GTES Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GTES has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GTES trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GTES's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GTES's competition here
FTV vs PSN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PSN trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PSN's competition here
FTV vs CSWI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CSWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CSWI trades at $305.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CSWI's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSWI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CSWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CSWI's competition here
FTV vs CSW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CSW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CSW trades at $264.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CSW's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CSW's competition here
FTV vs XMTR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, XMTR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while XMTR trades at $88.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas XMTR's P/E ratio is -85.19. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XMTR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to XMTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check XMTR's competition here
FTV vs MIR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, MIR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while MIR trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MIR's P/E ratio is 176.20. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MIR's competition here
FTV vs FELE Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, FELE has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while FELE trades at $97.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas FELE's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FELE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to FELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check FELE's competition here
FTV vs AIMC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AIMC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AIMC trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AIMC's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIMC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to AIMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AIMC's competition here
FTV vs JBT Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, JBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while JBT trades at $125.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas JBT's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JBT's competition here
FTV vs MWA Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, MWA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while MWA trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MWA's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MWA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MWA's competition here
FTV vs KAI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, KAI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while KAI trades at $317.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KAI's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KAI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KAI's competition here
FTV vs GTLS-PB Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GTLS-PB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GTLS-PB trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GTLS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTLS-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to GTLS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GTLS-PB's competition here
FTV vs ATS Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, ATS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while ATS trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas ATS's P/E ratio is 235.64. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to ATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check ATS's competition here
FTV vs SXI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SXI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SXI trades at $254.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SXI's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SXI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SXI's competition here
FTV vs HLIO Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, HLIO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while HLIO trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HLIO's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HLIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HLIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HLIO's competition here
FTV vs BW-PA Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BW-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BW-PA trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BW-PA's P/E ratio is 78.57. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BW-PA's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BW-PA's competition here
FTV vs MIR-WT Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, MIR-WT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while MIR-WT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas MIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MIR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to MIR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check MIR-WT's competition here
FTV vs AMSC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AMSC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AMSC trades at $50.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AMSC's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMSC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AMSC's competition here
FTV vs BW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BW trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BW's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BW's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BW's competition here
FTV vs CXT Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CXT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CXT trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CXT's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CXT's competition here
FTV vs HI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, HI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while HI trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HI's P/E ratio is 65.27. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to HI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HI's competition here
FTV vs THR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, THR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while THR trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas THR's P/E ratio is 47.88. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to THR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check THR's competition here
FTV vs CFX Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CFX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CFX trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CFX's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CFX's competition here
FTV vs CYD Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CYD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CYD trades at $57.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CYD's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CYD's competition here
FTV vs SHPW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SHPW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SHPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SHPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to SHPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SHPW's competition here
FTV vs GRC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GRC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GRC trades at $72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GRC's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GRC's competition here
FTV vs EPAC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, EPAC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while EPAC trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas EPAC's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EPAC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to EPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check EPAC's competition here
FTV vs BLDP Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BLDP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BLDP trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BLDP's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BLDP's competition here
FTV vs TNC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, TNC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while TNC trades at $83.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TNC's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TNC's competition here
FTV vs CIR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CIR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CIR trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CIR's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to CIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CIR's competition here
FTV vs NNE Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, NNE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while NNE trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NNE's P/E ratio is -36.88. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NNE's competition here
FTV vs GHM Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GHM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GHM trades at $93.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GHM's P/E ratio is 68.49. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GHM's competition here
FTV vs PSIX Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PSIX has a market cap of 912.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PSIX trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PSIX's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSIX's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PSIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PSIX's competition here
FTV vs KRNT Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, KRNT has a market cap of 666.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while KRNT trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas KRNT's P/E ratio is -37.84. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRNT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to KRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check KRNT's competition here
FTV vs SERV Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SERV has a market cap of 586.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SERV trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SERV's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SERV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SERV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SERV's competition here
FTV vs XE Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, XE has a market cap of 580.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while XE trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas XE's P/E ratio is -53.70. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XE's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to XE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check XE's competition here
FTV vs RR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, RR has a market cap of 492.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while RR trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas RR's P/E ratio is -20.62. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to RR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check RR's competition here
FTV vs PKOH Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PKOH has a market cap of 436.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PKOH trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PKOH's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PKOH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PKOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PKOH's competition here
FTV vs LXFR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, LXFR has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while LXFR trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas LXFR's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LXFR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LXFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LXFR's competition here
FTV vs BGRY Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BGRY has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BGRY trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BGRY's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BGRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to BGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BGRY's competition here
FTV vs SHMD Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SHMD has a market cap of 320.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SHMD trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SHMD's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHMD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SHMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SHMD's competition here
FTV vs OFLX Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, OFLX has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while OFLX trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas OFLX's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OFLX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to OFLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check OFLX's competition here
FTV vs HUHU Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, HUHU has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while HUHU trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HUHU's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUHU's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HUHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HUHU's competition here
FTV vs AIRJ Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AIRJ has a market cap of 269.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AIRJ trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AIRJ's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRJ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AIRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AIRJ's competition here
FTV vs TWIN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, TWIN has a market cap of 229.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while TWIN trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TWIN's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TWIN's competition here
FTV vs TAYD Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, TAYD has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while TAYD trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TAYD's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAYD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TAYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TAYD's competition here
FTV vs NPWR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, NPWR has a market cap of 159.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while NPWR trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas NPWR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPWR's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to NPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check NPWR's competition here
FTV vs HURC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, HURC has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while HURC trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HURC's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HURC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is more volatile compared to HURC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HURC's competition here
FTV vs SHMDW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, SHMDW has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while SHMDW trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas SHMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHMDW's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to SHMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check SHMDW's competition here
FTV vs BWEN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BWEN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BWEN trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BWEN's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BWEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BWEN's competition here
FTV vs PYR Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, PYR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while PYR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas PYR's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PYR's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to PYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check PYR's competition here
FTV vs AIRJW Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while AIRJW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check AIRJW's competition here
FTV vs XCH Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, XCH has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while XCH trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas XCH's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XCH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to XCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check XCH's competition here
FTV vs CVV Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CVV has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CVV trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CVV's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVV's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CVV's competition here
FTV vs BURU Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, BURU has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while BURU trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas BURU's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BURU's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to BURU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check BURU's competition here
FTV vs LASE Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, LASE has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while LASE trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas LASE's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LASE's ROE of -6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to LASE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check LASE's competition here
FTV vs GTEC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, GTEC has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while GTEC trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas GTEC's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to GTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check GTEC's competition here
FTV vs HCAI Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, HCAI has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while HCAI trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas HCAI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HCAI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to HCAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check HCAI's competition here
FTV vs WFF Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, WFF has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while WFF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas WFF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WFF's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to WFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check WFF's competition here
FTV vs CGRN Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CGRN has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CGRN trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CGRN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CGRN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CGRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CGRN's competition here
FTV vs JCSE Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, JCSE has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while JCSE trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas JCSE's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JCSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to JCSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check JCSE's competition here
FTV vs TPIC Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, TPIC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while TPIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas TPIC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TPIC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to TPIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check TPIC's competition here
FTV vs CETY Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, CETY has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while CETY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas CETY's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CETY's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to CETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check CETY's competition here
FTV vs INLF Comparison May 2026
FTV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTV stands at 18B. In comparison, INLF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FTV is priced at $58.96, while INLF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTV currently has a P/E ratio of 34.51, whereas INLF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FTV's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTV is less volatile compared to INLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTV.Check INLF's competition here