Genasys Inc. (GNSS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GNSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNSS | $1.73 | -2.26% | 78.8M | -10.18 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| CSCO | $112.69 | -3.69% | 444.2B | 27.55 | $4.09 | +1.46% |
| MSI | $422.66 | +0.89% | 70.2B | 27.11 | $15.59 | +1.12% |
| NOK | $12.06 | -6.58% | 65.1B | 30.92 | $0.39 | +1.36% |
| CIEN | $422.46 | -8.65% | 59.8B | 92.44 | $4.57 | N/A |
| LITE | $728.32 | -9.09% | 56.7B | 120.98 | $6.02 | N/A |
| CRDO | $241.91 | -6.63% | 45.1B | 70.73 | $3.42 | N/A |
| ERIC | $10.79 | -0.74% | 35.7B | 15.41 | $0.70 | +2.90% |
| UI | $525.38 | -2.05% | 31.8B | 35.59 | $14.76 | +0.61% |
| JNPR | $39.95 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 38.05 | $1.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GNSS vs CSCO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 444.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CSCO trades at $112.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CSCO's competition here
GNSS vs MSI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MSI trades at $422.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MSI's competition here
GNSS vs NOK Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while NOK trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check NOK's competition here
GNSS vs CIEN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CIEN trades at $422.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 92.44. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CIEN's competition here
GNSS vs LITE Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while LITE trades at $728.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 120.98. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check LITE's competition here
GNSS vs CRDO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CRDO trades at $241.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 70.73. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CRDO's competition here
GNSS vs ERIC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ERIC trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ERIC's competition here
GNSS vs UI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while UI trades at $525.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check UI's competition here
GNSS vs JNPR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check JNPR's competition here
GNSS vs ZBRA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ZBRA trades at $267.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ZBRA's competition here
GNSS vs VSAT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while VSAT trades at $83.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is 461.44. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check VSAT's competition here
GNSS vs VIAV Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while VIAV trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 54.10. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check VIAV's competition here
GNSS vs REZI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while REZI trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check REZI's competition here
GNSS vs BDC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while BDC trades at $115.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check BDC's competition here
GNSS vs EVLVW Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while EVLVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check EVLVW's competition here
GNSS vs MAXR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MAXR's competition here
GNSS vs COMM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check COMM's competition here
GNSS vs EXTR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while EXTR trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check EXTR's competition here
GNSS vs ONDS Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ONDS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ONDS's competition here
GNSS vs KN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while KN trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 37.53. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check KN's competition here
GNSS vs VISN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while VISN trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check VISN's competition here
GNSS vs DGII Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while DGII trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check DGII's competition here
GNSS vs INFN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check INFN's competition here
GNSS vs HLIT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while HLIT trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check HLIT's competition here
GNSS vs ARLO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ARLO trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ARLO's competition here
GNSS vs SWIR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SWIR's competition here
GNSS vs ITRN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ITRN trades at $57.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ITRN's competition here
GNSS vs ADTN Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ADTN trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is 39.72. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ADTN's competition here
GNSS vs GILT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 821.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while GILT trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check GILT's competition here
GNSS vs POLY Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check POLY's competition here
GNSS vs FEIM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 635.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while FEIM trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 86.12. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check FEIM's competition here
GNSS vs AIOT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AIOT trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is 145.67. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AIOT's competition here
GNSS vs NTGR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while NTGR trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check NTGR's competition here
GNSS vs PWFL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check PWFL's competition here
GNSS vs CLFD Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CLFD trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 188.72. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CLFD's competition here
GNSS vs BKTI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while BKTI trades at $84.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check BKTI's competition here
GNSS vs ITI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ITI's competition here
GNSS vs AVNW Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AVNW trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AVNW's competition here
GNSS vs SATX Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SATX's competition here
GNSS vs AUDC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AUDC trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AUDC's competition here
GNSS vs LTRX Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while LTRX trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is 42.23. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check LTRX's competition here
GNSS vs SILC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SILC trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -32.76. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SILC's competition here
GNSS vs CRNT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 217.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CRNT trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CRNT's competition here
GNSS vs INSG Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while INSG trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check INSG's competition here
GNSS vs OCC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while OCC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to OCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check OCC's competition here
GNSS vs PCTI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check PCTI's competition here
GNSS vs AMPG Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AMPG trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AMPG's competition here
GNSS vs MOBBW Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MOBBW trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MOBBW's competition here
GNSS vs TESS Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check TESS's competition here
GNSS vs AIRG Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AIRG trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AIRG's competition here
GNSS vs JCS Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check JCS's competition here
GNSS vs MOB Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MOB trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MOB's competition here
GNSS vs CMTL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CMTL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CMTL's competition here
GNSS vs WTT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check WTT's competition here
GNSS vs SYTA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SYTA's competition here
GNSS vs BOSC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while BOSC trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check BOSC's competition here
GNSS vs FKWL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while FKWL trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.22. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check FKWL's competition here
GNSS vs ACCL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ACCL has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ACCL trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ACCL's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ACCL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ACCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ACCL's competition here
GNSS vs UTSI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while UTSI trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check UTSI's competition here
GNSS vs FIEE Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while FIEE trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 54.43. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check FIEE's competition here
GNSS vs MINM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MINM's competition here
GNSS vs CLRO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CLRO trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CLRO's competition here
GNSS vs MTEK Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MTEK trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MTEK's competition here
GNSS vs SYNX Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SYNX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SYNX's competition here
GNSS vs IOTR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while IOTR trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check IOTR's competition here
GNSS vs MITQ Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MITQ trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -28.49. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MITQ's competition here
GNSS vs SONM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SONM trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SONM's competition here
GNSS vs CMBM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CMBM's competition here
GNSS vs CASA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CASA's competition here
GNSS vs MYNA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MYNA's competition here
GNSS vs AMPGW Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check AMPGW's competition here
GNSS vs ASNS Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ASNS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ASNS's competition here
GNSS vs SYTAW Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SYTAW's competition here
GNSS vs VCRA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check VCRA's competition here
GNSS vs ZXZZT Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ZXZZT trades at $32.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ZXZZT's competition here
GNSS vs CALL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check CALL's competition here
GNSS vs PLCM Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is 76.91. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check PLCM's competition here
GNSS vs BRCD Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check BRCD's competition here
GNSS vs GIMO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is -1229.25. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check GIMO's competition here
GNSS vs SATX-WTA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
GNSS vs MITL Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is -96.60. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check MITL's competition here
GNSS vs XXIA Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is -47.10. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check XXIA's competition here
GNSS vs NMRX Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check NMRX's competition here
GNSS vs ORBC Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check ORBC's competition here
GNSS vs OCLR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check OCLR's competition here
GNSS vs RKUS Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is 287.47. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check RKUS's competition here
GNSS vs EXFO Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check EXFO's competition here
GNSS vs SSNI Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check SSNI's competition here
GNSS vs BDR Comparison July 2026
GNSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GNSS stands at 78.8M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GNSS is priced at $1.73, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GNSS currently has a P/E ratio of -10.18, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, GNSS's ROE is -3.15%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GNSS is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GNSS.Check BDR's competition here