Celestica Inc.
Celestica Inc. (CLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | $410.64 | +4.86% | 47.2B | 57.14 | $7.18 | N/A |
| APH | $147.32 | -1.90% | 184.1B | 44.70 | $3.35 | +0.55% |
| GLW | $169.05 | -0.27% | 151.1B | 95.57 | $1.84 | +0.63% |
| SNDK | $1,061.18 | +13.81% | 146.1B | -132.69 | -$7.46 | N/A |
| TEL | $209.29 | -3.88% | 63B | 21.89 | $9.80 | +1.33% |
| KEYS | $339.62 | -1.99% | 59.5B | 61.10 | $5.68 | N/A |
| COHR | $317.81 | -5.88% | 53.3B | 326.30 | $1.03 | N/A |
| GRMN | $256.92 | -1.49% | 49.9B | 30.24 | $8.58 | +1.39% |
| JBL | $338.06 | -0.14% | 36.1B | 45.99 | $7.43 | +0.09% |
| FLEX | $89.49 | +2.97% | 33.8B | 40.99 | $2.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CLS vs APH Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 184.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while APH trades at $147.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check APH's competition here
CLS vs GLW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while GLW trades at $169.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GLW's competition here
CLS vs SNDK Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SNDK trades at $1,061.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -132.69. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SNDK's competition here
CLS vs TEL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while TEL trades at $209.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TEL's competition here
CLS vs KEYS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while KEYS trades at $339.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KEYS's competition here
CLS vs COHR Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while COHR trades at $317.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 326.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check COHR's competition here
CLS vs GRMN Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while GRMN trades at $256.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GRMN's competition here
CLS vs JBL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while JBL trades at $338.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check JBL's competition here
CLS vs FLEX Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while FLEX trades at $89.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FLEX's competition here
CLS vs IIVI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IIVI's competition here
CLS vs TDY Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while TDY trades at $646.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TDY's competition here
CLS vs FN Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while FN trades at $680.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 69.06. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FN's competition here
CLS vs FTV Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while FTV trades at $61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FTV's competition here
CLS vs MKSI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MKSI trades at $273.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 64.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MKSI's competition here
CLS vs WDCVV Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WDCVV's competition here
CLS vs TRMB Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while TRMB trades at $66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TRMB's competition here
CLS vs TTMI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while TTMI trades at $143.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 88.70. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TTMI's competition here
CLS vs VICR Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while VICR trades at $263.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VICR's competition here
CLS vs SANM Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SANM trades at $188.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SANM's competition here
CLS vs LFUS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LFUS trades at $396.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -141.37. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LFUS's competition here
CLS vs CGNX Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while CGNX trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 79.79. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CGNX's competition here
CLS vs ESE Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ESE trades at $316.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 66.33. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ESE's competition here
CLS vs PLXS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while PLXS trades at $247.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PLXS's competition here
CLS vs ST Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ST trades at $41.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 198.62. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ST's competition here
CLS vs VNT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while VNT trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VNT's competition here
CLS vs OSIS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OSIS trades at $286.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OSIS's competition here
CLS vs NOVT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while NOVT trades at $132.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 91.22. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVT's competition here
CLS vs MDA Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MDA trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 52.87. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MDA's competition here
CLS vs ITRI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ITRI trades at $87.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ITRI's competition here
CLS vs BMI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BMI trades at $123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BMI's competition here
CLS vs BELFB Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BELFB trades at $252.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 59.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFB's competition here
CLS vs BELFA Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BELFA trades at $230.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFA's competition here
CLS vs BHE Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BHE trades at $68.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 102.21. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BHE's competition here
CLS vs ROG Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ROG trades at $129.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -38.61. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ROG's competition here
CLS vs NOVTU Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while NOVTU trades at $58.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVTU's competition here
CLS vs OUST Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OUST trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -26.37. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST's competition here
CLS vs CTS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while CTS trades at $56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CTS's competition here
CLS vs PENG Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while PENG trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PENG's competition here
CLS vs ALNT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ALNT trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ALNT's competition here
CLS vs BKSY Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BKSY trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BKSY's competition here
CLS vs DAKT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 973.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while DAKT trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAKT's competition here
CLS vs FARO Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FARO's competition here
CLS vs VPG Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 805.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while VPG trades at $57.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 151.41. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VPG's competition here
CLS vs OUST-WTA Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
CLS vs LPTH Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LPTH trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LPTH's competition here
CLS vs LYTS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LYTS trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LYTS's competition here
CLS vs SATL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 674.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SATL trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -34.28. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SATL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SATL's competition here
CLS vs KOPN Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 658.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while KOPN trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 370.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KOPN's competition here
CLS vs AMOT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMOT's competition here
CLS vs MLAB Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 541.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MLAB trades at $98.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 150.71. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MLAB's competition here
CLS vs OUST-WT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
CLS vs OPTX Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 354.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OPTX trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -191.60. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTX's competition here
CLS vs BKSY-WT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
CLS vs VLDR Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDR's competition here
CLS vs MEI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MEI trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MEI's competition here
CLS vs RELL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while RELL trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 53.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RELL's competition here
CLS vs SLNHP Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 207.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SLNHP trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNHP's competition here
CLS vs MVIS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MVIS trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MVIS's competition here
CLS vs MPTI Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MPTI trades at $63.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MPTI's competition here
CLS vs EMAN Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check EMAN's competition here
CLS vs SATLW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SATLW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SATLW's competition here
CLS vs KULR Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while KULR trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KULR's competition here
CLS vs WRAP Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while WRAP trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WRAP's competition here
CLS vs GNSS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while GNSS trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GNSS's competition here
CLS vs ODYS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ODYS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ODYS's competition here
CLS vs CPSH Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while CPSH trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CPSH's competition here
CLS vs SOTK Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SOTK trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SOTK's competition here
CLS vs OPTXW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OPTXW trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTXW's competition here
CLS vs MIND Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MIND trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 71.33. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MIND's competition here
CLS vs ELTK Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ELTK trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELTK's competition here
CLS vs UEIC Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while UEIC trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check UEIC's competition here
CLS vs DSWL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while DSWL trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DSWL's competition here
CLS vs LINK Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LINK trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LINK's competition here
CLS vs ACFN Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ACFN trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ACFN's competition here
CLS vs WATT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while WATT trades at $30.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WATT's competition here
CLS vs LGL Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LGL trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL's competition here
CLS vs NSYS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while NSYS trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -158.33. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NSYS's competition here
CLS vs LUNA Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while LUNA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -36.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LUNA's competition here
CLS vs SLNH Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SLNH trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNH's competition here
CLS vs ISNS Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ISNS's competition here
CLS vs REFR Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while REFR trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check REFR's competition here
CLS vs WBX Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while WBX trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WBX's competition here
CLS vs NEON Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while NEON trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NEON's competition here
CLS vs ELSE Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while ELSE trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 84.56. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELSE's competition here
CLS vs DAIO Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while DAIO trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAIO's competition here
CLS vs HOLO Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while HOLO trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check HOLO's competition here
CLS vs TMPOW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TMPOW's competition here
CLS vs SGMA Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SGMA's competition here
CLS vs VIAO Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VIAO's competition here
CLS vs KNW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KNW's competition here
CLS vs SELX Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SELX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SELX's competition here
CLS vs SVREW Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVREW's competition here
CLS vs MTEK Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MTEK trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MTEK's competition here
CLS vs GAUZ Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while GAUZ trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GAUZ's competition here
CLS vs OST Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OST's competition here
CLS vs SVRE Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while SVRE trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVRE's competition here
CLS vs BNSO Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BNSO's competition here
CLS vs MINDP Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MINDP's competition here
CLS vs MMAT Comparison April 2026
CLS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 47.2B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $410.64, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.14, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MMAT's competition here