Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CLS's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CLS and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | $312.35 | +0.81% | 35.9B | 44.50 | $7.02 | N/A |
| APH | $82.78 | +0.87% | 204B | 19.20 | $4.31 | +0.81% |
| GLW | $154.30 | +5.68% | 132.9B | 57.37 | $2.69 | +0.74% |
| KEYS | $327.21 | +1.42% | 55.9B | 37.74 | $8.67 | N/A |
| COHR | $281.86 | +6.60% | 55.2B | 58.01 | $4.86 | N/A |
| GRMN | $277.03 | -0.05% | 53.4B | 28.63 | $9.67 | +1.35% |
| FLEX | $109.51 | +1.50% | 40.5B | 33.08 | $3.31 | N/A |
| JBL | $310.57 | +3.73% | 32.1B | 25.52 | $11.99 | +0.10% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.28% |
| TDY | $610.65 | +0.46% | 28.3B | 26.71 | $22.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (NYSE: APH)
CLS vs APH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check APH's competition here
Corning Inc (NYSE: GLW)
CLS vs GLW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 132.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $154.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 57.37. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GLW's competition here
Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: KEYS)
CLS vs KEYS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $327.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 37.74. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KEYS's competition here
Coherent, Inc. (NYSE: COHR)
CLS vs COHR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $281.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 58.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check COHR's competition here
Garmin Ltd. (NYSE: GRMN)
CLS vs GRMN Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $277.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GRMN's competition here
Flex Ltd. (NASDAQ: FLEX)
CLS vs FLEX Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $109.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FLEX's competition here
Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL)
CLS vs JBL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $310.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check JBL's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVI)
CLS vs IIVI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IIVI's competition here
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: TDY)
CLS vs TDY Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $610.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TDY's competition here
MKS Inc. (NASDAQ: MKSI)
CLS vs MKSI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $260.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MKSI's competition here
Western Digital Corporation Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: WDCVV)
CLS vs WDCVV Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WDCVV's competition here
Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV)
CLS vs FTV Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while FTV trades at $56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FTV's competition here
Fabrinet (NYSE: FN)
CLS vs FN Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $407.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FN's competition here
Trimble Inc. (NASDAQ: TRMB)
CLS vs TRMB Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $59.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TRMB's competition here
TTM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTMI)
CLS vs TTMI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $125.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TTMI's competition here
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEIS)
CLS vs AEIS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $280.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AEIS's competition here
Littelfuse, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFUS)
CLS vs LFUS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $419.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LFUS's competition here
Sanmina Corporation (NASDAQ: SANM)
CLS vs SANM Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $198.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SANM's competition here
Cognex Corporation (NASDAQ: CGNX)
CLS vs CGNX Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CGNX's competition here
Vicor Corporation (NASDAQ: VICR)
CLS vs VICR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $188.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 63.06. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VICR's competition here
ESCO Technologies Inc. (NYSE: ESE)
CLS vs ESE Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $274.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ESE's competition here
Ralliant Corp (NYSE: RAL)
CLS vs RAL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RAL's competition here
Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ: PLXS)
CLS vs PLXS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $245.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PLXS's competition here
Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST)
CLS vs ST Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $43.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ST's competition here
Novanta Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVT)
CLS vs NOVT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $148.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVT's competition here
Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT)
CLS vs VNT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VNT's competition here
Itron, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITRI)
CLS vs ITRI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ITRI's competition here
Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ: OLED)
CLS vs OLED Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $82.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OLED's competition here
OSI Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSIS)
CLS vs OSIS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $204.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OSIS's competition here
Knowles Corporation (NYSE: KN)
CLS vs KN Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $35.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KN's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFA)
CLS vs BELFA Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $202.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFA's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFB)
CLS vs BELFB Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $243.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFB's competition here
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: BHE)
CLS vs BHE Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $72.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BHE's competition here
Rogers Corporation (NYSE: ROG)
CLS vs ROG Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ROG's competition here
Novanta Inc. Tangible Equity Units (NASDAQ: NOVTU)
CLS vs NOVTU Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $62.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVTU's competition here
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQL)
CLS vs PSQL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, PSQL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while PSQL trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas PSQL's P/E ratio is -124.18. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PSQL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to PSQL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PSQL's competition here
CTS Corporation (NYSE: CTS)
CLS vs CTS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $57.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CTS's competition here
Unusual Machines, Inc. (AMEX: UMAC)
CLS vs UMAC Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while UMAC trades at $23.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -148.62. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check UMAC's competition here
Daktronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: DAKT)
CLS vs DAKT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 934.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAKT's competition here
FARO Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: FARO)
CLS vs FARO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FARO's competition here
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE: VPG)
CLS vs VPG Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 838.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $63.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 142.99. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VPG's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WTA)
CLS vs OUST-WTA Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LPTH)
CLS vs LPTH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 607.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -22.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LPTH's competition here
Methode Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: MEI)
CLS vs MEI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MEI's competition here
Allied Motion Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOT)
CLS vs AMOT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMOT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WT)
CLS vs OUST-WT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNHP)
CLS vs SLNHP Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNHP's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTX)
CLS vs OPTX Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -69.58. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTX's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTXW)
CLS vs OPTXW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTXW's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDR)
CLS vs VLDR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDR's competition here
M-tron Industries, Inc. (AMEX: MPTI)
CLS vs MPTI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $74.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MPTI's competition here
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RELL)
CLS vs RELL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 55.90. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RELL's competition here
USBC, Inc. (AMEX: USBC)
CLS vs USBC Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 193.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check USBC's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNH)
CLS vs SLNH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNH's competition here
eMagin Corporation (AMEX: EMAN)
CLS vs EMAN Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check EMAN's competition here
Wrap Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: WRAP)
CLS vs WRAP Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WRAP's competition here
Interlink Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINK)
CLS vs LINK Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -31.47. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LINK's competition here
Wallbox N.V. (NYSE: WBX)
CLS vs WBX Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 77.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WBX's ROE of -13.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WBX's competition here
Odysight.ai Inc. (NASDAQ: ODYS)
CLS vs ODYS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ODYS's competition here
CPS Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CPSH)
CLS vs CPSH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while CPSH trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5471.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CPSH's competition here
Eltek Ltd. (NASDAQ: ELTK)
CLS vs ELTK Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELTK's competition here
Deswell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: DSWL)
CLS vs DSWL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DSWL's competition here
Acorn Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACFN)
CLS vs ACFN Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 57.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ACFN's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL)
CLS vs LGL Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 648.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND)
CLS vs MIND Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MIND's competition here
MicroVision, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVIS)
CLS vs MVIS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MVIS's competition here
Autoscope Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ISNS)
CLS vs ISNS Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ISNS's competition here
Data I/O Corporation (NASDAQ: DAIO)
CLS vs DAIO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAIO's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series A Right (NASDAQ: AMPGR)
CLS vs AMPGR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGR's competition here
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELSE)
CLS vs ELSE Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELSE's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPOW)
CLS vs TMPOW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TMPOW's competition here
Inno Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: INHD)
CLS vs INHD Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while INHD trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check INHD's competition here
SigmaTron International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGMA)
CLS vs SGMA Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SGMA's competition here
VIA optronics AG (NYSE: VIAO)
CLS vs VIAO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VIAO's competition here
Know Labs, Inc. (AMEX: KNW)
CLS vs KNW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KNW's competition here
Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON)
CLS vs NEON Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NEON's competition here
Wetouch Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: WETH)
CLS vs WETH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WETH's competition here
Research Frontiers Incorporated (NASDAQ: REFR)
CLS vs REFR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check REFR's competition here
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OST)
CLS vs OST Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OST's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVREW)
CLS vs SVREW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVREW's competition here
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GAUZ)
CLS vs GAUZ Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GAUZ's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVRE)
CLS vs SVRE Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVRE's competition here
Bonso Electronics International Inc. (NASDAQ: BNSO)
CLS vs BNSO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BNSO's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINDP)
CLS vs MINDP Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MINDP's competition here
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT)
CLS vs MMAT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MMAT's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series B Right (NASDAQ: AMPGZ)
CLS vs AMPGZ Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
Focus Universal Inc. (NASDAQ: FCUV)
CLS vs FCUV Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FCUV's competition here
Integrated Media Technology Limited (NASDAQ: IMTE)
CLS vs IMTE Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IMTE's competition here
SOBR Safe, Inc. (NASDAQ: SOBR)
CLS vs SOBR Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 628.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SOBR's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL-WT)
CLS vs LGL-WT Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL-WT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTZ)
CLS vs OUSTZ Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUSTZ's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTW)
CLS vs OUSTW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUSTW's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDRW)
CLS vs VLDRW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDRW's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVIP)
CLS vs IIVIP Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, IIVIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while IIVIP trades at $187.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas IIVIP's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IIVIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to IIVIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IIVIP's competition here
MOCON, Inc. (NASDAQ: MOCO)
CLS vs MOCO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, MOCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while MOCO trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas MOCO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MOCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MOCO's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPO)
CLS vs TMPO Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, TMPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while TMPO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TMPO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TMPO's competition here
Hutchinson Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: HTCH)
CLS vs HTCH Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while HTCH trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check HTCH's competition here
Rofin Sinar Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: RSTI)
CLS vs RSTI Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, RSTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while RSTI trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas RSTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RSTI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RSTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RSTI's competition here
Pasqal Holding S.A. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: PSQLW)
CLS vs PSQLW Comparison September 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 35.9B. In comparison, PSQLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $312.35 on the NYSE, while PSQLW trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.50, whereas PSQLW's P/E ratio is -28.39. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PSQLW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to PSQLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PSQLW's competition here