Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $169.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check APH's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $165.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 61.59. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GLW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $379.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check COHR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $310.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GRMN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $340.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KEYS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $121.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FLEX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $341.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check JBL's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $691.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TDY's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IIVI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $304.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MKSI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $562.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WDCVV's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $137.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TTMI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $59.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TRMB's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $325.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AEIS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $456.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LFUS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $66.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CGNX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $202.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SANM's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $221.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 73.98. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VICR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $305.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ESE's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while RIOT trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RIOT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $67.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RAL's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $270.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PLXS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $46.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ST's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $166.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $103.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ITRI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $91.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OLED's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $236.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OSIS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $291.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFB's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $233.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFA's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $39.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while PENG trades at $58.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PENG's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $82.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BHE's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while INFQ trades at $11.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -56.74. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check INFQ's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $69.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVTU's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $134.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ROG's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $66.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CTS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $21.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAKT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 912.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $68.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 155.70. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VPG's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FARO's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 820M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $13.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -76.82. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LPTH's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SATLW trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -34.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SATLW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 590.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MEI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMOT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $11.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNHP's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTXW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $88.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MPTI's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $7.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -71.60. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 66.65. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RELL's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNH's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check EMAN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check USBC's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WRAP's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while WATT trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WATT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LINK's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MVIS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ODYS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while YIBO trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check YIBO's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELTK's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DSWL's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ACFN's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MIND's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MCRP trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MCRP's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while NSYS trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NSYS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $7.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 626.18. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WBX's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WBX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ISNS's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAIO's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELSE's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while AVX trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AVX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TMPOW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while HOLOW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check HOLOW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SGMA's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VIAO's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check REFR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NEON's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KNW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MTEKW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MTEKW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WETH's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OST's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVRE's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVREW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GAUZ's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BNSO's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MINDP's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MMAT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IMTE's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FCUV's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 849.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SOBR's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 833.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while EXYNW trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check EXYNW's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, GMEX has a market cap of 196.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while GMEX trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas GMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GMEX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GMEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GMEX's competition here

Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 36.6B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $317.83 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 45.30, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUSTZ's competition here