Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CLS's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CLS and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | $269.01 | -11.69% | 33.9B | 38.33 | $7.02 | N/A |
| APH | $73.07 | -7.74% | 180.2B | 16.95 | $4.31 | +0.69% |
| GLW | $123.99 | -8.10% | 106.8B | 46.07 | $2.69 | +0.91% |
| GRMN | $295.40 | +1.47% | 57B | 30.56 | $9.67 | +1.32% |
| KEYS | $311.52 | -8.74% | 53B | 35.93 | $8.67 | N/A |
| COHR | $207.82 | -12.51% | 40.9B | 42.75 | $4.86 | N/A |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.28% |
| TDY | $620.47 | -1.53% | 28.7B | 27.11 | $22.87 | N/A |
| FLEX | $76.69 | -11.08% | 28.3B | 23.16 | $3.31 | N/A |
| JBL | $267.41 | -4.83% | 28B | 22.29 | $11.99 | +0.12% |
Stock Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (NYSE: APH)
CLS vs APH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $73.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check APH's competition here
Corning Inc (NYSE: GLW)
CLS vs GLW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $123.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GLW's competition here
Garmin Ltd. (NYSE: GRMN)
CLS vs GRMN Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $295.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GRMN's competition here
Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: KEYS)
CLS vs KEYS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $311.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KEYS's competition here
Coherent, Inc. (NYSE: COHR)
CLS vs COHR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $207.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 42.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check COHR's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVI)
CLS vs IIVI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IIVI's competition here
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: TDY)
CLS vs TDY Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $620.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TDY's competition here
Flex Ltd. (NASDAQ: FLEX)
CLS vs FLEX Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $76.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FLEX's competition here
Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL)
CLS vs JBL Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $267.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check JBL's competition here
Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV)
CLS vs FTV Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FTV trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FTV's competition here
Western Digital Corporation Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: WDCVV)
CLS vs WDCVV Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WDCVV's competition here
Trimble Inc. (NASDAQ: TRMB)
CLS vs TRMB Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TRMB's competition here
MKS Inc. (NASDAQ: MKSI)
CLS vs MKSI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $196.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MKSI's competition here
Fabrinet (NYSE: FN)
CLS vs FN Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FN trades at $317.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FN's competition here
Cognex Corporation (NASDAQ: CGNX)
CLS vs CGNX Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CGNX's competition here
Littelfuse, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFUS)
CLS vs LFUS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $350.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LFUS's competition here
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEIS)
CLS vs AEIS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $216.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AEIS's competition here
Vicor Corporation (NASDAQ: VICR)
CLS vs VICR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $179.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 60.20. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VICR's competition here
Sanmina Corporation (NASDAQ: SANM)
CLS vs SANM Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $154.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SANM's competition here
TTM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTMI)
CLS vs TTMI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $73.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TTMI's competition here
Ralliant Corp (NYSE: RAL)
CLS vs RAL Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RAL's competition here
ESCO Technologies Inc. (NYSE: ESE)
CLS vs ESE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $232.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ESE's competition here
Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST)
CLS vs ST Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ST's competition here
Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ: PLXS)
CLS vs PLXS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $220.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check PLXS's competition here
Novanta Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVT)
CLS vs NOVT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $136.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVT's competition here
Vontier Corporation (NYSE: VNT)
CLS vs VNT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $34.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VNT's competition here
Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ: OLED)
CLS vs OLED Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $87.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OLED's competition here
Itron, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITRI)
CLS vs ITRI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $88.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ITRI's competition here
OSI Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSIS)
CLS vs OSIS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $200.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OSIS's competition here
Knowles Corporation (NYSE: KN)
CLS vs KN Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KN's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFB)
CLS vs BELFB Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $199.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFB's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFA)
CLS vs BELFA Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $161.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BELFA's competition here
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: BHE)
CLS vs BHE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $66.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BHE's competition here
Rogers Corporation (NYSE: ROG)
CLS vs ROG Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $128.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ROG's competition here
Novanta Inc. Tangible Equity Units (NASDAQ: NOVTU)
CLS vs NOVTU Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $58.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NOVTU's competition here
CTS Corporation (NYSE: CTS)
CLS vs CTS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CTS's competition here
Daktronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: DAKT)
CLS vs DAKT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAKT's competition here
FARO Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: FARO)
CLS vs FARO Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FARO's competition here
Unusual Machines, Inc. (AMEX: UMAC)
CLS vs UMAC Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 813.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while UMAC trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -101.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check UMAC's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WTA)
CLS vs OUST-WTA Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE: VPG)
CLS vs VPG Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 701.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 119.65. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VPG's competition here
Allied Motion Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOT)
CLS vs AMOT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMOT's competition here
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LPTH)
CLS vs LPTH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LPTH's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WT)
CLS vs OUST-WT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
Methode Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: MEI)
CLS vs MEI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 451.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MEI's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNHP)
CLS vs SLNHP Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 304.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNHP's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDR)
CLS vs VLDR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDR's competition here
M-tron Industries, Inc. (AMEX: MPTI)
CLS vs MPTI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 288.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $65.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MPTI's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTX)
CLS vs OPTX Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -61.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTX's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTXW)
CLS vs OPTXW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OPTXW's competition here
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RELL)
CLS vs RELL Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RELL's competition here
eMagin Corporation (AMEX: EMAN)
CLS vs EMAN Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check EMAN's competition here
USBC, Inc. (AMEX: USBC)
CLS vs USBC Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check USBC's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNH)
CLS vs SLNH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SLNH's competition here
Wrap Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: WRAP)
CLS vs WRAP Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WRAP's competition here
CPS Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: CPSH)
CLS vs CPSH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while CPSH trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5028.57. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check CPSH's competition here
Wallbox N.V. (NYSE: WBX)
CLS vs WBX Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WBX's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WBX's competition here
Interlink Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINK)
CLS vs LINK Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -23.45. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LINK's competition here
Arbe Robotics Ltd. (NASDAQ: ARBE)
CLS vs ARBE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ARBE trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ARBE's competition here
Deswell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: DSWL)
CLS vs DSWL Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DSWL's competition here
Eltek Ltd. (NASDAQ: ELTK)
CLS vs ELTK Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELTK's competition here
Acorn Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACFN)
CLS vs ACFN Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 53.73. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ACFN's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL)
CLS vs LGL Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 574.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND)
CLS vs MIND Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MIND's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MIND's competition here
Odysight.ai Inc. (NASDAQ: ODYS)
CLS vs ODYS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ODYS's competition here
Autoscope Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ISNS)
CLS vs ISNS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ISNS's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series A Right (NASDAQ: AMPGR)
CLS vs AMPGR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGR's competition here
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELSE)
CLS vs ELSE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ELSE's competition here
MicroVision, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVIS)
CLS vs MVIS Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 26.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MVIS's competition here
Data I/O Corporation (NASDAQ: DAIO)
CLS vs DAIO Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check DAIO's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPOW)
CLS vs TMPOW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check TMPOW's competition here
SigmaTron International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGMA)
CLS vs SGMA Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SGMA's competition here
VIA optronics AG (NYSE: VIAO)
CLS vs VIAO Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VIAO's competition here
Know Labs, Inc. (AMEX: KNW)
CLS vs KNW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check KNW's competition here
Research Frontiers Incorporated (NASDAQ: REFR)
CLS vs REFR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check REFR's competition here
Inno Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: INHD)
CLS vs INHD Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while INHD trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check INHD's competition here
Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON)
CLS vs NEON Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check NEON's competition here
Wetouch Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: WETH)
CLS vs WETH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check WETH's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVREW)
CLS vs SVREW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVREW's competition here
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OST)
CLS vs OST Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OST's competition here
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GAUZ)
CLS vs GAUZ Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of +5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check GAUZ's competition here
Bonso Electronics International Inc. (NASDAQ: BNSO)
CLS vs BNSO Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check BNSO's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINDP)
CLS vs MINDP Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MINDP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MINDP's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVRE)
CLS vs SVRE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SVRE's competition here
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT)
CLS vs MMAT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MMAT's competition here
Focus Universal Inc. (NASDAQ: FCUV)
CLS vs FCUV Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FCUV's competition here
Arbe Robotics Ltd. (NASDAQ: ARBEW)
CLS vs ARBEW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, ARBEW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while ARBEW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas ARBEW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to ARBEW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to ARBEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check ARBEW's competition here
Integrated Media Technology Limited (NASDAQ: IMTE)
CLS vs IMTE Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check IMTE's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series B Right (NASDAQ: AMPGZ)
CLS vs AMPGZ Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
SOBR Safe, Inc. (NASDAQ: SOBR)
CLS vs SOBR Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 298K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check SOBR's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL-WT)
CLS vs LGL-WT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check LGL-WT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTZ)
CLS vs OUSTZ Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUSTZ's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTW)
CLS vs OUSTW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check OUSTW's competition here
MOCON, Inc. (NASDAQ: MOCO)
CLS vs MOCO Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, MOCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while MOCO trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas MOCO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to MOCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to MOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check MOCO's competition here
FEI Co. (NASDAQ: FEIC)
CLS vs FEIC Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, FEIC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while FEIC trades at $106.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas FEIC's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to FEIC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to FEIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check FEIC's competition here
Hutchinson Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: HTCH)
CLS vs HTCH Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while HTCH trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check HTCH's competition here
Quanergy Systems, Inc. (NYSE: QNGY-WT)
CLS vs QNGY-WT Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, QNGY-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while QNGY-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas QNGY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to QNGY-WT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to QNGY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check QNGY-WT's competition here
Rofin Sinar Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: RSTI)
CLS vs RSTI Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, RSTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while RSTI trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas RSTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to RSTI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is more volatile compared to RSTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check RSTI's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDRW)
CLS vs VLDRW Comparison October 2026
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLS stands at 33.9B. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS is priced at $269.01 on the NYSE, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLS currently has a P/E ratio of 38.33, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLS's ROE is +0.51%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.Check VLDRW's competition here