Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $81.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check APH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 143B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $169.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GLW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $306.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check COHR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $330.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KEYS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $274.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GRMN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $113.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FLEX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while CLS trades at $341.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CLS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $314.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check JBL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IIVI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $600.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TDY's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $266.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MKSI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WDCVV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while FTV trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FTV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $57.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TRMB's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $127.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TTMI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $288.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AEIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $204.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SANM's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $423.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LFUS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $62.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CGNX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $190.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 64.66. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VICR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $66.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to RAL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RAL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $269.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ESE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $247.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PLXS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $42.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ST's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $147.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $32.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VNT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $95.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ITRI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $80.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OLED's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $201.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OSIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $35.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $206.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $247.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFB's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $74.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BHE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $129.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ROG's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $61.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVTU's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PSQL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while PSQL trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas PSQL's P/E ratio is -125.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSQL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to PSQL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PSQL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $56.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CTS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while UMAC trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -162.44. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check UMAC's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 949.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAKT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 862.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 147.18. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VPG's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FARO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 675M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LPTH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMOT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 499.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MEI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 368.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $12.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNHP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -71.32. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTXW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 270.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $77.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MPTI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $17.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is similarly volatile compared to RELL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RELL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check USBC's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check EMAN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WRAP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -32.11. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LINK's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WBX's ROE of -13.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WBX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while CPSH trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5657.14. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CPSH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ODYS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELTK's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $19.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 59.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ACFN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DSWL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $7.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 627.27. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MVIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MIND's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ISNS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAIO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELSE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPOW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while INHD trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check INHD's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SGMA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VIAO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KNW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NEON's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check REFR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WETH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OST's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVREW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GAUZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVRE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BNSO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MINDP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MMAT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IMTE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FCUV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 675.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SOBR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUSTZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUSTW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDRW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, IIVIP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while IIVIP trades at $187.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas IIVIP's P/E ratio is 75.98. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IIVIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to IIVIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IIVIP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, MOCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while MOCO trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MOCO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MOCO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, TMPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while TMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMPO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while HTCH trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check HTCH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, RSTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while RSTI trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas RSTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSTI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to RSTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RSTI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 14.9B. In comparison, PSQLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $421.78 on the NYSE, while PSQLW trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas PSQLW's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSQLW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to PSQLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PSQLW's competition here