Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while APH trades at $74.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check APH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while GLW trades at $106.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GLW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while GRMN trades at $285.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GRMN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while KEYS trades at $272.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 31.36. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KEYS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while COHR trades at $192.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check COHR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IIVI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while TDY trades at $618.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TDY's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while CLS trades at $206.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CLS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while FLEX trades at $69.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FLEX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while JBL trades at $239.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check JBL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while FTV trades at $65.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FTV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WDCVV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MKSI trades at $192.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MKSI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while TRMB trades at $54.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TRMB's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while LFUS trades at $355.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LFUS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while CGNX trades at $47.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CGNX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while AEIS trades at $197.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AEIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while RAL trades at $67.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RAL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SANM trades at $134.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SANM's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while TTMI trades at $66.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TTMI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VICR trades at $146.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VICR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ESE trades at $230.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ESE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ST trades at $39.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ST's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VNT trades at $42.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VNT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while PLXS trades at $192.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check PLXS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while NOVT trades at $135.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ITRI trades at $98.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ITRI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OLED trades at $88.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OLED's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VSH trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 80.29. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VSH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OSIS trades at $196.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OSIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while KN trades at $31.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while BELFB trades at $206.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFB's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while BELFA trades at $164.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BELFA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while NOVTU trades at $57.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NOVTU's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ROG trades at $121.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ROG's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while BHE trades at $60.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BHE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while CTS trades at $57.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CTS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 933.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while DAKT trades at $19.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAKT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FARO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 615M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while UMAC trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -74.28. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check UMAC's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMOT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 542.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VPG trades at $44.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 100.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VPG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VPG's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 494.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while LPTH trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LPTH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MEI trades at $10.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -10.65. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MEI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 312.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SLNHP trades at $10.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNHP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 262.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MPTI trades at $60.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MPTI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while RELL trades at $17.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check RELL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OPTXW trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTXW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 194.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OPTX trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -44.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OPTX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check EMAN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 145M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while USBC trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to USBC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check USBC's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SLNH trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SLNH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while CPSH trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 5528.57. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check CPSH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while WRAP trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WRAP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while WBX trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBX's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WBX's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ARBE trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ARBE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while LINK trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LINK's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while DSWL trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DSWL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ELTK trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELTK's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while LGL trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 574.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ACFN trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ACFN's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ISNS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 30.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MIND trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIND's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MIND's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ODYS trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ODYS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ELSE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MVIS trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MVIS's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while DAIO trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check DAIO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPOW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SGMA's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VIAO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check KNW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while INHD trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check INHD's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while REFR trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REFR's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check REFR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while NEON trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check NEON's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while WETH trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check WETH's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OST's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVREW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while GAUZ trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of +5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check GAUZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MSAI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MSAI trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MSAI's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSAI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MSAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MSAI's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check BNSO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MINDP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MINDP's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MMAT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SVRE trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SVRE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while FCUV trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check FCUV's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ARBEW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while ARBEW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas ARBEW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARBEW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to ARBEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check ARBEW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while IMTE trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check IMTE's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MSAIW has a market cap of 633.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while MSAIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas MSAIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSAIW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to MSAIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check MSAIW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 298K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while SOBR trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check SOBR's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 261.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while AMPGZ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUSTZ's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check OUSTW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VLDRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while VLDRW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas VLDRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLDRW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to VLDRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check VLDRW's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TMPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while TMPO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas TMPO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMPO's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is less volatile compared to TMPO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check TMPO's competition here

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FN stands at 11.7B. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FN is priced at $327.13 on the NYSE, while HTCH trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FN currently has a P/E ratio of 23.20, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, FN's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FN is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FN.Check HTCH's competition here