
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MMAT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MMAT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAT | $0.53 | -17.84% | 3.5M | -0.01 | -$65.82 | N/A |
| APH | $169.18 | -0.84% | 208.6B | 44.87 | $3.77 | +0.54% |
| GLW | $165.68 | +5.73% | 142.7B | 61.59 | $2.69 | +0.67% |
| COHR | $379.13 | +13.44% | 74.1B | 77.94 | $4.86 | N/A |
| GRMN | $310.89 | +2.99% | 60B | 32.15 | $9.67 | +1.21% |
| KEYS | $340.97 | +1.19% | 58.3B | 39.32 | $8.67 | N/A |
| FLEX | $121.35 | -1.06% | 44.8B | 36.66 | $3.31 | N/A |
| CLS | $317.83 | +1.05% | 36.6B | 45.30 | $7.02 | N/A |
| JBL | $341.22 | -1.00% | 35.8B | 28.46 | $11.99 | +0.09% |
| TDY | $691.30 | +0.55% | 32B | 30.22 | $22.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (NYSE: APH)
MMAT vs APH Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while APH trades at $169.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check APH's competition here
Corning Inc (NYSE: GLW)
MMAT vs GLW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while GLW trades at $165.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 61.59. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GLW's competition here
Coherent, Inc. (NYSE: COHR)
MMAT vs COHR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while COHR trades at $379.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check COHR's competition here
Garmin Ltd. (NYSE: GRMN)
MMAT vs GRMN Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while GRMN trades at $310.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GRMN's competition here
Keysight Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: KEYS)
MMAT vs KEYS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while KEYS trades at $340.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KEYS's competition here
Flex Ltd. (NASDAQ: FLEX)
MMAT vs FLEX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while FLEX trades at $121.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FLEX's competition here
Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS)
MMAT vs CLS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while CLS trades at $317.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.30. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CLS's competition here
Jabil Inc. (NYSE: JBL)
MMAT vs JBL Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while JBL trades at $341.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check JBL's competition here
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: TDY)
MMAT vs TDY Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while TDY trades at $691.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TDY's competition here
II-VI Incorporated (NASDAQ: IIVI)
MMAT vs IIVI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check IIVI's competition here
MKS Inc. (NASDAQ: MKSI)
MMAT vs MKSI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MKSI trades at $304.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MKSI's competition here
Fabrinet (NYSE: FN)
MMAT vs FN Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while FN trades at $562.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FN's competition here
Western Digital Corporation Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued (NASDAQ: WDCVV)
MMAT vs WDCVV Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WDCVV's competition here
TTM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTMI)
MMAT vs TTMI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while TTMI trades at $137.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TTMI's competition here
Trimble Inc. (NASDAQ: TRMB)
MMAT vs TRMB Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while TRMB trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TRMB's competition here
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEIS)
MMAT vs AEIS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while AEIS trades at $325.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AEIS's competition here
Littelfuse, Inc. (NASDAQ: LFUS)
MMAT vs LFUS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while LFUS trades at $456.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LFUS's competition here
Cognex Corporation (NASDAQ: CGNX)
MMAT vs CGNX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while CGNX trades at $66.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CGNX's competition here
Sanmina Corporation (NASDAQ: SANM)
MMAT vs SANM Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SANM trades at $202.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SANM's competition here
Vicor Corporation (NASDAQ: VICR)
MMAT vs VICR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while VICR trades at $221.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 73.98. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VICR's competition here
ESCO Technologies Inc. (NYSE: ESE)
MMAT vs ESE Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ESE trades at $305.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ESE's competition here
Riot Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIOT)
MMAT vs RIOT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while RIOT trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check RIOT's competition here
Ralliant Corp (NYSE: RAL)
MMAT vs RAL Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while RAL trades at $67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check RAL's competition here
Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ: PLXS)
MMAT vs PLXS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while PLXS trades at $270.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check PLXS's competition here
Sensata Technologies Holding plc (NYSE: ST)
MMAT vs ST Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ST trades at $46.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ST's competition here
Novanta Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVT)
MMAT vs NOVT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while NOVT trades at $166.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NOVT's competition here
Itron, Inc. (NASDAQ: ITRI)
MMAT vs ITRI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ITRI trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ITRI's competition here
Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ: OLED)
MMAT vs OLED Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OLED trades at $91.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OLED's competition here
OSI Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: OSIS)
MMAT vs OSIS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OSIS trades at $236.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OSIS's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFB)
MMAT vs BELFB Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while BELFB trades at $291.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BELFB's competition here
Bel Fuse Inc. (NASDAQ: BELFA)
MMAT vs BELFA Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while BELFA trades at $233.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BELFA's competition here
Knowles Corporation (NYSE: KN)
MMAT vs KN Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while KN trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KN's competition here
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENG)
MMAT vs PENG Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $58.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check PENG's competition here
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: BHE)
MMAT vs BHE Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while BHE trades at $82.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BHE's competition here
Infleqtion Inc (NYSE: INFQ)
MMAT vs INFQ Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while INFQ trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -56.74. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check INFQ's competition here
Novanta Inc. Tangible Equity Units (NASDAQ: NOVTU)
MMAT vs NOVTU Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while NOVTU trades at $69.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NOVTU's competition here
Rogers Corporation (NYSE: ROG)
MMAT vs ROG Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ROG trades at $134.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ROG's competition here
CTS Corporation (NYSE: CTS)
MMAT vs CTS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while CTS trades at $66.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check CTS's competition here
Daktronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: DAKT)
MMAT vs DAKT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while DAKT trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DAKT's competition here
Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (NYSE: VPG)
MMAT vs VPG Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 912.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while VPG trades at $68.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 155.70. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VPG's competition here
FARO Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: FARO)
MMAT vs FARO Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FARO's competition here
LightPath Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LPTH)
MMAT vs LPTH Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 820M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while LPTH trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -76.82. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LPTH's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WTA)
MMAT vs OUST-WTA Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
Satellogic Inc. (NASDAQ: SATLW)
MMAT vs SATLW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SATLW trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SATLW's ROE of -34.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SATLW's competition here
Methode Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: MEI)
MMAT vs MEI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 590.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MEI trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MEI's competition here
Allied Motion Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: AMOT)
MMAT vs AMOT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AMOT's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NYSE: OUST-WT)
MMAT vs OUST-WT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUST-WT's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNHP)
MMAT vs SLNHP Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 340.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SLNHP trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SLNHP's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTXW)
MMAT vs OPTXW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OPTXW trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OPTXW's competition here
M-tron Industries, Inc. (AMEX: MPTI)
MMAT vs MPTI Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MPTI trades at $88.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MPTI's competition here
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: OPTX)
MMAT vs OPTX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 313.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OPTX trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -71.60. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OPTX's competition here
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RELL)
MMAT vs RELL Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while RELL trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 66.65. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check RELL's competition here
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. (NASDAQ: VLDR)
MMAT vs VLDR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VLDR's competition here
Soluna Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNH)
MMAT vs SLNH Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SLNH trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SLNH's competition here
eMagin Corporation (AMEX: EMAN)
MMAT vs EMAN Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check EMAN's competition here
USBC, Inc. (AMEX: USBC)
MMAT vs USBC Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while USBC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check USBC's competition here
Wrap Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: WRAP)
MMAT vs WRAP Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while WRAP trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WRAP's competition here
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT)
MMAT vs WATT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while WATT trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WATT's competition here
Interlink Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINK)
MMAT vs LINK Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while LINK trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -29.72. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LINK's competition here
MicroVision, Inc. (NASDAQ: MVIS)
MMAT vs MVIS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MVIS trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MVIS's competition here
Odysight.ai Inc. (NASDAQ: ODYS)
MMAT vs ODYS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ODYS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ODYS's competition here
Planet Image International Limited Class A (NASDAQ: YIBO)
MMAT vs YIBO Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while YIBO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check YIBO's competition here
Eltek Ltd. (NASDAQ: ELTK)
MMAT vs ELTK Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ELTK trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ELTK's competition here
Deswell Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: DSWL)
MMAT vs DSWL Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while DSWL trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DSWL's competition here
Acorn Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACFN)
MMAT vs ACFN Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ACFN trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ACFN's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND)
MMAT vs MIND Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MIND trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MIND's competition here
Micropolis AI Robotics (AMEX: MCRP)
MMAT vs MCRP Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MCRP has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MCRP trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCRP's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MCRP's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MCRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MCRP's competition here
Nortech Systems Incorporated (NASDAQ: NSYS)
MMAT vs NSYS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while NSYS trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NSYS's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL)
MMAT vs LGL Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while LGL trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 626.18. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LGL's competition here
Wallbox N.V. (NYSE: WBX)
MMAT vs WBX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while WBX trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WBX's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WBX's competition here
Autoscope Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ISNS)
MMAT vs ISNS Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ISNS's competition here
Data I/O Corporation (NASDAQ: DAIO)
MMAT vs DAIO Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while DAIO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check DAIO's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series A Right (NASDAQ: AMPGR)
MMAT vs AMPGR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AMPGR's competition here
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELSE)
MMAT vs ELSE Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while ELSE trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check ELSE's competition here
Avax One Technology Ltd (NASDAQ: AVX)
MMAT vs AVX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while AVX trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AVX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to AVX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AVX's competition here
Tempo Automation Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMPOW)
MMAT vs TMPOW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check TMPOW's competition here
Amplitech Group, Inc. Series B Right (NASDAQ: AMPGZ)
MMAT vs AMPGZ Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGZ trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check AMPGZ's competition here
MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (NASDAQ: HOLOW)
MMAT vs HOLOW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while HOLOW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check HOLOW's competition here
SigmaTron International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGMA)
MMAT vs SGMA Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SGMA's competition here
VIA optronics AG (NYSE: VIAO)
MMAT vs VIAO Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check VIAO's competition here
Research Frontiers Incorporated (NASDAQ: REFR)
MMAT vs REFR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while REFR trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check REFR's competition here
Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON)
MMAT vs NEON Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while NEON trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check NEON's competition here
Know Labs, Inc. (AMEX: KNW)
MMAT vs KNW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check KNW's competition here
Maris-Tech Ltd. (NASDAQ: MTEKW)
MMAT vs MTEKW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MTEKW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MTEKW's competition here
Wetouch Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: WETH)
MMAT vs WETH Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while WETH trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check WETH's competition here
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: OST)
MMAT vs OST Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OST's competition here
BlackSky Technology Inc. WT (NYSE: BKSY-WT)
MMAT vs BKSY-WT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVRE)
MMAT vs SVRE Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SVRE trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SVRE's competition here
SaverOne 2014 Ltd (NASDAQ: SVREW)
MMAT vs SVREW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SVREW's competition here
Gauzy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: GAUZ)
MMAT vs GAUZ Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while GAUZ trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GAUZ's competition here
Bonso Electronics International Inc. (NASDAQ: BNSO)
MMAT vs BNSO Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check BNSO's competition here
MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MINDP)
MMAT vs MINDP Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check MINDP's competition here
Integrated Media Technology Limited (NASDAQ: IMTE)
MMAT vs IMTE Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while IMTE trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check IMTE's competition here
Focus Universal Inc. (NASDAQ: FCUV)
MMAT vs FCUV Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while FCUV trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check FCUV's competition here
SOBR Safe, Inc. (NASDAQ: SOBR)
MMAT vs SOBR Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 849.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while SOBR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check SOBR's competition here
Exyn Technologies, Inc. Warrant (NASDAQ: EXYNW)
MMAT vs EXYNW Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 833.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while EXYNW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check EXYNW's competition here
The LGL Group, Inc. (AMEX: LGL-WT)
MMAT vs LGL-WT Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check LGL-WT's competition here
GMEX Robotics Corporation (NASDAQ: GMEX)
MMAT vs GMEX Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, GMEX has a market cap of 196.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while GMEX trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GMEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to GMEX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is more volatile compared to GMEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check GMEX's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUSTZ)
MMAT vs OUSTZ Comparison August 2026
Meta Materials Inc. (NASDAQ: MMAT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMAT stands at 3.5M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MMAT is priced at $0.53 on the NASDAQ, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMAT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MMAT's ROE is -1.99%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMAT is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMAT.Check OUSTZ's competition here