Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 199.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while APH trades at $79.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check APH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while GLW trades at $112.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check GLW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while GRMN trades at $288.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check GRMN's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while KEYS trades at $291.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check KEYS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while COHR trades at $214.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check COHR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while IIVI trades at $227.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check IIVI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while TDY trades at $646.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check TDY's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while CLS trades at $223.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check CLS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while FLEX trades at $76.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check FLEX's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while JBL trades at $249.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check JBL's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while FTV trades at $67.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check FTV's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check WDCVV's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MKSI trades at $213.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MKSI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while TRMB trades at $54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TRMB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check TRMB's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while FN trades at $348.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check FN's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while LFUS trades at $383.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check LFUS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while AEIS trades at $221.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check AEIS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while CGNX trades at $50.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check CGNX's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SANM trades at $155.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SANM's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while RAL trades at $69.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check RAL's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while TTMI trades at $72.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check TTMI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VICR trades at $161.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VICR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ESE trades at $238.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ESE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ST trades at $40.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ST's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VNT trades at $43.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VNT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while PLXS trades at $205.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check PLXS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while NOVT trades at $123.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check NOVT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ITRI trades at $99.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ITRI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OLED trades at $90.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OLED's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $26.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 92.38. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VSH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OSIS trades at $197.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OSIS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while KN trades at $32.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check KN's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while BELFB trades at $223.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check BELFB's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while BELFA trades at $176.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check BELFA's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ROG trades at $128.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 44.56. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ROG's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while BHE trades at $63.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check BHE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while NOVTU trades at $53.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check NOVTU's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while CTS trades at $61.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check CTS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 952.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while DAKT trades at $19.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check DAKT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while FARO trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check FARO's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OUST-WTA's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, UMAC has a market cap of 654.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while UMAC trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas UMAC's P/E ratio is -78.75. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to UMAC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to UMAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check UMAC's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 606.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VPG trades at $49.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 112.02. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VPG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VPG's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 560M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while LPTH trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -18.58. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check LPTH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while AMOT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check AMOT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OUST-WT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 422.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MEI trades at $11.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MEI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VLDR trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VLDR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 298.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SLNHP trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SLNHP's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MPTI trades at $64.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MPTI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while RELL trades at $19.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check RELL's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OPTXW trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OPTXW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OPTX trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OPTX's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while EMAN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check EMAN's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while USBC trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to USBC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check USBC's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while CPSH trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 6228.57. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check CPSH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SLNH trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SLNH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while WRAP trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check WRAP's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ARBE trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ARBE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while WBX trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WBX's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check WBX's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while LINK trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check LINK's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 47.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while DSWL trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check DSWL's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ELTK trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ELTK's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MVIS trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MVIS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while LGL trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 593.94. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LGL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check LGL's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ACFN trades at $15.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ACFN's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ISNS trades at $6.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ISNS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ODYS trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ODYS's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MIND trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MIND's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MIND's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check AMPGR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ELSE trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.75. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ELSE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while DAIO trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check DAIO's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +6.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check TMPOW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SGMA trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SGMA's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while VIAO trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check VIAO's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while KNW trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to KNW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check KNW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while REFR trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to REFR's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check REFR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while INHD trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check INHD's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while WETH trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.14. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check WETH's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OST trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OST's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SVREW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SVREW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while GAUZ trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of +5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check GAUZ's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MSAI has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MSAI trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MSAI's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MSAI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MSAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MSAI's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while BNSO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check BNSO's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MINDP trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MINDP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MINDP's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MMAT trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MMAT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while FCUV trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check FCUV's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SVRE trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SVRE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, ARBEW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while ARBEW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas ARBEW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to ARBEW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to ARBEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check ARBEW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while IMTE trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check IMTE's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MSAIW has a market cap of 633.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MSAIW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MSAIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MSAIW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to MSAIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MSAIW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 461.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while AMPGZ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check AMPGZ's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 298K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while SOBR trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check SOBR's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check LGL-WT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OUSTZ's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check OUSTW's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, MOCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while MOCO trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas MOCO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to MOCO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to MOCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check MOCO's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, QNGY-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while QNGY-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas QNGY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to QNGY-WT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is less volatile compared to QNGY-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check QNGY-WT's competition here

Neonode Inc. (NASDAQ: NEON) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NEON stands at 11.6M. In comparison, HTCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NEON is priced at $0.69 on the NASDAQ, while HTCH trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NEON currently has a P/E ratio of -1.58, whereas HTCH's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, NEON's ROE is +0.34%, compared to HTCH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NEON is more volatile compared to HTCH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NEON.Check HTCH's competition here