MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HOLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLO | $1.51 | +3.42% | 19.9M | -0.02 | -$91.22 | N/A |
| VRSK | $182.18 | +2.90% | 23.9B | 25.16 | $7.24 | +1.04% |
| CART | $47.46 | +1.41% | 11.2B | 23.50 | $2.02 | N/A |
| NTSK | $10.29 | +4.15% | 4.2B | -11.18 | -$0.92 | N/A |
| KEEL | $6.03 | +2.73% | 3.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| KC | $8.58 | -1.61% | 2.5B | -29.59 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| TRVG | $5.31 | +7.06% | 374.6M | 53.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TRUE | $2.54 | +14.93% | 225.9M | -12.10 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AIB | $1.99 | -3.40% | 196.2M | -0.10 | -$20.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HOLO vs VRSK Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while VRSK trades at $182.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check VRSK's competition here
HOLO vs CART Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CART trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CART's competition here
HOLO vs NTSK Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while NTSK trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check NTSK's competition here
HOLO vs KEEL Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while KEEL trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KEEL's competition here
HOLO vs TCGL Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TCGL's competition here
HOLO vs KC Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while KC trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -29.59. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check KC's competition here
HOLO vs TRVG Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 374.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while TRVG trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRVG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TRVG's competition here
HOLO vs TRUE Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while TRUE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TRUE's competition here
HOLO vs AIB Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, AIB has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while AIB trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIB's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to AIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check AIB's competition here
HOLO vs AHG Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while AHG trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check AHG's competition here
HOLO vs ROC Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, ROC has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while ROC trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ROC's P/E ratio is -21.89. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ROC's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ROC's competition here
HOLO vs ZSQR Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while ZSQR trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ZSQR's competition here
HOLO vs RSSS Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, RSSS has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while RSSS trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RSSS's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RSSS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to RSSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check RSSS's competition here
HOLO vs IZEA Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while IZEA trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check IZEA's competition here
HOLO vs GIFT Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while GIFT trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check GIFT's competition here
HOLO vs SST Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while SST trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SST's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check SST's competition here
HOLO vs ZGM Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while ZGM trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ZGM's competition here
HOLO vs ZTG Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while ZTG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ZTG's competition here
HOLO vs AGAE Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while AGAE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check AGAE's competition here
HOLO vs CHAI Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CHAI has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CHAI trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHAI's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHAI's ROE of -3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to CHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CHAI's competition here
HOLO vs TGHL Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, TGHL has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while TGHL trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGHL's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGHL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to TGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check TGHL's competition here
HOLO vs QCLS Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while QCLS trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check QCLS's competition here
HOLO vs RPGL Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while RPGL trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check RPGL's competition here
HOLO vs DST Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DST's competition here
HOLO vs DWRE Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DWRE's competition here
HOLO vs FUEL Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check FUEL's competition here
HOLO vs PRGY Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HOLO has daily volatility of 6.71 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
HOLO vs RMGN Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check RMGN's competition here
HOLO vs XTLY Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check XTLY's competition here
HOLO vs IMPV Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check IMPV's competition here
HOLO vs CRTN Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CRTN's competition here
HOLO vs CALD Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CALD's competition here
HOLO vs ACTA Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check ACTA's competition here
HOLO vs CSC Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check CSC's competition here
HOLO vs DWCH Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check DWCH's competition here
HOLO vs HDP Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HOLO is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HOLO.Check HDP's competition here
HOLO vs CRA Comparison June 2026
HOLO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HOLO stands at 19.9M. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HOLO is priced at $1.51, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HOLO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HOLO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HOLO has daily volatility of 6.71 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here