WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 216.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while IBM trades at $229.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check IBM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 116.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ACN trades at $181.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ACN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while INFY trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check INFY's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check FI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CTSH trades at $59.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CTSH's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while FISV trades at $47.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check FISV's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BR trades at $163.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CDW trades at $146.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CDW's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while FIS trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check FIS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while IREN trades at $46.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -32.42. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check IREN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while WIT trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check WIT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while LDOS trades at $127.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check LDOS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while GIB trades at $69.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check GIB's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CACI trades at $626.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CACI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while IT trades at $185.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check IT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while WSE trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to WSE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check WSE's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while JKHY trades at $154.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check JKHY's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while APLD trades at $28.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -40.17. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check APLD's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CIFR trades at $18.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CIFR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while GDS trades at $32.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check GDS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while INGM trades at $26.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check INGM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while EPAM trades at $114.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check EPAM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while G trades at $34.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas G's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to G. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check G's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SAIC trades at $133.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SAIC's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while EXLS trades at $35.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check EXLS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while PSN trades at $44.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to PSN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check PSN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while NSIT trades at $154.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check NSIT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check NCR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CSQR trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CSQR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check PRFT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while KD trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check KD's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while KEEL trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check KEEL's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SHAZ trades at $57.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SHAZ's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while INOD trades at $57.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 51.48. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check INOD's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while VNET trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check VNET's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while FORTY trades at $116.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check FORTY's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while DXC trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check DXC's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CNXC trades at $27.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CNXC's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while MGRT trades at $121.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 717.53. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check MGRT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while GLOB trades at $35.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check GLOB's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TWKS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BBAI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BBAI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while EFOR trades at $32.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check EFOR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BITF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BITF's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BTCM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CLVT trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CLVT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 933.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while HIVE trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check HIVE's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 928.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while VYX trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check VYX's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ASGN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SLAI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check MGIC's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CTLP's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TASK trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TASK's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 732.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while WYFI trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check WYFI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 725.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while NABL trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check NABL's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while GDYN trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check GDYN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check PHLT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 538.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while IBEX trades at $40.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check IBEX's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 528.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while VRRM trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check VRRM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ALIT trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ALIT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TLS trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TLS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 261.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while HCKT trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check HCKT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check BULLZ's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CNDT trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CNDT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TSSI trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TSSI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SRT's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 175.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while UIS trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check UIS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while LAWR trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -53.57. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check LAWR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CTG's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check KORE's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while DAVA trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check DAVA's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while WYY trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -98.46. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check WYY's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ALYA's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while YB trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to YB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check YB's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ZENA trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ZENA's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CSPI trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -107.86. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CSPI's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while QXL trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is -110.80. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check QXL's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CHRN trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CHRN's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TTEC trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TTEC's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CTM trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -47.66. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CTM's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SAIH trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SAIH's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SIFYR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while EKSO trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check EKSO's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CLPS trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CLPS's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while JFU trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 542.45. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check JFU's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CHOW trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CHOW's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ALAR trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ALAR's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while GLE trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check GLE's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while VEEA trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -55.62. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check VEEA's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check SGLB's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while LZMH trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check LZMH's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while ARBB trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check ARBB's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while TDTH trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check TDTH's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while VEEAW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check VEEAW's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while DTST trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check DTST's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while CYCU trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check CYCU's competition here

WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE: WNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WNS stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAIC has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WNS is priced at $76.48 on the NYSE, while DAIC trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WNS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.36, whereas DAIC's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WNS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAIC's ROE of +37.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WNS is less volatile compared to DAIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WNS.Check DAIC's competition here