Clarivate Plc
Clarivate Plc (CLVT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLVT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVT-PA | $4.02 | +8.67% | 755.5M | -7.93 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| IBM | $233.04 | +2.19% | 219.1B | 20.63 | $11.30 | +2.89% |
| ACN | $177.75 | +0.45% | 109.4B | 14.57 | $12.20 | +3.58% |
| INFY | $12.25 | -0.12% | 49.7B | 15.31 | $0.80 | +4.18% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $61.60 | +0.54% | 32.9B | 9.52 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $55.12 | +0.90% | 26.4B | 12.09 | $4.56 | +2.27% |
| FIS | $46.30 | +1.54% | 24B | 63.45 | $0.73 | +3.55% |
| WIT | $2.03 | -0.98% | 21.2B | 15.58 | $0.13 | +6.04% |
| BR | $158.83 | +1.58% | 18.5B | 17.55 | $9.05 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
CLVT-PA vs IBM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 219.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while IBM trades at $233.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check IBM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs ACN Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 109.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while ACN trades at $177.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check ACN's competition here
CLVT-PA vs INFY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while INFY trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check INFY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs FI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check FI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs FISV Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while FISV trades at $61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check FISV's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CTSH Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CTSH trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CTSH's competition here
CLVT-PA vs FIS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while FIS trades at $46.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check FIS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs WIT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while WIT trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check WIT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs BR Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while BR trades at $158.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check BR's competition here
CLVT-PA vs LDOS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while LDOS trades at $146.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check LDOS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CDW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CDW trades at $132.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CDW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs GIB Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while GIB trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check GIB's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CACI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CACI trades at $508.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CACI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs JKHY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while JKHY trades at $152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check JKHY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs IT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while IT trades at $150.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check IT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs AUR Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while AUR trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check AUR's competition here
CLVT-PA vs APLD Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while APLD trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -84.50. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check APLD's competition here
CLVT-PA vs GDS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while GDS trades at $41.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 65.33. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check GDS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs INGM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while INGM trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check INGM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs DLB Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while DLB trades at $62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check DLB's competition here
CLVT-PA vs EPAM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while EPAM trades at $114.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check EPAM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs G Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while G trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check G's competition here
CLVT-PA vs PSFE-WT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs WAY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while WAY trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check WAY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs EXLS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while EXLS trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check EXLS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SAIC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SAIC trades at $94.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SAIC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs NCR Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check NCR's competition here
CLVT-PA vs PAY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while PAY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 53.81. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check PAY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs WNS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check WNS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs NIQ Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while NIQ trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check NIQ's competition here
CLVT-PA vs KD Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while KD trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check KD's competition here
CLVT-PA vs PRFT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check PRFT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs NYAX Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while NYAX trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 70.89. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check NYAX's competition here
CLVT-PA vs VRRM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while VRRM trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check VRRM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs VNET Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while VNET trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -60.71. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check VNET's competition here
CLVT-PA vs FORTY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while FORTY trades at $132.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 57.60. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check FORTY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs DXC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while DXC trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check DXC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs GLOB Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while GLOB trades at $41.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check GLOB's competition here
CLVT-PA vs KEEL Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while KEEL trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check KEEL's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CLVT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CLVT trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CLVT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs FLYW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while FLYW trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 123.59. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check FLYW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CNXC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CNXC trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CNXC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs BBAI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while BBAI trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check BBAI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TWKS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TWKS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs INOD Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while INOD trades at $41.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 45.52. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check INOD's competition here
CLVT-PA vs BTCM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check BTCM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs AI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while AI trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check AI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs NABL Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 994.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while NABL trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -58.67. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check NABL's competition here
CLVT-PA vs VYX Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 982.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while VYX trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 50.50. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check VYX's competition here
CLVT-PA vs EFOR Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while EFOR trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check EFOR's competition here
CLVT-PA vs ASGN Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while ASGN trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check ASGN's competition here
CLVT-PA vs MGIC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check MGIC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CTLP Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 798.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CTLP trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CTLP's competition here
CLVT-PA vs PHLT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check PHLT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs WYFI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 596.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while WYFI trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check WYFI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TASK Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 569.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TASK trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TASK's competition here
CLVT-PA vs GDYN Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 478M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while GDYN trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check GDYN's competition here
CLVT-PA vs PSFE Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 467.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while PSFE trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check PSFE's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TSSI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TSSI trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TSSI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SHAZ Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 430.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SHAZ trades at $43.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SHAZ's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CD Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CD trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -166.83. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CD's competition here
CLVT-PA vs IBEX Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 379.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while IBEX trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check IBEX's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SDHI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 366.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SDHI trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is -1036.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SDHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SDHI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TLS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TLS trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TLS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs HCKT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 331.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while HCKT trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check HCKT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs BBAI-WT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 311.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs AUROW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 310.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while AUROW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check AUROW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SDHIU Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SDHIU trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SDHIU's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CNDT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CNDT trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CNDT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs BULLZ Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check BULLZ's competition here
CLVT-PA vs XRX Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while XRX trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XRX's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check XRX's competition here
CLVT-PA vs DVLT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while DVLT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check DVLT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs III Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 196.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while III trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas III's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to III's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check III's competition here
CLVT-PA vs UIS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while UIS trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check UIS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SRT Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SRT's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CTG Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CTG's competition here
CLVT-PA vs DMRC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while DMRC trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check DMRC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TTEC Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 144.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TTEC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TTEC's competition here
CLVT-PA vs ALYA Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check ALYA's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CSPI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 104.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CSPI trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -211.00. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CSPI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs XRXDW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while XRXDW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check XRXDW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs KOID Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, KOID has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while KOID trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas KOID's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KOID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to KOID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check KOID's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CTM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CTM trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -22.23. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CTM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs WYY Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while WYY trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -22.05. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check WYY's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SIFYR Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SIFYR's competition here
CLVT-PA vs GMM Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while GMM trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check GMM's competition here
CLVT-PA vs JFU Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while JFU trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check JFU's competition here
CLVT-PA vs USIO Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while USIO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check USIO's competition here
CLVT-PA vs DTST Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while DTST trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -33.25. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check DTST's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CLPS Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CLPS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CLPS's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SAIH Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SAIH trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SAIH's competition here
CLVT-PA vs VEEA Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while VEEA trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check VEEA's competition here
CLVT-PA vs LZMH Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while LZMH trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LZMH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check LZMH's competition here
CLVT-PA vs CHOW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while CHOW trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check CHOW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SLAI Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SLAI trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SLAI's competition here
CLVT-PA vs SGLB Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check SGLB's competition here
CLVT-PA vs LHSW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while LHSW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check LHSW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs VEEAW Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while VEEAW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is more volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check VEEAW's competition here
CLVT-PA vs TDTH Comparison April 2026
CLVT-PA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVT-PA stands at 755.5M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVT-PA is priced at $4.02, while TDTH trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.93, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CLVT-PA's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +5.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVT-PA is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVT-PA.Check TDTH's competition here