Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 243.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while IBM trades at $257.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to IBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check IBM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ACN trades at $258.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ACN's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while INFY trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check INFY's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check FI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CTSH trades at $65.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CTSH's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while FISV trades at $50.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check FISV's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WIT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to WIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WIT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BR trades at $178.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while FIS trades at $38.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check FIS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CDW trades at $153.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CDW's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while LDOS trades at $142.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check LDOS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CACI trades at $675.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CACI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while GIB trades at $80.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check GIB's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while IT trades at $228.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IT's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check IT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while JKHY trades at $161.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check JKHY's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WSE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WSE trades at $10.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WSE's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WSE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to WSE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WSE's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while EPAM trades at $140.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check EPAM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while G trades at $39.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to G's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to G. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check G's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while INGM trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check INGM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SAIC trades at $151.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SAIC's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while EXLS trades at $41.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check EXLS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, PSN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while PSN trades at $50.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PSN's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to PSN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check PSN's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while APLD trades at $17.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check APLD's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while MAAS trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check MAAS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, NSIT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while NSIT trades at $172.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas NSIT's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSIT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to NSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check NSIT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while GDS trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check GDS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check NCR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WNS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CIFR trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CIFR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check PRFT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while DXC trades at $14.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check DXC's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CSQR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CSQR trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CSQR's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CSQR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CSQR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while GLOB trades at $46.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check GLOB's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while FORTY trades at $122.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check FORTY's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CNXC trades at $30.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CNXC's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while MGRT trades at $118.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 705.82. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MGRT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check MGRT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while EFOR trades at $38.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check EFOR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while INOD trades at $43.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to INOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check INOD's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TWKS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BITF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BITF's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BTCM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while KEEL trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check KEEL's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BBAI trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BBAI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while VYX trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check VYX's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CLVT trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CLVT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 976.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while NABL trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check NABL's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 898.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while VNET trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check VNET's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ASGN's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 880.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SLAI trades at $3.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SLAI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check MGIC's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CTLP's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 807.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SHAZ trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SHAZ's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 769.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while GDYN trades at $13.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check GDYN's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 760.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TASK trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to TASK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TASK's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check PHLT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 594M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while IBEX trades at $44.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check IBEX's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while HIVE trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check HIVE's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while VRRM trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check VRRM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 405.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TLS trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TLS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 402.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WYFI trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WYFI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while HCKT trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check HCKT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check BULLZ's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CNDT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CNDT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 235.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ALIT trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ALIT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 193.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TSSI trades at $6.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TSSI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while UIS trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to UIS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check UIS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SRT's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, LAWR has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while LAWR trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas LAWR's P/E ratio is -46.87. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LAWR's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to LAWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check LAWR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CTG's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while KORE trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check KORE's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ALYA's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, DAVA has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while DAVA trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DAVA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DAVA's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to DAVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check DAVA's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, YB has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while YB trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas YB's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to YB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to YB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check YB's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CSPI trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -111.57. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CSPI's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TTEC trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TTEC's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WYY trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -59.15. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WYY's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, WQEY has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while WQEY trades at $8.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas WQEY's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WQEY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to WQEY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check WQEY's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ZENA trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ZENA's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CHRN has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CHRN trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CHRN's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHRN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CHRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CHRN's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, QXL has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while QXL trades at $3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas QXL's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QXL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to QXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check QXL's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SAIH trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SAIH's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CTM trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -37.30. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CTM's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SIFYR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while TDTH trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check TDTH's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, EKSO has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while EKSO trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas EKSO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EKSO's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to EKSO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check EKSO's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while JFU trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check JFU's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CLPS trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CLPS's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CHOW trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CHOW's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, DRK has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while DRK trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DRK's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to DRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check DRK's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while VEEA trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +51.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check VEEA's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check SGLB's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ALAR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ALAR trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ALAR's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ALAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ALAR's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while CYCU trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYCU's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check CYCU's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while DTST trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check DTST's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while ARBB trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check ARBB's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while LZMH trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check LZMH's competition here

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KD stands at 3B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KD is priced at $13.83 on the NYSE, while GLE trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KD currently has a P/E ratio of 14.39, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, KD's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GLE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KD is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KD.Check GLE's competition here